The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791646
Kudure Basavaraj Prashanth, Haraganahalli Anandappa Manjunatha, Prathvi P Nayak
{"title":"The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforation.","authors":"Kudure Basavaraj Prashanth, Haraganahalli Anandappa Manjunatha, Prathvi P Nayak","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains high platelet concentration and growth factors that help in rapid wound healing, hemostasis, and decreased scarring. It has been used in various conditions to aid in healing, but its use in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) is not yet common. <b>Objective</b>  To compare the outcome of using PRP with myringoplasty with that of myringoplasty alone in the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. <b>Methods</b>  Sixty-eight patients in the 16-to-50 years age group with tympanic membrane perforation of 3 months duration, with dry ear for 6 weeks, and mild to-moderate conductive hearing loss were selected and divided by simple randomization into 2 equal groups. A thorough preoperative evaluation was done. In group A, patients underwent myringoplasty, and in group B, patients underwent myringoplasty with PRP. Patients were followed up for 3 months postsurgery. <b>Results</b>  At 6 weeks, 67.6 and 94.1% had graft uptake in groups A and B, respectively ( <i>p</i> -value 0.011). At 3 months, 85.3 and 97.1% had graft uptake in groups A and B, respectively ( <i>p</i> -value 0.197). The mean pure tone audiometry difference in group A was 8.35 ± 2.05, and 11.00 ± 2.28 in group B ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). The mean air-bone gap difference for group A was 8.29 ± 2.14, and 10.76 ± 2.36 for group B ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Graft uptake rate at 6 weeks, pure tone audiometry, and air-bone gap difference were statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b> The present study results showed that the use of PRP during myringoplasty aids healing of the tympanic membrane with better hearing improvement in the postoperative period when compared to myringoplasty alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains high platelet concentration and growth factors that help in rapid wound healing, hemostasis, and decreased scarring. It has been used in various conditions to aid in healing, but its use in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) is not yet common. Objective  To compare the outcome of using PRP with myringoplasty with that of myringoplasty alone in the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. Methods  Sixty-eight patients in the 16-to-50 years age group with tympanic membrane perforation of 3 months duration, with dry ear for 6 weeks, and mild to-moderate conductive hearing loss were selected and divided by simple randomization into 2 equal groups. A thorough preoperative evaluation was done. In group A, patients underwent myringoplasty, and in group B, patients underwent myringoplasty with PRP. Patients were followed up for 3 months postsurgery. Results  At 6 weeks, 67.6 and 94.1% had graft uptake in groups A and B, respectively ( p -value 0.011). At 3 months, 85.3 and 97.1% had graft uptake in groups A and B, respectively ( p -value 0.197). The mean pure tone audiometry difference in group A was 8.35 ± 2.05, and 11.00 ± 2.28 in group B ( p  < 0.001). The mean air-bone gap difference for group A was 8.29 ± 2.14, and 10.76 ± 2.36 for group B ( p  < 0.001). Graft uptake rate at 6 weeks, pure tone audiometry, and air-bone gap difference were statistically significant. Conclusion The present study results showed that the use of PRP during myringoplasty aids healing of the tympanic membrane with better hearing improvement in the postoperative period when compared to myringoplasty alone.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富血小板血浆在鼓膜穿孔修复中的作用。
富血小板血浆(PRP)含有高血小板浓度和生长因子,有助于伤口快速愈合、止血和减少疤痕。它已经在各种情况下用于帮助愈合,但它在耳鼻喉科(ENT)的应用还不常见。目的比较PRP联合鼓膜成形术与单独鼓膜成形术修复鼓膜穿孔的效果。方法选择16 ~ 50岁年龄组中耳膜穿孔3个月、耳干6周、轻中度传导性听力损失患者68例,采用简单随机法分为2组。术前进行了全面的评估。A组患者行鼓膜成形术,B组患者行PRP鼓膜成形术。术后随访3个月。结果6周时,A、B组小鼠移植物摄取率分别为67.6、94.1% (p值分别为0.011)。3个月时,A组和B组分别有85.3和97.1%的患者有移植物摄取(p值为0.197)。A组的平均纯音听力差为8.35±2.05,B组的平均纯音听力差为11.00±2.28 (p) p结论在鼓膜成形术中应用PRP有助于鼓膜愈合,术后听力改善较单纯鼓膜成形术好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Headache Profile of Patients Attending Otorhinolaryngology Clinics: Navigating Diagnostic Challenges. Knowledge and Practices of Hearing Screening and Hearing Loss Management among Ear, Nose, and Throat Physicians in Saudi Arabia. Hearing and Balance in Adult Patients with a History of Traumatic Brain Injury. The Role of Curcuminoid in Preventing and Repairing Damage to the Organ of Corti in Rattus norvegicus Diabetes Mellitus Model as Assessed by DPOAE Examination with Plasma Levels of HIF-1α and VEGF-A. Effectiveness of Stapedotomy in Improving Audibility and Quality of Life in Patients with Unilateral Otosclerosis - A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1