Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06732-8
Suksan Kanoksin, Bhapapak Na Songkhla, Amarit Tansawet, Issaree Laopeamthong, Pakkapol Sukhvibul, Suphakarn Techapongsatorn
{"title":"Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students.","authors":"Suksan Kanoksin, Bhapapak Na Songkhla, Amarit Tansawet, Issaree Laopeamthong, Pakkapol Sukhvibul, Suphakarn Techapongsatorn","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06732-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A mastery of life-threatening trauma procedures is important for medical students aiming to become proficient physicians. Thus, this study compares the effectiveness of deliberate practice with that of conventional lecture methods in teaching such students these essential skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 48 first- to third-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital at Navamindradhiraj University (Thailand). The participants were randomly assigned to either the deliberate practice group (n = 24) or the conventional lecture group (n = 24). The primary outcome was the students' scores on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), whereas the secondary outcome was their overall grades. Moreover, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to control for the impacts of gender and academic year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The deliberate practice group had significantly higher OSCE scores (mean = 69.79, SD = 9.49) than did the conventional lecture group (mean = 51.38, SD = 14.59), with a p value of 0.000002. Additionally, the deliberate practice group had no clear failures or seven good passes, whereas the conventional lecture group had five clear failures and no good passes. Moreover, the ANCOVA results indicated that the type of training had a significant positive effect on the students' examination scores, independent of gender and academic year (F (4, 43) = 7.44, p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deliberate practice is significantly more effective than the conventional lecture method in teaching life-threatening trauma procedures to medical students. The implication of these findings is that implementing deliberate practice in medical education can enhance the competencies of students, improve their preparedness for real-world clinical settings, and produce better patient outcomes. However, future research should examine the broader applications and long-term benefits of this method in medical training.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TCTR20240816009.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06732-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A mastery of life-threatening trauma procedures is important for medical students aiming to become proficient physicians. Thus, this study compares the effectiveness of deliberate practice with that of conventional lecture methods in teaching such students these essential skills.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 48 first- to third-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital at Navamindradhiraj University (Thailand). The participants were randomly assigned to either the deliberate practice group (n = 24) or the conventional lecture group (n = 24). The primary outcome was the students' scores on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), whereas the secondary outcome was their overall grades. Moreover, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to control for the impacts of gender and academic year.

Results: The deliberate practice group had significantly higher OSCE scores (mean = 69.79, SD = 9.49) than did the conventional lecture group (mean = 51.38, SD = 14.59), with a p value of 0.000002. Additionally, the deliberate practice group had no clear failures or seven good passes, whereas the conventional lecture group had five clear failures and no good passes. Moreover, the ANCOVA results indicated that the type of training had a significant positive effect on the students' examination scores, independent of gender and academic year (F (4, 43) = 7.44, p = 0.0001).

Conclusion: Deliberate practice is significantly more effective than the conventional lecture method in teaching life-threatening trauma procedures to medical students. The implication of these findings is that implementing deliberate practice in medical education can enhance the competencies of students, improve their preparedness for real-world clinical settings, and produce better patient outcomes. However, future research should examine the broader applications and long-term benefits of this method in medical training.

Trial registration: TCTR20240816009.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生创伤训练中刻意练习与传统讲座的效果比较。
背景:掌握危及生命的创伤程序是重要的医学生的目标是成为熟练的医生。因此,本研究比较了刻意练习和传统讲座方法在教授这些基本技能方面的有效性。方法:对泰国Navamindradhiraj大学医学院Vajira医院的48名一至三年级医学生进行随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到刻意练习组(n = 24)和传统讲座组(n = 24)。主要结果是学生在客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)上的分数,而次要结果是他们的总体成绩。此外,采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)来控制性别和学年的影响。结果:刻意练习组OSCE得分(均值= 69.79,SD = 9.49)显著高于常规授课组(均值= 51.38,SD = 14.59),差异有统计学意义(p值为0.000002)。此外,刻意练习组没有明显的失败,有7次通过,而传统讲座组有5次明显失败,没有一次通过。此外,ANCOVA结果表明,训练类型对学生考试成绩有显著的正影响,与性别和学年无关(F (4,43) = 7.44, p = 0.0001)。结论:在对医学生进行危及生命的创伤手术教学中,刻意练习的效果明显优于传统的讲授方法。这些发现的含义是,在医学教育中实施刻意练习可以提高学生的能力,改善他们对现实世界临床环境的准备,并产生更好的患者结果。然而,未来的研究应该检查这种方法在医学培训中的更广泛应用和长期效益。试验注册:TCTR20240816009。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Beyond learning preferences: exploring the relationship between learning styles and sensory processing among university students. Profile of anatomy teachers of students in healthcare professions: a scoping review. Enhancing dental clinical education through AI: insights into post-clinical summaries. Protection or constraint? A phenomenological study of the learning experience among doctors receiving postgraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Continuing medical education in renal pathology: current practices and needs among nephrologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1