The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.

Amy L Sweeny, Emma Hall, Anthony Padowitz, Ben Walters, Ping Zhang, Kylie Alcorn, Gerben Keijzers, Andrea P Marshall, Jamie Ranse, Julia Crilly
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Amy L Sweeny, Emma Hall, Anthony Padowitz, Ben Walters, Ping Zhang, Kylie Alcorn, Gerben Keijzers, Andrea P Marshall, Jamie Ranse, Julia Crilly","doi":"10.1071/AH24182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCOVID-19 affected health care globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on both public and private emergency departments (EDs).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of ED presentations made to three private and two public hospital EDs located in one region in Queensland. Presentation rates per 1000 population and incident rate ratios (IRR) for three time periods: T1: pre-pandemic (March-June 2018/2019), T2: initial restrictions (March-June 2020), and T3: restrictions easing (March-June 2021) were calculated. Linear trends were produced to describe pre- and post-pandemic changes. Additional outcomes reported for public EDs included ED length of stay (LoS) and cost.ResultsIn T2, both public and private ED presentation rates decreased by 12% (overall IRR 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.89). Private EDs experienced a quicker and greater return of patient volumes in T3, exceeding T1 levels. The median ED length of stay decreased and then increased above pre-pandemic levels (T1: 159 min, T2: 151 min, T3: 201 min). Total costs were higher during T2 but then decreased during T3, below that of T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566). Between February 2020 and June 2021, 269 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 19 of whom (7.1%) interfaced with the ED.ConclusionsDuring initial COVID-19 restrictions, a shift towards fewer ED presentations was observed. Private ED presentations rebounded more quickly than public. Few COVID-19 patients interfaced with an ED. Systems and public-private agreements made during this time appeared to protect EDs and soften the impact of reduced volumes for the private sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveCOVID-19 affected health care globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on both public and private emergency departments (EDs).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of ED presentations made to three private and two public hospital EDs located in one region in Queensland. Presentation rates per 1000 population and incident rate ratios (IRR) for three time periods: T1: pre-pandemic (March-June 2018/2019), T2: initial restrictions (March-June 2020), and T3: restrictions easing (March-June 2021) were calculated. Linear trends were produced to describe pre- and post-pandemic changes. Additional outcomes reported for public EDs included ED length of stay (LoS) and cost.ResultsIn T2, both public and private ED presentation rates decreased by 12% (overall IRR 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.89). Private EDs experienced a quicker and greater return of patient volumes in T3, exceeding T1 levels. The median ED length of stay decreased and then increased above pre-pandemic levels (T1: 159 min, T2: 151 min, T3: 201 min). Total costs were higher during T2 but then decreased during T3, below that of T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566). Between February 2020 and June 2021, 269 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 19 of whom (7.1%) interfaced with the ED.ConclusionsDuring initial COVID-19 restrictions, a shift towards fewer ED presentations was observed. Private ED presentations rebounded more quickly than public. Few COVID-19 patients interfaced with an ED. Systems and public-private agreements made during this time appeared to protect EDs and soften the impact of reduced volumes for the private sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lived Experience Advisor Program initiative: harnessing consumer leadership for best care. An illustrative guide to a Policy Lab model: contributing to evidence-informed policies for digital technology in youth mental health care. Factors influencing participation in clinical supervision: a qualitative study reflecting physiotherapist and manager perspectives. The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia. Translational research in Australian mental health policy: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1