Assessment of verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities in children with stuttering using 5th edition Stanford Binet.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2024.2448009
Rasha Sami Abdul-Aziz, Sherine Ramzy, Ghada Tarek Orabi
{"title":"Assessment of verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities in children with stuttering using 5th edition Stanford Binet.","authors":"Rasha Sami Abdul-Aziz, Sherine Ramzy, Ghada Tarek Orabi","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2448009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stuttering is a speech disorder disrupting fluency with implications that could affect psychological, educational, social, and occupational aspects of life. Cognitive functions include mental processes that allows for execution of goal-directed responses in different situations. They are usually referred to as executive functions (EF) which consists of three main components, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. The Stanford Binet 5th edition (SB5) is an intelligence scale designed to assess various cognitive skills by measuring five main domains that require the administration of these executive skills. Recent research has focused on executive functions skills among children with stuttering (CWS), and how it might affect stuttering development and severity.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the cognitive verbal and nonverbal skills using the Stanford Binet intelligence quotient test 5th edition (SB5) between children with stuttering (CWS) and children with no stuttering (CWNS) and to assess which of these skills affected stuttering severity among CWS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 70 children, 40 CWS and 30 CWNS, were assessed using the SB5 test. Further assessment of the CWS was done using the stuttering severity index (SSI) to determine the degree of stuttering. Statistical analysis and comparison were used to determine results and differences in cognitive skills, and regressive analysis was used to determine the most predicative factor in stuttering development and severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Showed that CWS performed lower scores than CWNS in all SB5 domains except in non-verbal domain, where the two groups did not differ significantly in their performance. Working memory was the weakest skill among CWS and stood out as the only significant predicative factor in stuttering. Children with severe stuttering performed higher in their total IQ, nonverbal IQ, knowledge, and fluid reasoning than moderate stutterers, having the strongest performance in non-verbal IQ, still none of these domains turned out to be of a predicative significance in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that working memory is the weakest executive skill in CWS as well as other executive functions related to cognitive flexibility compared to fluent controls. Working memory skills are significantly lower in CWS but does not correlate with its severity; whereas the strongest skills, among CWS compared to fluent controls, are in the nonverbal domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2448009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stuttering is a speech disorder disrupting fluency with implications that could affect psychological, educational, social, and occupational aspects of life. Cognitive functions include mental processes that allows for execution of goal-directed responses in different situations. They are usually referred to as executive functions (EF) which consists of three main components, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. The Stanford Binet 5th edition (SB5) is an intelligence scale designed to assess various cognitive skills by measuring five main domains that require the administration of these executive skills. Recent research has focused on executive functions skills among children with stuttering (CWS), and how it might affect stuttering development and severity.

Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare the cognitive verbal and nonverbal skills using the Stanford Binet intelligence quotient test 5th edition (SB5) between children with stuttering (CWS) and children with no stuttering (CWNS) and to assess which of these skills affected stuttering severity among CWS.

Methods: A total of 70 children, 40 CWS and 30 CWNS, were assessed using the SB5 test. Further assessment of the CWS was done using the stuttering severity index (SSI) to determine the degree of stuttering. Statistical analysis and comparison were used to determine results and differences in cognitive skills, and regressive analysis was used to determine the most predicative factor in stuttering development and severity.

Results: Showed that CWS performed lower scores than CWNS in all SB5 domains except in non-verbal domain, where the two groups did not differ significantly in their performance. Working memory was the weakest skill among CWS and stood out as the only significant predicative factor in stuttering. Children with severe stuttering performed higher in their total IQ, nonverbal IQ, knowledge, and fluid reasoning than moderate stutterers, having the strongest performance in non-verbal IQ, still none of these domains turned out to be of a predicative significance in severity.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that working memory is the weakest executive skill in CWS as well as other executive functions related to cognitive flexibility compared to fluent controls. Working memory skills are significantly lower in CWS but does not correlate with its severity; whereas the strongest skills, among CWS compared to fluent controls, are in the nonverbal domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
A case of severe TBI: Recovery? Assessment of verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities in children with stuttering using 5th edition Stanford Binet. Virtual reality based audio visual brainwave entrainment to improve learning in children with attention deficit hyperactive disorder. Statement of Retraction: Psychological Resilience, Emotional Symptoms, and Recovery Duration in Adolescent Sport-Related Concussion. The development of a screener for Cerebral Visual Impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1