Three effective cases of transcatheter arterial embolization after atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Medical Case Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s13256-025-05040-5
Koji Rinka, Kiyohide Kioka, Yuga Amano, Takashi Nakai, Yasuko Kawasaki, Norifumi Kawada
{"title":"Three effective cases of transcatheter arterial embolization after atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.","authors":"Koji Rinka, Kiyohide Kioka, Yuga Amano, Takashi Nakai, Yasuko Kawasaki, Norifumi Kawada","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05040-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system classifies hepatocellular carcinoma on the basis of tumor characteristics, liver function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Hepatocellular carcinoma is divided into five stages, and the treatment options for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma have evolved in recent years. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization remains the standard treatment for intermediate-stage (stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the concepts of transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-unsuitable and transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-refractory tumors have emerged. The authors herein describe three Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab followed by transcatheter arterial embolization or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Cases 1 and 2 were transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-unsuitable, and Case 3 was transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-refractory. All patients achieved a complete response, assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The first patient was a 65-year-old Japanese man with a primary 11 cm hepatocellular carcinoma. He started treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab but developed grade 3 liver injury after two courses, leading to the discontinuation of these drugs and subsequent bland transcatheter arterial embolization. The second patient was an 82-year-old Japanese woman with multiple primary hepatocellular carcinomas. After one course of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the treatment was interrupted because of grade 3 proteinuria. Bland transcatheter arterial embolization was performed after completing one course of atezolizumab and bevacizumab and one course of atezolizumab alone. The third patient was an 83-year-old Japanese man with recurrent multiple hepatocellular carcinomas. Despite 12 courses of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the tumor in segment 4 of the liver increased in size and showed arterial-phase enhancement. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed to treat this tumor. All three patients achieved a complete response based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atezolizumab and bevacizumab followed by transcatheter arterial embolization may be an effective treatment strategy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma that is transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-refractory or transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-unsuitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05040-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system classifies hepatocellular carcinoma on the basis of tumor characteristics, liver function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Hepatocellular carcinoma is divided into five stages, and the treatment options for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma have evolved in recent years. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization remains the standard treatment for intermediate-stage (stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the concepts of transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-unsuitable and transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-refractory tumors have emerged. The authors herein describe three Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab followed by transcatheter arterial embolization or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Cases 1 and 2 were transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-unsuitable, and Case 3 was transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-refractory. All patients achieved a complete response, assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.

Case presentation: The first patient was a 65-year-old Japanese man with a primary 11 cm hepatocellular carcinoma. He started treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab but developed grade 3 liver injury after two courses, leading to the discontinuation of these drugs and subsequent bland transcatheter arterial embolization. The second patient was an 82-year-old Japanese woman with multiple primary hepatocellular carcinomas. After one course of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the treatment was interrupted because of grade 3 proteinuria. Bland transcatheter arterial embolization was performed after completing one course of atezolizumab and bevacizumab and one course of atezolizumab alone. The third patient was an 83-year-old Japanese man with recurrent multiple hepatocellular carcinomas. Despite 12 courses of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the tumor in segment 4 of the liver increased in size and showed arterial-phase enhancement. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed to treat this tumor. All three patients achieved a complete response based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.

Conclusion: Atezolizumab and bevacizumab followed by transcatheter arterial embolization may be an effective treatment strategy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma that is transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-refractory or transcatheter-arterial-chemoembolization-unsuitable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿特珠单抗和贝伐珠单抗治疗肝细胞癌后经导管动脉栓塞的三个有效病例:病例报告。
背景:巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期系统根据肿瘤特征、肝功能和东部肿瘤合作小组的表现状况对肝细胞癌进行分类。肝细胞癌分为五个阶段,近年来中期肝细胞癌的治疗方案也发生了变化。经导管动脉化疗栓塞仍然是中期(B期)肝细胞癌的标准治疗方法。然而,经导管-动脉-化疗栓塞-不适合和经导管-动脉-化疗栓塞-难治性肿瘤的概念已经出现。作者在此描述了三名日本肝癌患者,他们接受阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗治疗,随后进行经导管动脉栓塞或经导管动脉化疗栓塞。病例1、2为导管-动脉-化疗栓塞不适宜,病例3为导管-动脉-化疗栓塞难治性。所有患者均达到完全缓解,根据修订后的实体瘤指南中的缓解评价标准进行评估。病例介绍:第一位患者是一名65岁的日本男性,原发11厘米肝细胞癌。他开始使用atezolizumab和bevacizumab治疗,但在两个疗程后出现3级肝损伤,导致停药,随后进行了温和的经导管动脉栓塞。第二位患者是一名82岁的日本女性,患有多发性原发性肝细胞癌。在阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗治疗一个疗程后,由于3级蛋白尿而中断治疗。在完成一个疗程的阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗以及一个疗程的阿特唑单抗后进行温和的经导管动脉栓塞。第三例患者是一名83岁的日本男性,患有复发性多发性肝细胞癌。尽管使用了12个疗程的阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗,肝脏第4段的肿瘤体积增大,动脉期增强。经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗该肿瘤。根据修订后的实体瘤反应评价标准,所有3例患者均获得完全缓解。结论:阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗联合经导管动脉栓塞可能是经导管-动脉化疗栓塞难治性或经导管-动脉化疗栓塞不适宜的中期肝癌患者的有效治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Case Reports
Journal of Medical Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
436
期刊介绍: JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect
期刊最新文献
Challenging diagnosis: prolidase deficiency presenting as nonhealing ulcers and pancytopenia complicated by gluten enteropathy-a case report. Acute psychosis with convulsive episodes following total thyroidectomy induced by concurrent hypothyroidism and hypocalcemia: a case report. Bilateral functional hippocampectomy following recurrent bacterial meningitis: a case report. Asymptomatic multisegmental epidural hematoma following unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression: a case report. Trisomy 9 mosaicism: a genetic disorder with complications-a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1