Promoting human rights-based deinstitutionalization in Lithuania by applying the World Health Organization's QualityRights Assessments.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal for Quality in Health Care Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzae118
Ugnė Grigaitė, Karilė Levickaitė, Dovilė Juodkaitė, Nijolė Goštautaitė-Midttun
{"title":"Promoting human rights-based deinstitutionalization in Lithuania by applying the World Health Organization's QualityRights Assessments.","authors":"Ugnė Grigaitė, Karilė Levickaitė, Dovilė Juodkaitė, Nijolė Goštautaitė-Midttun","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lithuania ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2010 and started deinstitutionalization in 2014. This reform covers segregated social care institutions where persons with mental health conditions, psychosocial, and/or intellectual disabilities live. It aims to move away from institutional care and towards community-based services. Mental healthcare services are also a part of the complex picture, undergoing its own reform since 2022. This study aims to assess the human rights conditions and standards of care in Lithuanian psychiatric and social care facilities in the context of deinstitutionalization. Data collection assessments were conducted in psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units in general hospitals, segregated social care homes, and community-based group living homes. Independent experts collected data through documentation review, observation, and semistructured interviews with service users and staff. The study followed the World Health Organization's QualityRights Toolkit methodology. In all assessed facilities, regardless of their type, the human rights of service users are often undermined, especially the right to exercise legal capacity, personal liberty and security, freedom from seclusion and restraints, and the right to live independently and be included in the community. The study reveals shortcomings in the implementation of the UNCRPD and Lithuania's attempts at deinstitutionalization. It points to key practical gaps and areas, including the vital need for better collaboration between the social and mental healthcare systems. The Lithuanian government needs to address these issues to make reforms more effective, safeguard human rights, and ensure the quality of mental health and social care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lithuania ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2010 and started deinstitutionalization in 2014. This reform covers segregated social care institutions where persons with mental health conditions, psychosocial, and/or intellectual disabilities live. It aims to move away from institutional care and towards community-based services. Mental healthcare services are also a part of the complex picture, undergoing its own reform since 2022. This study aims to assess the human rights conditions and standards of care in Lithuanian psychiatric and social care facilities in the context of deinstitutionalization. Data collection assessments were conducted in psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units in general hospitals, segregated social care homes, and community-based group living homes. Independent experts collected data through documentation review, observation, and semistructured interviews with service users and staff. The study followed the World Health Organization's QualityRights Toolkit methodology. In all assessed facilities, regardless of their type, the human rights of service users are often undermined, especially the right to exercise legal capacity, personal liberty and security, freedom from seclusion and restraints, and the right to live independently and be included in the community. The study reveals shortcomings in the implementation of the UNCRPD and Lithuania's attempts at deinstitutionalization. It points to key practical gaps and areas, including the vital need for better collaboration between the social and mental healthcare systems. The Lithuanian government needs to address these issues to make reforms more effective, safeguard human rights, and ensure the quality of mental health and social care services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立陶宛于 2010 年批准了《联合国残疾人权利公约》,并于 2014 年开始非机构化改革。这项改革涵盖有精神健康问题、社会心理和/或智力残疾的人居住的隔离式社会护理机构。其目的是从机构护理转向基于社区的服务。精神保健服务也是这一复杂局面的一部分,自 2022 年以来一直在进行改革。本研究旨在评估立陶宛精神病院和社会护理机构在非机构化背景下的人权条件和护理标准。数据收集评估工作在精神病院和综合医院的精神病科、隔离式社会护理院以及社区集体生活之家进行。独立专家通过文件审查、观察以及对服务使用者和工作人员进行半结构化访谈来收集数据。这项研究采用了世界卫生组织的 "质量权利工具包 "方法。在所有接受评估的设施中,无论其类型如何,服务使用者的人权都经常受到损害,尤其是行使法律行为能力的权利、人身自由和安全、不受隔离和限制的自由,以及独立生活和融入社区的权利。本研究揭示了立陶宛在落实《联合国残疾人权利公约》和尝试非机构化方面的不足之处。它指出了一些关键的实际差距和领域,包括社会和精神卫生保健系统之间亟需加强合作。立陶宛政府需要解决这些问题,使改革更加有效,保障人权,并确保心理健康和社会护理服务的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
HemeTEAM India: Together Everyone Achieves More. The sustainability of hospital accreditation models: A cross-sectional study. Comparative analysis of routine clinical debriefings and incident reports: insights for patient safety and teamwork enhancement. Prevalence and contributing factors of intravenous medication administration errors in emergency departments: a prospective observational study. Factors associated with harm in reported patient safety incidents and characteristics during health screenings in Korea: a secondary data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1