Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility of a Mobile App-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Caregiver Stress.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf047
Evan Plys, Morgan Seward, Elizabeth M Allen, Raquel G Tatar, Jennifer Huberty, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
{"title":"Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility of a Mobile App-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Caregiver Stress.","authors":"Evan Plys, Morgan Seward, Elizabeth M Allen, Raquel G Tatar, Jennifer Huberty, Ana-Maria Vranceanu","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We tested feasibility and preliminary benefits of a free mobile app-delivered mindfulness-based intervention for stress among dementia caregivers (i.e., Healthy Minds Program for Caregivers [HMP-C]).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Single-blind Stage 1b pilot randomized controlled trial compared 12 weeks of HMP-C (n = 47) with a dose-matched education podcast control (n = 48; Wellness App [WA]). T-tests examined between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility benchmarks were met for acceptability (90% eligible enrolled), demand (95% completed post-tests), and data collection (100% measures complete). Treatment satisfaction was sufficient for HMP-C. Adherence was slightly lower than benchmarks (>52.5 minutes weekly) for HMP-C (67%) and WA (66%). Mechanistic targets of mindfulness (p < .001; d = -1.21) and positive aspects of caregiving (p < .001; d = -0.92) showed large pre-post improvements in the HMP-C group. Mechanistic validity was established through significant correlations between change in stress and change in mindfulness (r = -0.40, p = .006) and positive aspects of caregiving (r = -.49, p = .001). Pre-post improvements in HMP-C were not statistically significantly compared with WA for stress (p = .097; d = -0.35), depression (p = .110; d = -0.34), or anxiety (p = .237; d = -0.25).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The current study demonstrated feasibility and mechanistic target engagement and validity for HMP-C. As expected in an underpowered feasibility trial, clinical outcomes did not improve more than control, but trends favored HMP-C. Together, findings demonstrate that a fully powered Stage 2 trial is warranted to test the efficacy of HMP-C compared with WA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: We tested feasibility and preliminary benefits of a free mobile app-delivered mindfulness-based intervention for stress among dementia caregivers (i.e., Healthy Minds Program for Caregivers [HMP-C]).

Research design and methods: Single-blind Stage 1b pilot randomized controlled trial compared 12 weeks of HMP-C (n = 47) with a dose-matched education podcast control (n = 48; Wellness App [WA]). T-tests examined between-group differences.

Results: Feasibility benchmarks were met for acceptability (90% eligible enrolled), demand (95% completed post-tests), and data collection (100% measures complete). Treatment satisfaction was sufficient for HMP-C. Adherence was slightly lower than benchmarks (>52.5 minutes weekly) for HMP-C (67%) and WA (66%). Mechanistic targets of mindfulness (p < .001; d = -1.21) and positive aspects of caregiving (p < .001; d = -0.92) showed large pre-post improvements in the HMP-C group. Mechanistic validity was established through significant correlations between change in stress and change in mindfulness (r = -0.40, p = .006) and positive aspects of caregiving (r = -.49, p = .001). Pre-post improvements in HMP-C were not statistically significantly compared with WA for stress (p = .097; d = -0.35), depression (p = .110; d = -0.34), or anxiety (p = .237; d = -0.25).

Discussion and implications: The current study demonstrated feasibility and mechanistic target engagement and validity for HMP-C. As expected in an underpowered feasibility trial, clinical outcomes did not improve more than control, but trends favored HMP-C. Together, findings demonstrate that a fully powered Stage 2 trial is warranted to test the efficacy of HMP-C compared with WA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于正念的移动应用程序干预照顾者压力的可行性的随机对照试验。
背景和目的:我们测试了一种免费的移动应用程序提供的基于正念的干预痴呆症护理人员压力的可行性和初步效益(即护理人员健康心理计划[HMP-C])。研究设计和方法:单盲1b期先导随机对照试验将12周HMP-C (n = 47)与剂量匹配的教育播客对照(n = 48;健康App [WA])。t检验检验组间差异。结果:可接受性(90%合格入组)、需求(95%完成后测试)和数据收集(100%完成测量)均达到可行性基准。HMP-C治疗满意。HMP-C(57%)和WA(59%)的依从性低于基准(每周52.5分钟)。正念的机制目标(p < 0.001;D = -1.21)和积极方面的护理(p < 0.001;d = -0.92)显示HMP-C组有较大的前后改善。通过压力变化与正念变化之间的显著相关(r =-),建立了机制效度。40, p =.006)和照顾的积极方面(r =-。49, p =.001)。与WA相比,应激前后HMP-C的改善无统计学意义(p = 0.097;D = -0.35),抑郁(p = 0.110;D = -0.34)或焦虑(p = 0.237;D = -0.25)。讨论与启示:目前的研究证明了HMP-C的可行性和机制目标参与和有效性。正如在一项动力不足的可行性试验中所预期的那样,临床结果的改善并不比对照组多,但趋势倾向于HMP-C。总之,研究结果表明,有必要进行全面的2期试验,以测试HMP-C与WA的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Book review: Living Beyond Loss by Robert Neimeyer. Exploring the Cognitive Aspects of Walking in the Neighbourhoods among People Living with Dementia. Exploring Older Adults' Engagement with Socially-Assistive-Robots using AI: Personas, Patterns, and Psychosocial Outcomes. Navigating Late-Life Parental Care Transitions: Implications for Adult Children's Psychosocial Well-Being. Sentimental Value and the value of sentiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1