Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062
Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe
{"title":"Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.","authors":"Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. <b>Methods:</b> Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. <b>Results:</b> Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. <b>Conclusions:</b> The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. Objective: The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. Methods: Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. Results: Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. Conclusions: The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. Implications for Nursing: The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects. Implementation of a Volume-Based Technique for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation: A Quality Improvement Project. Motivational Interviewing to Address Vaccine Hesitancy in a Rural Population. A Community Initiative to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Awareness, and Intent to Screen in an Underserved Region. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve First-Case On-Time Starts for Elective Surgeries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1