Evaluating dental students' satisfaction in clinical Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06720-y
Jawaher Abu Wathlan, Hussam Alqahtani
{"title":"Evaluating dental students' satisfaction in clinical Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jawaher Abu Wathlan, Hussam Alqahtani","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06720-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) in Saudi Arabia underscores the importance of assessing student satisfaction to ensure program quality. No previous studies have explored the satisfaction levels of dental students enrolled in clinical Periodontics courses at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS). This study aims to assess dental students' satisfaction with clinical Periodontics courses and to explore potential differences in satisfaction based on gender and academic level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed dental students enrolled in Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS during the 2022-2023 academic year. A web-based questionnaire was distributed via email. The survey covered six categories: learning objectives, course materials, content relevance, instructor knowledge, delivery style, and facility environment. Responses were analyzed using chi-square tests for gender differences and t-tests to compare satisfaction between third- and fourth-year students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a balanced distribution of male (47.92%) and female (52.08%) participants, with 68.75% in their third year and 31.25% in their fourth year. Overall, students reported high satisfaction, with over 90% agreeing they understood the learning objectives and felt confident in applying their knowledge. No significant differences were found between male and female students (mean scores: 95.49 vs. 95.48) or between third- and fourth-year students (mean scores: 95.56 vs. 95.31), indicating consistent satisfaction across these groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High levels of satisfaction with clinical Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS suggest effective course design, clear objectives, and relevant content. The lack of significant associations with gender or academic level implies a uniformly positive educational experience. These findings underscore the importance of aligning course design with best practices in dental education to ensure graduates are well-prepared for clinical practice on a global scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06720-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) in Saudi Arabia underscores the importance of assessing student satisfaction to ensure program quality. No previous studies have explored the satisfaction levels of dental students enrolled in clinical Periodontics courses at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS). This study aims to assess dental students' satisfaction with clinical Periodontics courses and to explore potential differences in satisfaction based on gender and academic level.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed dental students enrolled in Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS during the 2022-2023 academic year. A web-based questionnaire was distributed via email. The survey covered six categories: learning objectives, course materials, content relevance, instructor knowledge, delivery style, and facility environment. Responses were analyzed using chi-square tests for gender differences and t-tests to compare satisfaction between third- and fourth-year students.

Results: The study included a balanced distribution of male (47.92%) and female (52.08%) participants, with 68.75% in their third year and 31.25% in their fourth year. Overall, students reported high satisfaction, with over 90% agreeing they understood the learning objectives and felt confident in applying their knowledge. No significant differences were found between male and female students (mean scores: 95.49 vs. 95.48) or between third- and fourth-year students (mean scores: 95.56 vs. 95.31), indicating consistent satisfaction across these groups.

Conclusion: High levels of satisfaction with clinical Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS suggest effective course design, clear objectives, and relevant content. The lack of significant associations with gender or academic level implies a uniformly positive educational experience. These findings underscore the importance of aligning course design with best practices in dental education to ensure graduates are well-prepared for clinical practice on a global scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估ksa - hs牙科学生对临床牙周病课程的满意度:一项横断面研究。
背景:沙特阿拉伯国家学术认证和评估委员会(NCAAA)强调评估学生满意度对确保课程质量的重要性。以前没有研究探索在沙特国王本阿卜杜勒阿齐兹健康科学大学(ksa - hs)参加临床牙周病课程的牙科学生的满意度。本研究旨在评估牙科学生对临床牙周病课程的满意度,并探讨性别和学术水平对满意度的潜在差异。方法:这项横断面研究调查了2022-2023学年在ksu - hs参加牙周病课程的牙科学生。一份基于网络的调查问卷通过电子邮件分发。调查涵盖六个方面:学习目标、课程材料、内容相关性、教师知识、授课方式和设施环境。使用卡方检验来分析性别差异,使用t检验来比较三年级和四年级学生的满意度。结果:研究对象男占47.92%,女占52.08%,其中大三占68.75%,大四占31.25%。总体而言,学生的满意度很高,超过90%的学生认为他们理解了学习目标,并对应用所学知识充满信心。男女学生之间(平均分数:95.49比95.48)或三年级和四年级学生之间(平均分数:95.56比95.31)没有显著差异,表明这些群体的满意度是一致的。结论:我校临床牙周病课程设计有效、目标明确、内容相关,教学满意度高。缺乏与性别或学术水平的显著联系意味着一个统一的积极的教育经验。这些发现强调了将课程设计与牙科教育最佳实践相结合的重要性,以确保毕业生为全球范围内的临床实践做好充分准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Construction and practice of a certification system for clinical nursing preceptors: a " license to teach" approach in China. Reforming hospital management education with the P-MASE pedagogy: a randomized controlled trial. Lessons learned from adapting the nursing practicum during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Educational activities as a pathway to postgraduate standardization: a qualitative study. Educational assessments in entry-level physical therapy education: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1