Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Treatment Planning for Clinicians Who Treat Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-2023-0017
Juanita C Perkins, Ragan Johnson, Shana Williams Davis
{"title":"Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Treatment Planning for Clinicians Who Treat Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Juanita C Perkins, Ragan Johnson, Shana Williams Davis","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling clinicians and patients to make health care decisions as partners. However, its implementation in mental health care has been a slow process. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study was to implement SDM during outpatient mental health treatment planning. <b>Methods:</b> In an integrated health care clinic, mental health clinicians (<i>n</i> = 4) participated in SDM training to increase their use of SDM. The 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire Physician Version (SDM-Q9-DOC) tool was used in a pre-post design to evaluate the training's effectiveness in increasing the implementation of SDM during treatment planning. <b>Results:</b> SDM-Q9-DOC scores improved from a median of 49-54, suggesting a clinically significant improvement in SDM implementation. Project limitations included short duration and lack of feedback from clinicians and patients about their SDM experience. <b>Conclusions:</b> While guided SDM training can increase the use of SDM in outpatient mental health care, we acknowledge the existing barriers to its implementation. These barriers, including clinician pessimism, time constraints, lack of appropriate decision aids, and workplace expectations, should be further studied and addressed to enhance the implementation of SDM in the mental health setting. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> Psychiatric nurse practitioners and registered nurses can assist with implementing SDM by encouraging effective communication between clinicians and behavioral health clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling clinicians and patients to make health care decisions as partners. However, its implementation in mental health care has been a slow process. Objective: The objective of the study was to implement SDM during outpatient mental health treatment planning. Methods: In an integrated health care clinic, mental health clinicians (n = 4) participated in SDM training to increase their use of SDM. The 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire Physician Version (SDM-Q9-DOC) tool was used in a pre-post design to evaluate the training's effectiveness in increasing the implementation of SDM during treatment planning. Results: SDM-Q9-DOC scores improved from a median of 49-54, suggesting a clinically significant improvement in SDM implementation. Project limitations included short duration and lack of feedback from clinicians and patients about their SDM experience. Conclusions: While guided SDM training can increase the use of SDM in outpatient mental health care, we acknowledge the existing barriers to its implementation. These barriers, including clinician pessimism, time constraints, lack of appropriate decision aids, and workplace expectations, should be further studied and addressed to enhance the implementation of SDM in the mental health setting. Implications for Nursing: Psychiatric nurse practitioners and registered nurses can assist with implementing SDM by encouraging effective communication between clinicians and behavioral health clients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Accurate Delirium Detection in Older Patients With Heart Failure: Integrating Education and an Electronic Health Record Tool for Nurses. Pilot Feasibility Study for Implementing a Peer-Facilitated Diabetes Prevention Program With Homeless Men: Significant Weight Loss and Improved Health Behaviors Despite Employment Barriers and Limited Access to Healthy Foods. Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects. Implementation of a Volume-Based Technique for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation: A Quality Improvement Project. Motivational Interviewing to Address Vaccine Hesitancy in a Rural Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1