Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making in Modern Medicine: Case-Based Approach, Current Gaps and Practical Proposal

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.015
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD, FESC , Chiara Fraccaro MD, PhD , Andrea Porzionato MD, PhD , Nicolas Van Mieghem MD, PhD , Hendrik Treede MD, PhD , Nicolas Shammas MD, FACC , Molly Szerlip MD, FACP, FACC, FSCAI , Vinod Thourani MD, FACC , Gino Gerosa MD , Alfredo Marchese MD, PhD , Giuseppe Speziale MD, PhD , Bertrand Ludes MD, PhD , Stephen Pollak MD, PhD , Peter Vanezis MD, PhD , Santo Davide Ferrara MD, PhD
{"title":"Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making in Modern Medicine: Case-Based Approach, Current Gaps and Practical Proposal","authors":"Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD, FESC ,&nbsp;Chiara Fraccaro MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Porzionato MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolas Van Mieghem MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hendrik Treede MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolas Shammas MD, FACC ,&nbsp;Molly Szerlip MD, FACP, FACC, FSCAI ,&nbsp;Vinod Thourani MD, FACC ,&nbsp;Gino Gerosa MD ,&nbsp;Alfredo Marchese MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Speziale MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bertrand Ludes MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stephen Pollak MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Peter Vanezis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Santo Davide Ferrara MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in personalized medicine and Systems Biology have introduced probabilistic models and error discovery to cardiovascular care, aiding disease prevention and procedural planning. However, clinical application faces cultural, technical, and methodological hurdles. Patient autonomy remains essential, with shared decision-making (SDM) gaining importance in managing complex cardiovascular treatment options. Effective SDM relies on collaboration between providers and patients, guided by P5 Medicine principles, which combine psycho-cognitive considerations with predictive, personalized, preventive, and participatory care. Here we propose a 3-step methodological proposal for implementing SDM and enhancing consent acquisition in cardiovascular care. The approach emphasizes personalized patient engagement and the need for clear, comprehensive consent processes. It identifies and addresses significant gaps in current practices, including the complexity of consent language, information dispersion, and the specific needs of vulnerable populations. Issues of Medical Responsibility and/or Liability may raise in the case of absence of consent acquisition or invalid consent due to insufficient/incorrect information. The International Guidelines on Medico-Legal Methods of Ascertainment and Evaluation Criteria are reported. In conclusion, the paper proposes practical solutions, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance decision-making and patient counseling, and strategies to ensure that consent processes are both thorough and legally sound and respectful to the individual's autonomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in personalized medicine and Systems Biology have introduced probabilistic models and error discovery to cardiovascular care, aiding disease prevention and procedural planning. However, clinical application faces cultural, technical, and methodological hurdles. Patient autonomy remains essential, with shared decision-making (SDM) gaining importance in managing complex cardiovascular treatment options. Effective SDM relies on collaboration between providers and patients, guided by P5 Medicine principles, which combine psycho-cognitive considerations with predictive, personalized, preventive, and participatory care. Here we propose a 3-step methodological proposal for implementing SDM and enhancing consent acquisition in cardiovascular care. The approach emphasizes personalized patient engagement and the need for clear, comprehensive consent processes. It identifies and addresses significant gaps in current practices, including the complexity of consent language, information dispersion, and the specific needs of vulnerable populations. Issues of Medical Responsibility and/or Liability may raise in the case of absence of consent acquisition or invalid consent due to insufficient/incorrect information. The International Guidelines on Medico-Legal Methods of Ascertainment and Evaluation Criteria are reported. In conclusion, the paper proposes practical solutions, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance decision-making and patient counseling, and strategies to ensure that consent processes are both thorough and legally sound and respectful to the individual's autonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代医学中的知情同意和共同决策。基于案例的方法,目前的差距和实际建议。
个性化医学和系统生物学的进步将概率模型和错误发现引入心血管护理,帮助疾病预防和程序规划。然而,临床应用面临文化、技术和方法上的障碍。患者自主仍然至关重要,共同决策(SDM)在管理复杂的心血管治疗方案中越来越重要。有效的SDM依赖于提供者和患者之间的合作,以P5医学原则为指导,将心理认知因素与预测性、个性化、预防性和参与性护理相结合。在这里,我们提出了实施SDM和加强心血管护理同意获取的三步方法建议。该方法强调个性化的患者参与和明确,全面的同意过程的需要。它确定并解决了当前实践中的重大差距,包括同意语言的复杂性、信息传播和弱势群体的具体需求。在没有征得同意或由于信息不充分/不正确而导致同意无效的情况下,可能会提出医疗责任和/或责任问题。报告了确定和评估标准的医学-法律方法国际准则。总之,本文提出了切实可行的解决方案,包括使用人工智能(AI)来加强决策和患者咨询,以及确保同意过程既彻底又合法且尊重个人自主权的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Social Determinants of Health and Outcomes in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy Impact of Adherence to the Global Algorithm for Initial Crossing Strategy Selection in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Impact of Cangrelor on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in High Bleeding Risk Patients Kounis Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Cardiovascular Impact of Metabolic Surgery Across Patient and Surgery Subgroups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1