Gennaro Musella, Federica Canfora, Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio, Emmanouil Vardas, Maria Kouri, Nikolaos Nikitakis, Giuseppe Troiano, Massimo Aria, Luca D'Aniello, Lorenzo Lo Muzio, Michele Davide Mignogna, Daniela Adamo
{"title":"Oral Dysaesthetic and Perceptual Disorder, a Distinct Subset of Chronic Orofacial Pain Without Burning Symptoms: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Gennaro Musella, Federica Canfora, Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio, Emmanouil Vardas, Maria Kouri, Nikolaos Nikitakis, Giuseppe Troiano, Massimo Aria, Luca D'Aniello, Lorenzo Lo Muzio, Michele Davide Mignogna, Daniela Adamo","doi":"10.1111/joor.13945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the ICOP 2020, burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic orofacial pain disorder characterised by an intraoral burning sensation, which represents the main diagnostic criterion. However, some patients experience other symptoms such as xerostomia, taste alterations and globus, without the burning sensation (non-BMS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore non-BMS as a distinct subclinical entity by comparing the classical BMS with this new group of patients in a case-control study, addressing gaps in current diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>83 non-BMS patients were compared with an equal number of BMS patients matched for age and sex. Data on sociodemographic and risk factors, systemic comorbidities and drug intake, symptom patterns, psychological profiles were collected and statistically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences between BMS and non-BMS groups were found in sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, drug consumption and extraoral symptoms. Both groups reported similar symptoms patterns, with discomfort intensifying in the evening. Although oral symptoms prevalence varied, with the burning sensation exclusive to BMS patients, none of these differences reached statistical significance. Psychological assessments revealed mild depression (17 [14-19] vs. 17 [14-20], p < 0.981), mild to moderate anxiety (18 [15-21] vs. 17 [15-20.5], p < 0.767) and sleep disturbance (5 [4-7] vs. 8 [5-10], p < 0.001) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-BMS patients exhibit similarities to BMS patients yet remain unclassified under current diagnostic criteria. Therefore, we have suggested the term \"Oral Dysaesthetic and Perceptual Disorder (ODPD)\" to define these patients (non-BMS). This study emphasises the need to expand diagnostic criteria to better identify and manage ODPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: According to the ICOP 2020, burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic orofacial pain disorder characterised by an intraoral burning sensation, which represents the main diagnostic criterion. However, some patients experience other symptoms such as xerostomia, taste alterations and globus, without the burning sensation (non-BMS).
Objective: This study aims to explore non-BMS as a distinct subclinical entity by comparing the classical BMS with this new group of patients in a case-control study, addressing gaps in current diagnostic criteria.
Methods: 83 non-BMS patients were compared with an equal number of BMS patients matched for age and sex. Data on sociodemographic and risk factors, systemic comorbidities and drug intake, symptom patterns, psychological profiles were collected and statistically analysed.
Results: No significant differences between BMS and non-BMS groups were found in sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, drug consumption and extraoral symptoms. Both groups reported similar symptoms patterns, with discomfort intensifying in the evening. Although oral symptoms prevalence varied, with the burning sensation exclusive to BMS patients, none of these differences reached statistical significance. Psychological assessments revealed mild depression (17 [14-19] vs. 17 [14-20], p < 0.981), mild to moderate anxiety (18 [15-21] vs. 17 [15-20.5], p < 0.767) and sleep disturbance (5 [4-7] vs. 8 [5-10], p < 0.001) in both groups.
Conclusion: Non-BMS patients exhibit similarities to BMS patients yet remain unclassified under current diagnostic criteria. Therefore, we have suggested the term "Oral Dysaesthetic and Perceptual Disorder (ODPD)" to define these patients (non-BMS). This study emphasises the need to expand diagnostic criteria to better identify and manage ODPD patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.