Effects of early palliative care intervention on medical resource use among end-of-life patients.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal for Quality in Health Care Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzae119
Chia-Chia Lin, Tsing-Fen Ho, Chang-Hung Lin, Nu-Man Tsai, Yu-Hung Kuo, Ju-Huei Chien
{"title":"Effects of early palliative care intervention on medical resource use among end-of-life patients.","authors":"Chia-Chia Lin, Tsing-Fen Ho, Chang-Hung Lin, Nu-Man Tsai, Yu-Hung Kuo, Ju-Huei Chien","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Taiwan, as the population ages, palliative care services (PCS) have expanded significantly to include comprehensive benefit plans for critically ill individuals, supported by reimbursements from the National Health Insurance program. However, incorporating palliative care into the medical management of these patients presents several challenges. We aim to evaluate the effects of palliative care interventions on medical resources in end-of-life scenarios, to promote earlier palliative care access and provide high-quality healthcare services for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2202 patients were included in this study. Primary diagnosis and referral for PCS were assessed using ICD-10 and HNI code. All study subjects were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive PCS (no-PCS), patients who received PCS before their final hospital admission (PCS-before), and patients who received PCS after their final admission (PCS-after). We evaluated (i) the effects of PCS on eight medical resource utilization outcomes within the 30 days preceding death and (ii) the effects of early intervention on two major diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initiating PCS before a patient's last hospital admission was associated with less aggressive medical interventions in the 30 days before death, including reduced length of intensive care unit (ICU) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.25], and rates of endotracheal intubation (OR = 0.12), respiratory ventilator support (OR = 0.20), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR = 0.18), and blood transfusion (OR = 0.65). Among patients with cancer and lung diseases, those who received PCS prior to their final hospitalization of over 14 days experienced reduced hospitalization duration (OR = 0.52 and 0.24, respectively). Patients with lung disease also had significantly lower odds of ICU stays (OR = 0.44) and respiratory ventilation (OR = 0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The timing of palliative care intervention critically impacts on duration of hospitalization and ICU stay and the need for intubation procedures or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The findings can help the government and medical providers in developing comprehensive palliative care policies and programs to improve care quality and patient rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Taiwan, as the population ages, palliative care services (PCS) have expanded significantly to include comprehensive benefit plans for critically ill individuals, supported by reimbursements from the National Health Insurance program. However, incorporating palliative care into the medical management of these patients presents several challenges. We aim to evaluate the effects of palliative care interventions on medical resources in end-of-life scenarios, to promote earlier palliative care access and provide high-quality healthcare services for patients.

Methods: A total of 2202 patients were included in this study. Primary diagnosis and referral for PCS were assessed using ICD-10 and HNI code. All study subjects were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive PCS (no-PCS), patients who received PCS before their final hospital admission (PCS-before), and patients who received PCS after their final admission (PCS-after). We evaluated (i) the effects of PCS on eight medical resource utilization outcomes within the 30 days preceding death and (ii) the effects of early intervention on two major diseases.

Results: Initiating PCS before a patient's last hospital admission was associated with less aggressive medical interventions in the 30 days before death, including reduced length of intensive care unit (ICU) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.25], and rates of endotracheal intubation (OR = 0.12), respiratory ventilator support (OR = 0.20), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR = 0.18), and blood transfusion (OR = 0.65). Among patients with cancer and lung diseases, those who received PCS prior to their final hospitalization of over 14 days experienced reduced hospitalization duration (OR = 0.52 and 0.24, respectively). Patients with lung disease also had significantly lower odds of ICU stays (OR = 0.44) and respiratory ventilation (OR = 0.33).

Conclusion: The timing of palliative care intervention critically impacts on duration of hospitalization and ICU stay and the need for intubation procedures or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The findings can help the government and medical providers in developing comprehensive palliative care policies and programs to improve care quality and patient rights.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:在台湾,随着人口老龄化的加剧,姑息关怀服务(PCS)已大幅扩展到包括危重病人的综合福利计划,并得到国民健康保险计划的报销支持。然而,将姑息关怀纳入这些病人的医疗管理中面临着一些挑战。我们的目的是评估姑息关怀干预对生命末期医疗资源的影响,以促进姑息关怀的早期使用,并为患者提供高质量的医疗服务:本研究共纳入 2202 名患者。方法:本研究共纳入 2202 名患者,使用 ICD-10 和 HNI 编码评估 PCS 的主要诊断和转诊情况。所有研究对象分为三组:未接受 PCS 的患者(无 PCS)、在最终入院前接受 PCS 的患者(PCS-before)和在最终入院后接受 PCS 的患者(PCS-after)。我们评估了 (i) PCS 对死亡前 30 天内八种医疗资源利用结果的影响,以及 (ii) 早期干预对两种主要疾病的影响:结果:在患者最后一次入院前启动 PCS 与死亡前 30 天内较少的积极医疗干预有关,包括缩短重症监护室 (ICU) 的时间[比值比 (OR) = 0.25]、气管插管率 (OR = 0.12)、呼吸机支持率 (OR = 0.20)、心肺复苏率 (OR = 0.18) 和输血率 (OR = 0.65)。在癌症和肺部疾病患者中,在最终住院超过 14 天之前接受 PCS 治疗的患者住院时间缩短(OR = 0.52 和 0.24)。肺部疾病患者入住重症监护室(OR = 0.44)和呼吸通气(OR = 0.33)的几率也明显降低:结论:姑息治疗干预的时机对住院时间和重症监护病房的停留时间以及插管程序或心肺复苏的需求有着至关重要的影响。研究结果有助于政府和医疗服务提供者制定全面的姑息关怀政策和项目,以提高关怀质量和患者权益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
HemeTEAM India: Together Everyone Achieves More. The sustainability of hospital accreditation models: A cross-sectional study. Comparative analysis of routine clinical debriefings and incident reports: insights for patient safety and teamwork enhancement. Prevalence and contributing factors of intravenous medication administration errors in emergency departments: a prospective observational study. Factors associated with harm in reported patient safety incidents and characteristics during health screenings in Korea: a secondary data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1