Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.

Abstract

Objectives: Functional Disorders (FD) are highly prevalent conditions that are diagnosed based on the presence of specific patterns of somatic symptoms. Examples of FDs include Fibromyalgia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Many patients who meet the criteria do not receive a formal diagnostic label. This systematic review aims to assess factors associated with receiving an FD diagnostic label.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. All research methodologies and languages were included with a focus on experiences and impacts of receiving/having an FD diagnostic label. Excluded studies were those not mentioning diagnostic labels, only involving single pain symptoms, and studies solely focusing on functional neurological symptoms. Screening, data extraction and quality ratings (using the QuADS instrument) were performed by two independent reviewers.

Results: 15 Studies were identified (10 quantitative and 5 qualitative). Our results show that female patients were more likely to receive an FD diagnostic label for their symptoms; other associations were less consistent and only found for specific labels or research designs. In general, quality of life and healthcare use did not seem to differ between patients with and without an FD diagnostic label. From the healthcare professional's perspective there was doubt about giving an FD diagnostic label, mainly due to concerns of harm for patients. Quality of included studies was rated low to moderate.

Conclusion: Better understanding of factors associated with receiving or having an FD diagnostic label, independently from symptom development can help healthcare professionals make evidence-based decisions in labelling or not; however, high quality studies on this topic are urgently needed.