The use of outpatient support services: Differences between people with mild cognitive impairment and people with mild to moderate dementia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1177/13872877251314060
Anne Keefer, Nikolas Dietzel, Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas, Elmar Graessel
{"title":"The use of outpatient support services: Differences between people with mild cognitive impairment and people with mild to moderate dementia.","authors":"Anne Keefer, Nikolas Dietzel, Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas, Elmar Graessel","doi":"10.1177/13872877251314060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the utilization of outpatient support services by people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the use of support services by people with MCI compared to people with mild to moderate dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data basis is the multicenter, prospective register study 'Digital Dementia Register Bavaria - digiDEM Bayern'. The sample consists of 913 people with cognitive impairment, including 389 with MCI and 524 with mild to moderate dementia. Classification into 'MCI' and 'mild to moderate dementia' is based on the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The use of support services was surveyed using the Dementia Assessment of Service Needs. Fisher's exact test and multiple linear regression were conducted to analyze for group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four out of thirteen support services are used less frequently by people with MCI than by people with mild to moderate dementia: 'Outpatient care' (<i>p</i> < 0.001, φ = -0.199), 'Acquisition of aids' (<i>p</i> = 0.004, φ = -0.096), 'Adult daycare' (<i>p</i> < 0.001, φ = -0.290), and 'Respite care' (<i>p</i> = 0.029, φ = -0.095). Even the overall utilization rate is lower for people with MCI (b = -0.18, <i>p</i> = 0.027), although other factors such as a care level (b = 1.01, <i>p</i> < 0.001) are more strongly related.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are differences in utilization between people with MCI and people with mild to moderate dementia, but these are small. Therefore, access to support services should be provided at the first signs of cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251314060"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251314060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the utilization of outpatient support services by people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the use of support services by people with MCI compared to people with mild to moderate dementia.

Methods: The data basis is the multicenter, prospective register study 'Digital Dementia Register Bavaria - digiDEM Bayern'. The sample consists of 913 people with cognitive impairment, including 389 with MCI and 524 with mild to moderate dementia. Classification into 'MCI' and 'mild to moderate dementia' is based on the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The use of support services was surveyed using the Dementia Assessment of Service Needs. Fisher's exact test and multiple linear regression were conducted to analyze for group differences.

Results: Four out of thirteen support services are used less frequently by people with MCI than by people with mild to moderate dementia: 'Outpatient care' (p < 0.001, φ = -0.199), 'Acquisition of aids' (p = 0.004, φ = -0.096), 'Adult daycare' (p < 0.001, φ = -0.290), and 'Respite care' (p = 0.029, φ = -0.095). Even the overall utilization rate is lower for people with MCI (b = -0.18, p = 0.027), although other factors such as a care level (b = 1.01, p < 0.001) are more strongly related.

Conclusions: There are differences in utilization between people with MCI and people with mild to moderate dementia, but these are small. Therefore, access to support services should be provided at the first signs of cognitive impairment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Di Huang Yi Zhi Fang improves cognitive function in APP/PS1 mice by inducing neuronal mitochondrial autophagy through the PINK1-parkin pathway. The use of outpatient support services: Differences between people with mild cognitive impairment and people with mild to moderate dementia. Dancing towards speech improvement: Repurposing dance for motor speech deficits in neurodegenerative diseases. Cognivue Clarity® characterizes amyloid status and preclinical Alzheimer's disease in biomarker confirmed cohorts in the Bio-Hermes Study. Diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease using a fully automated platform: A real-world clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1