Feasibility and Acceptability of Engaging Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia With Electronic Outreach for Deprescribing.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf028
Katharina Tabea Jungo, Niteesh K Choudhry, Edward R Marcantonio, Gauri Bhatkhande, Katherine L Crum, Nancy Haff, Kaitlin E Hanken, Julie C Lauffenburger
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Engaging Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia With Electronic Outreach for Deprescribing.","authors":"Katharina Tabea Jungo, Niteesh K Choudhry, Edward R Marcantonio, Gauri Bhatkhande, Katherine L Crum, Nancy Haff, Kaitlin E Hanken, Julie C Lauffenburger","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Care partners are critical for making treatment decisions in persons living with dementia. However, identifying them is challenging, hindering the broader use of interventions, such as those using digital technologies. We aimed to (i) assess the feasibility of identifying and contacting care partners using electronic health record (EHR) systems, and (ii) elicit their perspectives on electronic interventions for deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We systematically identified care partners of persons living with dementia ≥65 years of age via structured EHR data in a large health care system. Eligible care partners were contacted by patient portal (if they were an established proxy), mail, and phone to complete a survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,138 eligible persons living with dementia identified, 1,084 (26%) had a care partner name recorded in the EHR. Out of 259 (6%) with sufficient care partner contact information for outreach, 74 (29%) completed the survey. Among care partners, 62 (84%) reported being confident in managing dementia medications, 59 (80%) were willing to stop ≥1 medications, and 43 (58%) were very/extremely interested in using digital tools for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Despite the low percentage of care partners with sufficient contact information, reach rates were high for contacted care partners, suggesting feasibility for pragmatic system-level interventions. Most care partners showed great interest in using digital health tools for decision-making and managing medications. Therefore, electronic tools could help with identifying care partners and engaging them. However, scaling up interventions requires better care partner documentation or extracting information from free text.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Care partners are critical for making treatment decisions in persons living with dementia. However, identifying them is challenging, hindering the broader use of interventions, such as those using digital technologies. We aimed to (i) assess the feasibility of identifying and contacting care partners using electronic health record (EHR) systems, and (ii) elicit their perspectives on electronic interventions for deprescribing.

Research design and methods: We systematically identified care partners of persons living with dementia ≥65 years of age via structured EHR data in a large health care system. Eligible care partners were contacted by patient portal (if they were an established proxy), mail, and phone to complete a survey.

Results: Of 4,138 eligible persons living with dementia identified, 1,084 (26%) had a care partner name recorded in the EHR. Out of 259 (6%) with sufficient care partner contact information for outreach, 74 (29%) completed the survey. Among care partners, 62 (84%) reported being confident in managing dementia medications, 59 (80%) were willing to stop ≥1 medications, and 43 (58%) were very/extremely interested in using digital tools for decision-making.

Discussion and implications: Despite the low percentage of care partners with sufficient contact information, reach rates were high for contacted care partners, suggesting feasibility for pragmatic system-level interventions. Most care partners showed great interest in using digital health tools for decision-making and managing medications. Therefore, electronic tools could help with identifying care partners and engaging them. However, scaling up interventions requires better care partner documentation or extracting information from free text.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让痴呆症患者的护理伙伴参与电子外展处方的可行性和可接受性。
背景和目的:护理伙伴对痴呆症患者的治疗决策至关重要。然而,识别它们具有挑战性,阻碍了更广泛地使用干预措施,例如使用数字技术的干预措施。我们的目的是(i)评估使用电子健康记录(EHR)系统识别和联系护理伙伴的可行性,以及(ii)征求他们对电子干预处方的看法。研究设计和方法:我们通过大型医疗保健系统中的结构化电子病历数据系统地确定≥65岁痴呆患者的护理伙伴。通过患者门户网站(如果他们是已建立的代理)、邮件和电话联系符合条件的护理合作伙伴以完成调查。结果:在4138名符合条件的痴呆症患者中,1084名(26%)在电子病历中记录了护理伴侣的名字。在259名(6%)有足够的护理伙伴联系信息进行外展的患者中,74名(29%)完成了调查。在护理伙伴中,62人(84%)报告对管理痴呆症药物有信心,59人(80%)愿意停止≥1种药物,43人(58%)对使用数字工具进行决策非常/非常感兴趣。讨论和启示:尽管具有足够联系信息的护理伙伴比例较低,但接触护理伙伴的通达率很高,这表明实用的系统级干预措施是可行的。大多数护理伙伴对使用数字健康工具进行决策和管理药物表现出极大的兴趣。因此,电子工具可以帮助识别护理伙伴并让他们参与进来。然而,扩大干预措施需要更好的护理伙伴文件或从免费文本中提取信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Hebrew version of the Financial Exploitation Vulnerability Scale. Improving Care for Older Adults with Multiple Needs: The Value of Complexity Science. Sociodemographic Disparities in the Health Status of Informal Caregivers. Prevalence of sexual and gender minority affirmative policies in long-term care facilities in Minnesota. Discrimination, positive reappraisal, and hypertension among older Black adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1