Comparison of Maylard and Cherney incisions' outcomes in hysterectomy surgery for benign indications: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL European Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1186/s40001-025-02311-1
Maryam Vaezi, Roghayeh Zarei, Hosein Azizi
{"title":"Comparison of Maylard and Cherney incisions' outcomes in hysterectomy surgery for benign indications: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Maryam Vaezi, Roghayeh Zarei, Hosein Azizi","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02311-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Choosing the incision for surgery depends on a variety of factors, including the surgeon's preference, patient preference, surgical indications, the patient's systemic issues, previous surgical scars, and other considerations. This trial aimed to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes of two techniques-Maylard and Cherney incisions-in benign hysterectomy procedures for women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Al-Zahra Women's Tertiary Referral University Hospital. A total of 60 patients undergoing benign hysterectomy were randomly allocated to two groups, with one group undergoing surgery with a Maylard incision and the other with a Cherney incision. Surgeries in both groups were performed by a gynecologist oncologist who was a member of the university faculty, accompanied by an Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in hemoglobin levels or clinical or obstetric characteristics before surgery between the two study groups (p > 0.05). The mean time from skin incision to entering the abdominal cavity was 14.23 min for Maylard and 13.6 min for Cherney (p = 0.091). The average blood loss was 506.6 mL in the Maylard group and 429.3 mL in the Cherney group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.031). Postoperative hemoglobin levels were 11.68 g/dL in the Maylard group and 12.07 g/dL in the Cherney group (p = 0.133). Pain scores were higher in the Cherney group than in the Maylard group (p = 0.041). There were no surgical complications after 1 and 3 months in the study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No complications were observed in any of the patients following the surgery. The Mylard incision showed a higher level of bleeding in comparison with the Cherney incision, which was linked to more noticeable pain. Nevertheless, both incisions are deemed as effective options for gynecological surgeries, offering superb visibility to the pelvis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02311-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Choosing the incision for surgery depends on a variety of factors, including the surgeon's preference, patient preference, surgical indications, the patient's systemic issues, previous surgical scars, and other considerations. This trial aimed to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes of two techniques-Maylard and Cherney incisions-in benign hysterectomy procedures for women.

Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Al-Zahra Women's Tertiary Referral University Hospital. A total of 60 patients undergoing benign hysterectomy were randomly allocated to two groups, with one group undergoing surgery with a Maylard incision and the other with a Cherney incision. Surgeries in both groups were performed by a gynecologist oncologist who was a member of the university faculty, accompanied by an Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident.

Results: There were no significant differences in hemoglobin levels or clinical or obstetric characteristics before surgery between the two study groups (p > 0.05). The mean time from skin incision to entering the abdominal cavity was 14.23 min for Maylard and 13.6 min for Cherney (p = 0.091). The average blood loss was 506.6 mL in the Maylard group and 429.3 mL in the Cherney group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.031). Postoperative hemoglobin levels were 11.68 g/dL in the Maylard group and 12.07 g/dL in the Cherney group (p = 0.133). Pain scores were higher in the Cherney group than in the Maylard group (p = 0.041). There were no surgical complications after 1 and 3 months in the study groups.

Conclusions: No complications were observed in any of the patients following the surgery. The Mylard incision showed a higher level of bleeding in comparison with the Cherney incision, which was linked to more noticeable pain. Nevertheless, both incisions are deemed as effective options for gynecological surgeries, offering superb visibility to the pelvis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
良性子宫切除术中Maylard切口与Cherney切口预后的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
目的:选择手术切口取决于多种因素,包括外科医生的偏好、患者的偏好、手术指征、患者的全身问题、既往手术疤痕等因素。本试验旨在评价和比较两种技术——maylard切口和Cherney切口在女性良性子宫切除术中的手术效果。材料和方法:在Al-Zahra妇女三级转诊大学医院进行了一项随机对照试验。将60例良性子宫切除术患者随机分为两组,一组采用Maylard切口,另一组采用Cherney切口。两组的手术均由一名大学教员的妇科肿瘤学家进行,并由一名妇产科住院医师陪同。结果:两组患者术前血红蛋白水平、临床及产科特征差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。Maylard从皮肤切口到进入腹腔的平均时间为14.23 min, Cherney为13.6 min (p = 0.091)。Maylard组平均失血量为506.6 mL, Cherney组平均失血量为429.3 mL,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.031)。Maylard组术后血红蛋白水平为11.68 g/dL, Cherney组为12.07 g/dL (p = 0.133)。Cherney组疼痛评分高于Maylard组(p = 0.041)。研究组在1个月和3个月后均无手术并发症。结论:所有患者术后均无并发症发生。与Cherney切口相比,Mylard切口的出血程度更高,后者与更明显的疼痛有关。然而,这两种切口被认为是妇科手术的有效选择,提供了极好的骨盆可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Clinical value of sputum galactomannan testing in the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Delayed bedtime on workdays is associated with an increased prevalence of gallstones: a population-based study. Prognostic and predictive value of a novel immuno-proliferative biomarker signature for targeted therapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer. Development of a novel rabbit auricle xenograft model of human PC3 prostate cancer. Integrative analysis reveals luteolin's molecular targets and mechanisms in pancreatic cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1