Post-marketing safety of pimavanserin: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2460444
Dong Liu, Xueni Zhang, Haiyan Xu
{"title":"Post-marketing safety of pimavanserin: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).","authors":"Dong Liu, Xueni Zhang, Haiyan Xu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pimavanserin is a new non-dopamine neurotransmitter antipsychotic drug. This study aimed to conduct a post-marketing pharmacovigilance study of pimavanserin, through data mining technology using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed adverse event reports for patients using pimavanserin. Data were classified using systematic organ classification (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of the Medical Dictionary for Regular Activities (MedDRA). Four signal algorithms [reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS), and bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN)] were used to detect positive signals, and the median time-to-onset was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adverse drug events (ADEs) related to pimavanserin (<i>n</i> = 31,852) were analyzed, exhibiting an annual linear upward trend (<i>p</i> = 0.027). The ADEs involved 27 SOCs, but only 'Psychiatric disorders' simultaneously satisfied four algorithms. Overall, 153 PTs simultaneously satisfied four algorithms. Subgroup analysis of differences in the top 30 signal intensity PTs according to sex yielded significant results for seven PTs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The median time-to-onset was 97 days, the highest proportion occurred within the first 30 days (31.79%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some new PT signals not listed in the label were identified, and some PT signals showed differences according to sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2460444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pimavanserin is a new non-dopamine neurotransmitter antipsychotic drug. This study aimed to conduct a post-marketing pharmacovigilance study of pimavanserin, through data mining technology using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Research design and methods: We analyzed adverse event reports for patients using pimavanserin. Data were classified using systematic organ classification (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of the Medical Dictionary for Regular Activities (MedDRA). Four signal algorithms [reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS), and bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN)] were used to detect positive signals, and the median time-to-onset was determined.

Results: Adverse drug events (ADEs) related to pimavanserin (n = 31,852) were analyzed, exhibiting an annual linear upward trend (p = 0.027). The ADEs involved 27 SOCs, but only 'Psychiatric disorders' simultaneously satisfied four algorithms. Overall, 153 PTs simultaneously satisfied four algorithms. Subgroup analysis of differences in the top 30 signal intensity PTs according to sex yielded significant results for seven PTs (p < 0.05). The median time-to-onset was 97 days, the highest proportion occurred within the first 30 days (31.79%).

Conclusions: Some new PT signals not listed in the label were identified, and some PT signals showed differences according to sex.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹马色林上市后安全性:基于FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实世界药物警戒研究
背景:匹马万色林是一种新型的非多巴胺神经递质抗精神病药物。本研究旨在通过使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的数据挖掘技术,对匹马万色林进行上市后药物警戒研究。研究设计和方法:我们分析了使用匹马西林患者的不良事件报告。数据采用常规活动医学词典(MedDRA)的系统器官分类(SOC)和首选术语(PT)进行分类。采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)和贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)四种信号算法检测阳性信号,并确定中位发病时间。结果:匹马万色林相关不良事件(ade) (n = 31852)呈逐年线性上升趋势(p = 0.027)。ADEs涉及27个soc,但只有“精神障碍”同时满足4个算法。总体而言,153个PTs同时满足四种算法。根据性别对前30名信号强度的PTs进行亚组分析,发现有7个PTs有显著性差异(p)。结论:一些未在标签中列出的新PT信号被识别出来,一些PT信号存在性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of antithrombotic drug options in acute ischemic stroke. Safety concerns associated with various types of statins: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. A novel, widespread impurity in mass-compounded tirzepatide/b12 products: patient safety implications. Refractory immune-related adverse events (irAes) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a multiorgan management review. Long-term safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in Japan: a 12-month post-marketing surveillance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1