Improving Critical Care Teamwork: Simulation-Based Interprofessional Training for Enhanced Communication and Safety.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S500890
Tzu-Ching Sung, Hsiang-Chin Hsu
{"title":"Improving Critical Care Teamwork: Simulation-Based Interprofessional Training for Enhanced Communication and Safety.","authors":"Tzu-Ching Sung, Hsiang-Chin Hsu","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S500890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates a simulation-based interprofessional education (IPE) program implemented at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital between 2018 and 2023. The program aimed to improve teamwork, communication, and collaboration among healthcare professionals in high-acuity environments such as emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, mixed-methods approach was used to assess the program's effectiveness. The study enrolled 237 participants, including postgraduate medical trainees, nurses, respiratory therapists, and administrative staff. Two high-fidelity clinical scenarios-multiple trauma and respiratory distress with shock-were designed to simulate real-world emergencies. Participants' teamwork performance was evaluated using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), while qualitative feedback was collected via structured questionnaires and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis revealed significant improvement in leadership communication (p = 0.0328) and positive trends in teamwork dimensions such as completion and effective communication. However, global team performance showed only modest numerical gains. (p=0.5201) Qualitative feedback highlighted recurring themes such as unclear task delegation, delayed recognition of patient condition changes, and inconsistent use of communication techniques like call-outs and check-backs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simulation-based IPE program significantly enhanced interprofessional collaboration and clinical competencies among participants. However, specific areas, particularly communication, leadership, and situational awareness, require further attention in future training sessions. These findings underscore the importance of continuous refinement of simulation programs to prepare healthcare teams for high-stakes clinical scenarios effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"355-367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S500890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates a simulation-based interprofessional education (IPE) program implemented at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital between 2018 and 2023. The program aimed to improve teamwork, communication, and collaboration among healthcare professionals in high-acuity environments such as emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods: A prospective, mixed-methods approach was used to assess the program's effectiveness. The study enrolled 237 participants, including postgraduate medical trainees, nurses, respiratory therapists, and administrative staff. Two high-fidelity clinical scenarios-multiple trauma and respiratory distress with shock-were designed to simulate real-world emergencies. Participants' teamwork performance was evaluated using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), while qualitative feedback was collected via structured questionnaires and thematically analyzed.

Results: Quantitative analysis revealed significant improvement in leadership communication (p = 0.0328) and positive trends in teamwork dimensions such as completion and effective communication. However, global team performance showed only modest numerical gains. (p=0.5201) Qualitative feedback highlighted recurring themes such as unclear task delegation, delayed recognition of patient condition changes, and inconsistent use of communication techniques like call-outs and check-backs.

Conclusion: The simulation-based IPE program significantly enhanced interprofessional collaboration and clinical competencies among participants. However, specific areas, particularly communication, leadership, and situational awareness, require further attention in future training sessions. These findings underscore the importance of continuous refinement of simulation programs to prepare healthcare teams for high-stakes clinical scenarios effectively.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善重症监护团队合作:基于模拟的跨专业培训,加强沟通与安全。
背景:本研究评估了国立成功大学医院在2018年至2023年间实施的基于模拟的跨专业教育(IPE)计划。该项目旨在改善急诊科和重症监护病房(icu)等高敏度环境中医疗保健专业人员之间的团队合作、沟通和协作。方法:采用前瞻性、混合方法来评估项目的有效性。该研究招募了237名参与者,包括研究生医学实习生、护士、呼吸治疗师和行政人员。设计了两个高保真的临床场景-多重创伤和呼吸窘迫伴休克-来模拟现实世界的紧急情况。采用团队应急评估量表(Team Emergency Assessment Measure)对参与者的团队合作绩效进行评估,同时通过结构化问卷收集定性反馈并进行主题分析。结果:定量分析显示,在领导沟通方面有显著改善(p = 0.0328),在团队合作方面如完成度和有效沟通方面有积极的趋势。然而,全球团队的表现只显示出适度的数字增长。(p=0.5201)定性反馈强调了反复出现的主题,如任务分配不明确,对患者病情变化的识别延迟,以及呼叫和检查等沟通技术的使用不一致。结论:基于模拟的IPE项目显著增强了参与者之间的跨专业协作和临床能力。然而,具体领域,特别是沟通、领导力和态势感知,需要在未来的培训课程中进一步关注。这些发现强调了持续改进模拟程序的重要性,以使医疗团队有效地为高风险临床场景做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records Among Practitioner Nurses and Nurse Managers Using the UTAUT Framework in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review. Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Low-Temperature Plasma Adenotonsillectomy for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Rapid Detection and Diagnosis of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis Based on Integrated YOLOv12n and ResNet34 Framework Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Systematic Review of the Intraoperative Hypothermia Risk Prediction Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients. Ready, Set, Coach: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study Exploring the Impact of Implementation Coaching to Optimize the Allied Health Assistant Workforce in Public Health Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1