Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Environmental Microbiome Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9
Hao-Ran Li, Xiang-Yu Zhang, Kai-Ling He, Xin Xu, Xin-Wen Chen, Yaseen Ullah, Ting-Ting Zhang, Yan Chen, Chuan-Chao Dai, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.","authors":"Hao-Ran Li, Xiang-Yu Zhang, Kai-Ling He, Xin Xu, Xin-Wen Chen, Yaseen Ullah, Ting-Ting Zhang, Yan Chen, Chuan-Chao Dai, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous monocultures alter the composition and function of root-associated microbiota, and thus compromise crop health and productivity. In comparison, little is known about how leaf-associated microbiota respond to continuous monocultures. Here, we profiled root and leaf-associated microbiota of peanut plants under monocropping and rotation conditions. Additionally, their protective effects against root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum and leaf pathogen Alternaria alstroemeriae were evaluated. We found that monocropping increased root and leaf disease severity. Meanwhile, the peanut growth and productivity were inhibited by monocropping. Microbiota analysis revealed that monocropping reduced rhizosphere microbial population and diversity, while increased leaf epiphytic microbial population and did not influence leaf epiphytic microbial diversity. Cropping conditions had a greater impact on the microbiota composition of leaf epiphytes than that of the rhizosphere. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments, combined with correlation analyses showed that monocropping weakened the antagonistic activity of rhizosphere microbiota against F. oxysporum and root rot disease. This effect may be associated with the depletion of Bacillus sp. and Sphingomonas sp.. By contrast, leaf epiphytic microbiota under monocropping exhibited greater inhibition of A. alstroemeriae growth and leaf spot control. Together, our results demonstrated a differential response pattern of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48553,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiome","volume":"20 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous monocultures alter the composition and function of root-associated microbiota, and thus compromise crop health and productivity. In comparison, little is known about how leaf-associated microbiota respond to continuous monocultures. Here, we profiled root and leaf-associated microbiota of peanut plants under monocropping and rotation conditions. Additionally, their protective effects against root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum and leaf pathogen Alternaria alstroemeriae were evaluated. We found that monocropping increased root and leaf disease severity. Meanwhile, the peanut growth and productivity were inhibited by monocropping. Microbiota analysis revealed that monocropping reduced rhizosphere microbial population and diversity, while increased leaf epiphytic microbial population and did not influence leaf epiphytic microbial diversity. Cropping conditions had a greater impact on the microbiota composition of leaf epiphytes than that of the rhizosphere. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments, combined with correlation analyses showed that monocropping weakened the antagonistic activity of rhizosphere microbiota against F. oxysporum and root rot disease. This effect may be associated with the depletion of Bacillus sp. and Sphingomonas sp.. By contrast, leaf epiphytic microbiota under monocropping exhibited greater inhibition of A. alstroemeriae growth and leaf spot control. Together, our results demonstrated a differential response pattern of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根和叶相关微生物群对连续单一栽培的差异反应。
连续的单一栽培改变了根相关微生物群的组成和功能,从而损害了作物的健康和生产力。相比之下,人们对叶片相关微生物群对连续单一培养的反应知之甚少。在这里,我们分析了单作和轮作条件下花生根系和叶片相关微生物群。此外,还评价了它们对根系病原菌尖孢镰刀菌和叶片病原菌褐花菌的保护作用。我们发现,单作增加了根系和叶片病害的严重程度。同时,单作也抑制了花生的生长和产量。微生物区系分析表明,单作减少了根际微生物数量和多样性,增加了叶片附生微生物数量,但对叶片附生微生物多样性没有影响。种植条件对叶片附生菌群组成的影响大于对根际菌群组成的影响。此外,体外和体内试验结合相关分析表明,单作降低了根际微生物群对尖孢镰刀菌和根腐病的拮抗活性。这种效应可能与芽孢杆菌和鞘氨单胞菌的耗竭有关。而单作条件下,叶片附生微生物群对桤木生长和叶斑病的抑制作用更大。总之,我们的结果证明了根和叶相关微生物群对连续单一培养的不同反应模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiome
Environmental Microbiome Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Microorganisms, omnipresent across Earth's diverse environments, play a crucial role in adapting to external changes, influencing Earth's systems and cycles, and contributing significantly to agricultural practices. Through applied microbiology, they offer solutions to various everyday needs. Environmental Microbiome recognizes the universal presence and significance of microorganisms, inviting submissions that explore the diverse facets of environmental and applied microbiological research.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the colonization process of microeukaryotic communities on artificial micro-ecological islands. Evidence for cable bacteria inhabiting deep in anoxic sediment reveals a novel ecological niche. Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics. Urban forest restoration enhances soil microbial functional potential and functional insurance via shifts in β-diversity. Distinct taxonomic signatures in the rhizobiome of two native plants from the polyextreme Salar de Huasco ecosystem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1