Comparative evaluation of four exome enrichment solutions in 2024: Agilent, Roche, Vazyme and Nanodigmbio.

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY BMC Genomics Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12864-024-11196-z
Vera Belova, Iuliia Vasiliadis, Zhanna Repinskaia, Alina Samitova, Anna Shmitko, Natalya Ponikarovskaya, Oleg Suchalko, Valery Cheranev, Shatalov Peter, Shegai Peter, Kaprin Andrey, Denis Rebrikov, Dmitriy Korostin
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of four exome enrichment solutions in 2024: Agilent, Roche, Vazyme and Nanodigmbio.","authors":"Vera Belova, Iuliia Vasiliadis, Zhanna Repinskaia, Alina Samitova, Anna Shmitko, Natalya Ponikarovskaya, Oleg Suchalko, Valery Cheranev, Shatalov Peter, Shegai Peter, Kaprin Andrey, Denis Rebrikov, Dmitriy Korostin","doi":"10.1186/s12864-024-11196-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole exome sequencing (WES) is essential for identifying genetic variants linked to diseases. This study compares available to date four exome enrichment kits: Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v8, Roche KAPA HyperExome, Vazyme VAHTS Target Capture Core Exome Panel, and Nanodigmbio NEXome Plus Panel v1. We evaluated target design, coverage statistics, and variant calling accuracy across these four different exome capture products. All kits showed high target coverage, with 10x coverage exceeding 97.5% and 20x coverage above 95%. Roche exhibited the most uniform coverage, indicated by the lowest fold-80 scores, while Nanodigmbio had more on-target reads due to fewer off-target reads. Variant calling performance, evaluated using in-lab standard E701 DNA sample, showed high recall rates for all kits, especially Agilent v8. All kits achieved an F-measure above 95.87%. Nanodigmbio had the highest precision with the fewest false positives but a slightly lower F-measure than other kits. This study also highlights the performance of new solutions from Vazyme (China) and Nanodigmbio (China), which were comparable to Agilent v8 and Roche KAPA kits. These findings assist researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate exome capture solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-11196-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is essential for identifying genetic variants linked to diseases. This study compares available to date four exome enrichment kits: Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v8, Roche KAPA HyperExome, Vazyme VAHTS Target Capture Core Exome Panel, and Nanodigmbio NEXome Plus Panel v1. We evaluated target design, coverage statistics, and variant calling accuracy across these four different exome capture products. All kits showed high target coverage, with 10x coverage exceeding 97.5% and 20x coverage above 95%. Roche exhibited the most uniform coverage, indicated by the lowest fold-80 scores, while Nanodigmbio had more on-target reads due to fewer off-target reads. Variant calling performance, evaluated using in-lab standard E701 DNA sample, showed high recall rates for all kits, especially Agilent v8. All kits achieved an F-measure above 95.87%. Nanodigmbio had the highest precision with the fewest false positives but a slightly lower F-measure than other kits. This study also highlights the performance of new solutions from Vazyme (China) and Nanodigmbio (China), which were comparable to Agilent v8 and Roche KAPA kits. These findings assist researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate exome capture solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
期刊最新文献
Predicting microRNA target genes using pan-cancer correlation patterns. Comparative evaluation of four exome enrichment solutions in 2024: Agilent, Roche, Vazyme and Nanodigmbio. Exploring diazotrophic diversity: unveiling Nif core distribution and evolutionary patterns in nitrogen-fixing organisms. Functions of thyroid hormone signaling in regulating melanophore, iridophore, erythrophore, and pigment pattern formation in spotted scat (Scatophagus argus). Significance of KLK7 expression, polymorphisms, and function in sheep horn growth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1