Correlates of Protection Against Symptomatic COVID-19: The CORSER 5 Case-Control Study.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf006
Léopold Beeker, Thomas Obadia, Emma Bloch, Laura Garcia, Manon Le Fol, Tiffany Charmet, Laurence Arowas, Rémy Artus, Olivia Cheny, Dorian Cheval, Yanis Dahoumane, Maurine Delhaye, Delal Ergen, Mariem Essaidani, Christine Fanaud, Sandrine Fernandes Pellerin, Nathalie Jolly, Hélène Laude, Emmanuel Roux, Marine Samson, Linda Sangari, Marie-Noëlle Ungeheuer, Sophie Vacant, Ayla Zayoud, Françoise Donnadieu, Stéphane Pelleau, Simon Galmiche, Arnaud Fontanet, Michael White
{"title":"Correlates of Protection Against Symptomatic COVID-19: The CORSER 5 Case-Control Study.","authors":"Léopold Beeker, Thomas Obadia, Emma Bloch, Laura Garcia, Manon Le Fol, Tiffany Charmet, Laurence Arowas, Rémy Artus, Olivia Cheny, Dorian Cheval, Yanis Dahoumane, Maurine Delhaye, Delal Ergen, Mariem Essaidani, Christine Fanaud, Sandrine Fernandes Pellerin, Nathalie Jolly, Hélène Laude, Emmanuel Roux, Marine Samson, Linda Sangari, Marie-Noëlle Ungeheuer, Sophie Vacant, Ayla Zayoud, Françoise Donnadieu, Stéphane Pelleau, Simon Galmiche, Arnaud Fontanet, Michael White","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Establishing correlates of protection often requires large cohorts. A rapid and adaptable case-control study design can be used to identify antibody correlates of protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in serum and saliva.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a case-control study to compare antibody levels between cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days of symptom onset and uninfected controls. Controls were matched on age, number of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine doses, time since last dose, and past episodes of infection. We quantified anti-SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal coronavirus immunoglobulin (Ig) G in serum and saliva at inclusion, 1 month, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 90 cases and 62 controls between February and September 2022. A boost and decay pattern of serum antibodies was observed in cases at 1 and 6 months, respectively, but not in controls. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were significantly higher in controls at inclusion both in serum (particularly antinucleocapsid IgG: 4.14 times higher compared with cases; 95% CI, 2.46-6.96) and saliva (particularly antispike for Delta variant IgG: 4.89 times higher compared with cases; 95% CI, 2.91-9.89). Saliva antibodies generally outperformed serum antibodies for case/control differentiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this case-control study, we provided evidence of correlates of protection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in saliva and serum, with saliva antibodies often outperforming serum. The finding that antibodies in saliva are a better correlate of protection than antibodies in serum may inform vaccine development by highlighting the importance of robust induction of mucosal immune responses. This study design may be used during future epidemics for the prompt assessment of correlates of protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 1","pages":"ofaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Establishing correlates of protection often requires large cohorts. A rapid and adaptable case-control study design can be used to identify antibody correlates of protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in serum and saliva.

Methods: We designed a case-control study to compare antibody levels between cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days of symptom onset and uninfected controls. Controls were matched on age, number of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine doses, time since last dose, and past episodes of infection. We quantified anti-SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal coronavirus immunoglobulin (Ig) G in serum and saliva at inclusion, 1 month, and 6 months.

Results: We included 90 cases and 62 controls between February and September 2022. A boost and decay pattern of serum antibodies was observed in cases at 1 and 6 months, respectively, but not in controls. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were significantly higher in controls at inclusion both in serum (particularly antinucleocapsid IgG: 4.14 times higher compared with cases; 95% CI, 2.46-6.96) and saliva (particularly antispike for Delta variant IgG: 4.89 times higher compared with cases; 95% CI, 2.91-9.89). Saliva antibodies generally outperformed serum antibodies for case/control differentiation.

Conclusions: In this case-control study, we provided evidence of correlates of protection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in saliva and serum, with saliva antibodies often outperforming serum. The finding that antibodies in saliva are a better correlate of protection than antibodies in serum may inform vaccine development by highlighting the importance of robust induction of mucosal immune responses. This study design may be used during future epidemics for the prompt assessment of correlates of protection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防症状性COVID-19的相关因素:CORSER 5病例对照研究
背景:建立相关的保护往往需要大的队列。一种快速、适应性强的病例对照研究设计可用于鉴定血清和唾液中预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染的相关抗体。方法:设计病例-对照研究,比较症状出现后5天内SARS-CoV-2感染病例和未感染对照组的抗体水平。对照组在年龄、2019冠状病毒病疫苗剂量、自上次剂量以来的时间和过去的感染发作等方面进行了匹配。我们定量测定纳入、1个月和6个月时血清和唾液中的抗sars - cov -2和季节性冠状病毒免疫球蛋白(Ig) G。结果:我们在2022年2月至9月期间纳入了90例病例和62例对照。在1个月和6个月的病例中分别观察到血清抗体的增强和衰减模式,但在对照组中没有。对照组血清中抗sars - cov -2抗体水平显著高于对照组(特别是抗核衣壳IgG:比病例高4.14倍;95% CI, 2.46-6.96)和唾液(特别是δ变异IgG抗尖峰抗体:比病例高4.89倍;95% ci, 2.91-9.89)。在病例/对照分化中,唾液抗体通常优于血清抗体。结论:在本病例对照研究中,我们提供了唾液和血清中抗sars - cov -2 IgG保护相关的证据,唾液抗体往往优于血清。唾液中的抗体比血清中的抗体具有更好的保护作用,这一发现可能通过强调强烈诱导粘膜免疫反应的重要性,为疫苗的开发提供信息。该研究设计可用于未来流行期间对保护相关因素的及时评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Standardizing Antimicrobial Use in a Resource-Limited Pediatric Surgical Unit in Botswana. A Costing Analysis of a Nurse- and Peer-Led Mobile Model of Hepatitis C Care Adjacent to the Community Corrections Setting. Early Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation During Primary HIV Infection Restricts HIV Reservoirs and Gut-Driven Inflammation but Fails to Rewire the Systemic Cytokine Landscape. From Crisis to Control: A Study of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine Efficacy in Harare, Zimbabwe (2017-2024). Trends in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mortality Within a US Academic Health System, 2020-2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1