Association between prescribed stimulant medications and overdose among individuals receiving opioid agonist therapy: A retrospective cohort study from British Columbia, Canada

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/add.16760
Samantha Young, Nadia Fairbairn, Zishan Cui, Paxton Bach, Wing Yin Mok, Juls Budau, Amanda Slaunwhite, Lianping Ti, Kanna Hayashi, Seonaid Nolan
{"title":"Association between prescribed stimulant medications and overdose among individuals receiving opioid agonist therapy: A retrospective cohort study from British Columbia, Canada","authors":"Samantha Young,&nbsp;Nadia Fairbairn,&nbsp;Zishan Cui,&nbsp;Paxton Bach,&nbsp;Wing Yin Mok,&nbsp;Juls Budau,&nbsp;Amanda Slaunwhite,&nbsp;Lianping Ti,&nbsp;Kanna Hayashi,&nbsp;Seonaid Nolan","doi":"10.1111/add.16760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We measured the association between prescribed stimulant medications and overdose among individuals receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for opioid use disorder.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study using the British Columbia Provincial Overdose Cohort, a linked administrative database.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>We used data from British Columbia, Canada, from January 2015 through February 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 9395 individuals contributed 18 273 person-years of follow-up while dispensed OAT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>We examined the association between stimulant prescription (primary exposure) and fatal or non-fatal overdose (primary outcome, allowing for recurrent events) after adjusting for potential confounders including sociodemographic characteristics and substance use patterns. As a secondary analysis, we evaluated type of OAT (full agonists involving methadone or slow-release oral morphine versus partial agonist involving buprenorphine/naloxone alone) as a potential effect modifier.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>There were 1746 overdose events; 37 (2.1%) were fatal. Overall, there was no increased risk of overdose among individuals dispensed a stimulant medication while on OAT [adjusted Cox regression hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.86–1.49, <i>P</i> = 0.39]. When analyzed by type of OAT medication, for individuals on buprenorphine, dispensation of a stimulant medication was associated with a reduced risk of overdose (AHR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23–0.96, <i>P</i> = 0.037) while, for individuals on full agonist OAT, dispensation of a stimulant medication was associated with an increased risk of overdose (AHR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.09–2.07, <i>P</i> = 0.012).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There does not appear to be an overall increased risk of overdose for individuals co-prescribed a stimulant medication with opioid agonist therapy (OAT). There appears to be a reduced risk of overdose for individuals dispensed buprenorphine with a stimulant medication compared with those dispensed buprenorphine alone, and an increased risk of overdose for individuals dispensed full agonist OAT (methadone or slow-release oral morphine) with a stimulant medication compared with those dispensed full agonist OAT alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"120 6","pages":"1184-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16760","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

We measured the association between prescribed stimulant medications and overdose among individuals receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for opioid use disorder.

Design

Retrospective cohort study using the British Columbia Provincial Overdose Cohort, a linked administrative database.

Setting

We used data from British Columbia, Canada, from January 2015 through February 2020.

Participants

In total, 9395 individuals contributed 18 273 person-years of follow-up while dispensed OAT.

Measurements

We examined the association between stimulant prescription (primary exposure) and fatal or non-fatal overdose (primary outcome, allowing for recurrent events) after adjusting for potential confounders including sociodemographic characteristics and substance use patterns. As a secondary analysis, we evaluated type of OAT (full agonists involving methadone or slow-release oral morphine versus partial agonist involving buprenorphine/naloxone alone) as a potential effect modifier.

Findings

There were 1746 overdose events; 37 (2.1%) were fatal. Overall, there was no increased risk of overdose among individuals dispensed a stimulant medication while on OAT [adjusted Cox regression hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.86–1.49, P = 0.39]. When analyzed by type of OAT medication, for individuals on buprenorphine, dispensation of a stimulant medication was associated with a reduced risk of overdose (AHR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23–0.96, P = 0.037) while, for individuals on full agonist OAT, dispensation of a stimulant medication was associated with an increased risk of overdose (AHR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.09–2.07, P = 0.012).

Conclusions

There does not appear to be an overall increased risk of overdose for individuals co-prescribed a stimulant medication with opioid agonist therapy (OAT). There appears to be a reduced risk of overdose for individuals dispensed buprenorphine with a stimulant medication compared with those dispensed buprenorphine alone, and an increased risk of overdose for individuals dispensed full agonist OAT (methadone or slow-release oral morphine) with a stimulant medication compared with those dispensed full agonist OAT alone.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受阿片类激动剂治疗的个体中,处方兴奋剂药物与过量服用之间的关系:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:我们测量了在接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的个体中,处方兴奋剂药物与过量服用之间的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究使用不列颠哥伦比亚省用药过量队列,这是一个关联的管理数据库。环境:我们使用的数据来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省,时间为2015年1月至2020年2月。参与者:在分配OAT时,总共有9395个人贡献了18273人年的随访。测量:在调整潜在混杂因素(包括社会人口特征和药物使用模式)后,我们检查了兴奋剂处方(主要暴露)与致命或非致命过量(主要结局,允许复发事件)之间的关系。作为次要分析,我们评估了OAT类型(美沙酮或缓释口服吗啡的完全激动剂与单独丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮的部分激动剂)作为潜在的效果调节剂。结果:过量用药事件1746例;死亡37例(2.1%)。总体而言,服用OAT时,服用兴奋剂药物的患者用药过量的风险没有增加[校正Cox回归风险比(AHR) = 1.13, 95%可信区间(95% CI) = 0.86-1.49, P = 0.39]。当按OAT药物类型进行分析时,对于使用丁丙诺啡的个体,分配兴奋剂药物与过量风险降低相关(AHR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23-0.96, P = 0.037),而对于使用完全激动剂OAT的个体,分配兴奋剂药物与过量风险增加相关(AHR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.09-2.07, P = 0.012)。结论:在阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的同时服用兴奋剂药物的个体,似乎并没有总体上增加服药过量的风险。与单独服用丁丙诺啡相比,服用丁丙诺啡与兴奋剂药物的个体过量服用的风险似乎有所降低,而服用完全激动剂OAT(美沙酮或缓释口服吗啡)与兴奋剂药物的个体过量服用的风险比单独服用完全激动剂OAT的个体增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Contingency management interventions for substance use and addictive behaviours: Review of the United Kingdom evidence base. Social cognition in Korsakoff's syndrome: A meta-analysis. Heated tobacco product use and tobacco abstinence: A prospective cohort study. Examining changes in the prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost-of-living crisis and alcohol duty reforms: A population survey of risky drinkers in Great Britain, 2021-2024. Motivational smoking cessation counselling and community-based follow-up after hospitalisation for vascular disease: A randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1