Beyond Skin Deep: Olfactory Dysfunction as a Common Problem Among Chinese Hereditary Angioedema Patients

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Clinical and Experimental Allergy Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/cea.70001
Hugo W. F. Mak, Valerie Chiang, Jackie S. H. Yim, Elaine Lee, Dorothy L. Y. Lam, Philip H. Li
{"title":"Beyond Skin Deep: Olfactory Dysfunction as a Common Problem Among Chinese Hereditary Angioedema Patients","authors":"Hugo W. F. Mak,&nbsp;Valerie Chiang,&nbsp;Jackie S. H. Yim,&nbsp;Elaine Lee,&nbsp;Dorothy L. Y. Lam,&nbsp;Philip H. Li","doi":"10.1111/cea.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic condition characterised by recurrent, unpredictable episodes of skin, laryngeal and abdominal swelling [<span>1</span>]. In 2011, Perricone et al. reported the issue of olfactory dysfunction (OD), such as hyposmia (reduced sense of smell) and even functional anosmia (loss of sense of smell), in Italian patients with HAE [<span>2</span>]. We believe this is a significant finding, which remains largely neglected and under-investigated by the HAE community and requires validation in non-Western cohorts [<span>2-4</span>]. We therefore conducted this study to address this gap from an Asian perspective.</p><p>We recruited all HAE patients from Queen Mary Hospital, an Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence (ACARE) in Hong Kong [<span>5, 6</span>]. Healthy individuals, matched by age and sex who reported normal olfaction and no history of smelling or OD-related disorders, were recruited as controls. All participants underwent the locally validated ‘Sniffin' Sticks’ test (SST; Burghart Messtechnik, Wedel, Germany) with previously described protocols [<span>7</span>]. They were classified as ‘supersmellers’ (score ≥ 41.5), ‘normosmia’ (30.5 &lt; score &lt; 41.5), ‘hyposmia’ (≤ 30.5) or ‘anosmia’ (≤ 16) [<span>8</span>]. For HAE patients, data on their lowest C4, C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) levels and function, and <i>SERPING1</i> mutations were collected. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster granted approval for this study. All participants provided informed consent. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Chi-squared test and independent <i>t</i>-test were utilised to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to control for age and sex. Among HAE patients, we examined the Spearman correlations among continuous variables. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted between patients with HAE type I and II. A <i>p</i>-value of &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p>Our study included 21 HAE patients (16 [76.2%] type I and 5 [23.8%] type II) and 21 healthy controls, all of Han Chinese ethnicity. Their demographics, SST results and pathogenic mutations are available in the Online Repository (https://osf.io/7fz8u/). As shown in Figure 1, HAE patients had significantly lower SST scores compared to healthy controls (30.8 ± 7.5 vs. 34.7 ± 3.5, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Among HAE patients, 38.1% (8/21) had OD (hyposmia [33.3%, 7/21] or anosmia [4.8%, 1/21]), which was significantly more than the control group (hyposmia [9.5%, 2/21], <i>p</i> = 0.030). After controlling for age and sex, HAE was still significantly associated with OD, with an odds ratio of 9.946 (95% confidence interval = 1.161–85.235, <i>p</i> = 0.036).</p><p>Overall, we found no significant correlations between the C4, C1-INH, and SST scores among HAE patients (see the Online Repository). In our subgroup analysis, C1-INH levels were significantly correlated to SST scores in both type I and II HAE patients, but in opposite directions (type I: <i>ρ</i> = −0.536, <i>p</i> = 0.032; type II: <i>ρ</i> = 0.900, <i>p</i> = 0.037). There were no significant differences in SST scores between type I and II HAE (30.2 ± 8.3 in type I vs. 32.8 ± 4.2 in type II, <i>p</i> = 0.523), nor in the proportion of patients with OD (37.5% [6/16] in type I vs. 40.0% [2/5] in type II, <i>p</i> = 1.000). Patients with gross or structural deletions tended to have lower SST scores than those with missense or nonsense mutations (28.4 ± 11.6 vs. 32.0 ± 4.5), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.459).</p><p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report impaired olfaction in Asian HAE patients. In line with past reports, roughly one-third of HAE patients displayed OD. Even after adjusting for age (a well-recognised factor associated with OD) and sex, HAE patients continued to exhibit a significantly higher, 10-fold risk of OD than healthy individuals. The underlying mechanism of OD in HAE remains elusive. Some postulate that OD is associated with complement depletion, which is similarly observed in multiple other autoimmune conditions despite unclear pathways [<span>2, 9</span>]. Another possible contributing factor is the proximity of the SERPING1 gene and the olfactory receptor genes on chromosome 11q13, where a high frequency of recombination and linkage disequilibrium between the two may lead to abnormalities in gene expression [<span>3</span>]. However, interestingly, in agreement with Forster-Ruhrmann et al., we found that the size or nature of <i>SERPING1</i> mutations did not predict olfactory outcomes, suggesting that the underlying pathophysiology of OD in HAE may be complex and multifactorial [<span>3</span>].</p><p>This study's limitations include its small sample size, which only included type I and II HAE patients. It would be interesting to investigate its effect on quality of life and if this phenomenon exists in HAE with normal C1-INH. Besides, no specific investigations such as nasoendoscopy were employed to definitively exclude comorbid nasal pathologies.</p><p>In conclusion, our study indicates that approximately 1 in 3 Chinese patients with HAE suffers from OD, which underscores the need for further large-scale and mechanistic studies.</p><p>H.W.F.M. researched the data and drafted the manuscript. V.C., J.S.H.Y., E.L. and D.L.Y.L. researched the data. P.H.L. conceptualised and supervised the study. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"55 8","pages":"728-730"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic condition characterised by recurrent, unpredictable episodes of skin, laryngeal and abdominal swelling [1]. In 2011, Perricone et al. reported the issue of olfactory dysfunction (OD), such as hyposmia (reduced sense of smell) and even functional anosmia (loss of sense of smell), in Italian patients with HAE [2]. We believe this is a significant finding, which remains largely neglected and under-investigated by the HAE community and requires validation in non-Western cohorts [2-4]. We therefore conducted this study to address this gap from an Asian perspective.

We recruited all HAE patients from Queen Mary Hospital, an Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence (ACARE) in Hong Kong [5, 6]. Healthy individuals, matched by age and sex who reported normal olfaction and no history of smelling or OD-related disorders, were recruited as controls. All participants underwent the locally validated ‘Sniffin' Sticks’ test (SST; Burghart Messtechnik, Wedel, Germany) with previously described protocols [7]. They were classified as ‘supersmellers’ (score ≥ 41.5), ‘normosmia’ (30.5 < score < 41.5), ‘hyposmia’ (≤ 30.5) or ‘anosmia’ (≤ 16) [8]. For HAE patients, data on their lowest C4, C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) levels and function, and SERPING1 mutations were collected. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster granted approval for this study. All participants provided informed consent. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Chi-squared test and independent t-test were utilised to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to control for age and sex. Among HAE patients, we examined the Spearman correlations among continuous variables. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted between patients with HAE type I and II. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Our study included 21 HAE patients (16 [76.2%] type I and 5 [23.8%] type II) and 21 healthy controls, all of Han Chinese ethnicity. Their demographics, SST results and pathogenic mutations are available in the Online Repository (https://osf.io/7fz8u/). As shown in Figure 1, HAE patients had significantly lower SST scores compared to healthy controls (30.8 ± 7.5 vs. 34.7 ± 3.5, p = 0.040). Among HAE patients, 38.1% (8/21) had OD (hyposmia [33.3%, 7/21] or anosmia [4.8%, 1/21]), which was significantly more than the control group (hyposmia [9.5%, 2/21], p = 0.030). After controlling for age and sex, HAE was still significantly associated with OD, with an odds ratio of 9.946 (95% confidence interval = 1.161–85.235, p = 0.036).

Overall, we found no significant correlations between the C4, C1-INH, and SST scores among HAE patients (see the Online Repository). In our subgroup analysis, C1-INH levels were significantly correlated to SST scores in both type I and II HAE patients, but in opposite directions (type I: ρ = −0.536, p = 0.032; type II: ρ = 0.900, p = 0.037). There were no significant differences in SST scores between type I and II HAE (30.2 ± 8.3 in type I vs. 32.8 ± 4.2 in type II, p = 0.523), nor in the proportion of patients with OD (37.5% [6/16] in type I vs. 40.0% [2/5] in type II, p = 1.000). Patients with gross or structural deletions tended to have lower SST scores than those with missense or nonsense mutations (28.4 ± 11.6 vs. 32.0 ± 4.5), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.459).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report impaired olfaction in Asian HAE patients. In line with past reports, roughly one-third of HAE patients displayed OD. Even after adjusting for age (a well-recognised factor associated with OD) and sex, HAE patients continued to exhibit a significantly higher, 10-fold risk of OD than healthy individuals. The underlying mechanism of OD in HAE remains elusive. Some postulate that OD is associated with complement depletion, which is similarly observed in multiple other autoimmune conditions despite unclear pathways [2, 9]. Another possible contributing factor is the proximity of the SERPING1 gene and the olfactory receptor genes on chromosome 11q13, where a high frequency of recombination and linkage disequilibrium between the two may lead to abnormalities in gene expression [3]. However, interestingly, in agreement with Forster-Ruhrmann et al., we found that the size or nature of SERPING1 mutations did not predict olfactory outcomes, suggesting that the underlying pathophysiology of OD in HAE may be complex and multifactorial [3].

This study's limitations include its small sample size, which only included type I and II HAE patients. It would be interesting to investigate its effect on quality of life and if this phenomenon exists in HAE with normal C1-INH. Besides, no specific investigations such as nasoendoscopy were employed to definitively exclude comorbid nasal pathologies.

In conclusion, our study indicates that approximately 1 in 3 Chinese patients with HAE suffers from OD, which underscores the need for further large-scale and mechanistic studies.

H.W.F.M. researched the data and drafted the manuscript. V.C., J.S.H.Y., E.L. and D.L.Y.L. researched the data. P.H.L. conceptualised and supervised the study. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越皮肤深层:嗅觉功能障碍是中国遗传性血管性水肿患者的常见问题。
遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,其特征是反复发作,不可预测的皮肤、喉部和腹部肿胀。2011年,Perricone等人报道了意大利HAE患者的嗅觉功能障碍(OD)问题,如嗅觉减退(嗅觉减退)甚至功能性嗅觉缺失(嗅觉丧失)。我们认为这是一个重要的发现,但在很大程度上仍被HAE社区忽视和研究不足,需要在非西方人群中进行验证[2-4]。因此,我们进行了这项研究,从亚洲的角度来解决这一差距。我们从玛丽医院招募了所有HAE患者,该医院是香港的一个血管水肿参考和卓越中心(ACARE)[5,6]。健康个体,年龄和性别匹配,报告嗅觉正常,没有嗅觉史或吸毒过量相关疾病,被招募作为对照组。所有参与者都接受了当地验证的“嗅探棒”测试(SST;Burghart Messtechnik, Wedel, Germany)使用先前描述的协议[7]。他们被归类为“超级嗅觉者”(评分≥41.5)、“正常嗅觉者”(评分30.5)、“嗅觉不足者”(评分≤30.5)或“嗅觉缺失者”(评分≤16)[8]。对于HAE患者,收集其最低C4, c1 -抑制剂(C1-INH)水平和功能以及SERPING1突变的数据。香港大学/医院管理局香港西区联网的院校检讨委员会已批准这项研究。所有参与者均提供知情同意。采用IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY)进行统计分析。分类变量和连续变量的比较分别采用卡方检验和独立t检验。采用Logistic回归控制年龄和性别。在HAE患者中,我们检查了连续变量之间的Spearman相关性。此外,在I型和II型HAE患者之间进行了亚组分析。p值为&lt; 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。我们的研究纳入了21例HAE患者(16例[76.2%]I型和5例[23.8%]II型)和21例健康对照,均为汉族。他们的人口统计、SST结果和致病突变可在在线存储库(https://osf.io/7fz8u/)中获得。如图1所示,HAE患者的SST评分明显低于健康对照组(30.8±7.5比34.7±3.5,p = 0.040)。在HAE患者中,38.1%(8/21)存在OD(低氧血症[33.3%,7/21]或嗅觉缺失[4.8%,1/21]),显著高于对照组(低氧血症[9.5%,2/21],p = 0.030)。在控制年龄和性别后,HAE与OD的比值比仍为9.946(95%可信区间= 1.161 ~ 85.235,p = 0.036)。总的来说,我们发现在HAE患者中C4、C1-INH和SST评分之间没有显著的相关性(见在线知识库)。在我们的亚组分析中,C1-INH水平与I型和II型HAE患者的SST评分显著相关,但方向相反(I型:ρ =−0.536,p = 0.032;II型:ρ = 0.900, p = 0.037)。I型和II型HAE患者的SST评分无显著差异(I型为30.2±8.3分,II型为32.8±4.2分,p = 0.523), OD患者比例也无显著差异(I型为37.5% [6/16],II型为40.0% [2/5],p = 1.000)。大体或结构缺失患者的SST评分往往低于错义或无义突变患者(28.4±11.6∶32.0±4.5),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.459)。据我们所知,这是第一个报道亚洲HAE患者嗅觉受损的研究。与过去的报道一致,大约三分之一的HAE患者表现为用药过量。即使在调整了年龄(一个公认的与用药过量相关的因素)和性别后,HAE患者的用药过量风险仍然明显高于健康个体,为10倍。HAE的潜在机制尚不清楚。一些人假设OD与补体耗竭有关,这在多种其他自身免疫性疾病中也有类似的观察,尽管途径不明确[2,9]。另一个可能的影响因素是染色体11q13上SERPING1基因和嗅觉受体基因的接近性,其中两者之间的高频率重组和连锁不平衡可能导致基因表达[3]异常。然而,有趣的是,与福斯特-鲁曼等人一致,我们发现SERPING1突变的大小或性质并不能预测嗅觉结果,这表明HAE中OD的潜在病理生理可能是复杂和多因素的。该研究的局限性包括样本量小,仅包括I型和II型HAE患者。研究其对生活质量的影响以及这种现象是否存在于C1-INH正常的HAE患者中是很有趣的。 此外,没有使用鼻内窥镜等特殊检查来明确排除共病的鼻腔病变。总之,我们的研究表明,大约三分之一的中国HAE患者患有OD,这强调了进一步大规模和机制研究的必要性。研究数据并起草手稿。vc、J.S.H.Y、E.L.和D.L.Y.L.研究了这些数据。P.H.L.构思并监督了这项研究。所有作者在提交前都参与并批准了稿件的最终版本。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Mouse Allergen-Specific IgE and IgG4 in Contemporary Animal Research Environments. The Clinical Value of Measuring Nasal Nitric Oxide in Addition to Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Asthma Associated With Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Managing Renewed Food Avoidance Following an Allergic Reaction for Patients With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. 'What' and 'How' to Measure in Allergy and Clinical Immunology: A Systematic Review of Core Outcome Sets and Outcome Harmonisation Processes. Fulminant Anaphylaxis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1