An Artificial Intelligence Model Using Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Metrics Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004456
Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito
{"title":"An Artificial Intelligence Model Using Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Metrics Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) prior to biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences prior to prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI-metrics as input <i>classifiers</i> and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density, and PI-RADS) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score <u>></u>7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (OR 2.04, 95%CI 1.52-2.73, p<0.01), as were PSA density (OR 2.02, 95%CI 1.21-3.35, p=0.01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, p=0.01; OR 9.67, 95%CI 2.89-32.7, for PI-RADS 4-5, p<0.01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSA density + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs. 0.859, p=0.89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, p<0.01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared to biopsy for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our <i>DBSI</i>-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) prior to biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.

Materials and methods: Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences prior to prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI-metrics as input classifiers and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density, and PI-RADS) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score >7.

Results: The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (OR 2.04, 95%CI 1.52-2.73, p<0.01), as were PSA density (OR 2.02, 95%CI 1.21-3.35, p=0.01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, p=0.01; OR 9.67, 95%CI 2.89-32.7, for PI-RADS 4-5, p<0.01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSA density + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs. 0.859, p=0.89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, p<0.01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared to biopsy for all).

Conclusions: Our DBSI-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Comment. Multi-Institutional Analysis of Surgery for Lichen Sclerosus-Induced Penile Urethral Stricture: Establishing Single-Stage Urethroplasty as a Primary Treatment Option. Editorial Comment. Letter: Artificial Intelligence as a Discriminator of Competence in Urological Training: Are We There? Editorial Comment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1