Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Environmental Microbiome Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9
Hao-Ran Li, Xiang-Yu Zhang, Kai-Ling He, Xin Xu, Xin-Wen Chen, Yaseen Ullah, Ting-Ting Zhang, Yan Chen, Chuan-Chao Dai, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.","authors":"Hao-Ran Li, Xiang-Yu Zhang, Kai-Ling He, Xin Xu, Xin-Wen Chen, Yaseen Ullah, Ting-Ting Zhang, Yan Chen, Chuan-Chao Dai, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous monocultures alter the composition and function of root-associated microbiota, and thus compromise crop health and productivity. In comparison, little is known about how leaf-associated microbiota respond to continuous monocultures. Here, we profiled root and leaf-associated microbiota of peanut plants under monocropping and rotation conditions. Additionally, their protective effects against root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum and leaf pathogen Alternaria alstroemeriae were evaluated. We found that monocropping increased root and leaf disease severity. Meanwhile, the peanut growth and productivity were inhibited by monocropping. Microbiota analysis revealed that monocropping reduced rhizosphere microbial population and diversity, while increased leaf epiphytic microbial population and did not influence leaf epiphytic microbial diversity. Cropping conditions had a greater impact on the microbiota composition of leaf epiphytes than that of the rhizosphere. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments, combined with correlation analyses showed that monocropping weakened the antagonistic activity of rhizosphere microbiota against F. oxysporum and root rot disease. This effect may be associated with the depletion of Bacillus sp. and Sphingomonas sp.. By contrast, leaf epiphytic microbiota under monocropping exhibited greater inhibition of A. alstroemeriae growth and leaf spot control. Together, our results demonstrated a differential response pattern of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48553,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiome","volume":"20 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous monocultures alter the composition and function of root-associated microbiota, and thus compromise crop health and productivity. In comparison, little is known about how leaf-associated microbiota respond to continuous monocultures. Here, we profiled root and leaf-associated microbiota of peanut plants under monocropping and rotation conditions. Additionally, their protective effects against root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum and leaf pathogen Alternaria alstroemeriae were evaluated. We found that monocropping increased root and leaf disease severity. Meanwhile, the peanut growth and productivity were inhibited by monocropping. Microbiota analysis revealed that monocropping reduced rhizosphere microbial population and diversity, while increased leaf epiphytic microbial population and did not influence leaf epiphytic microbial diversity. Cropping conditions had a greater impact on the microbiota composition of leaf epiphytes than that of the rhizosphere. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments, combined with correlation analyses showed that monocropping weakened the antagonistic activity of rhizosphere microbiota against F. oxysporum and root rot disease. This effect may be associated with the depletion of Bacillus sp. and Sphingomonas sp.. By contrast, leaf epiphytic microbiota under monocropping exhibited greater inhibition of A. alstroemeriae growth and leaf spot control. Together, our results demonstrated a differential response pattern of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiome
Environmental Microbiome Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Microorganisms, omnipresent across Earth's diverse environments, play a crucial role in adapting to external changes, influencing Earth's systems and cycles, and contributing significantly to agricultural practices. Through applied microbiology, they offer solutions to various everyday needs. Environmental Microbiome recognizes the universal presence and significance of microorganisms, inviting submissions that explore the diverse facets of environmental and applied microbiological research.
期刊最新文献
Soil organic matter composition affects ecosystem multifunctionality by mediating the composition of microbial communities in long-term restored meadows. Spatial and temporal variation of Antarctic microbial interactions: a study around the west Antarctic Peninsula. Phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses impact the structure and composition of the bacterial phyllosphere microbiome of Arabidopsis. Metabolic redundancy and specialisation of novel sulfide-oxidizing Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum along the brine-seawater interface of the Kebrit Deep. A systematic scoping review reveals that geographic and taxonomic patterns influence the scientific and societal interest in urban soil microbial diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1