Poor scholarship and unacknowledged bias: Commentary on Walker et al. (2025).

IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Psychologist Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1037/amp0001433
Roy Eidelson
{"title":"Poor scholarship and unacknowledged bias: Commentary on Walker et al. (2025).","authors":"Roy Eidelson","doi":"10.1037/amp0001433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article by Walker et al. (2025) titled \"The American Psychological Association and Antisemitism: Toward Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion\" regrettably suffers from serious shortcomings in regard to scholarship. These include flawed analyses, an overreliance on unreliable and biased sources, and the presentation of provocative and significant claims without any documentation at all. There is no question that deep fears about resurgent antisemitism are legitimate and deserving of dedicated attention. However, as summarized here, on multiple fronts, this article fails to accurately illuminate these risks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"80 1","pages":"120-121"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article by Walker et al. (2025) titled "The American Psychological Association and Antisemitism: Toward Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion" regrettably suffers from serious shortcomings in regard to scholarship. These include flawed analyses, an overreliance on unreliable and biased sources, and the presentation of provocative and significant claims without any documentation at all. There is no question that deep fears about resurgent antisemitism are legitimate and deserving of dedicated attention. However, as summarized here, on multiple fronts, this article fails to accurately illuminate these risks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拙劣的学术研究和未被承认的偏见:对Walker等人(2025)的评论。
沃克等人(2025)的一篇名为《美国心理协会和反犹主义:走向平等、多样性和包容性》的文章在学术研究方面存在严重缺陷,令人遗憾。这些错误包括有缺陷的分析,过度依赖不可靠和有偏见的来源,以及在没有任何文件的情况下提出具有挑衅性和重大意义的主张。毫无疑问,对反犹主义死灰复燃的深切担忧是合理的,值得我们特别关注。然而,正如这里总结的那样,在多个方面,本文未能准确地阐明这些风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
期刊最新文献
Linking psychological distress and multilevel socioeconomic disadvantage: A representative population-based study of 15,851 U.K. adults. Patrick W. Corrigan (1956-2026). Still WEIRD, still underreported: An updated benchmark for psychological science. Charles J. Gelso (1941–2025). L. Rowell Huesmann (1943-2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1