Biomechanical comparison of locking femoral neck plate versus cannulated screws with or without a medial buttress plate in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.

Yilmaz Onder, Tugrul Bulut, Osman Nuri Eroglu, Samet Ciklacandir, Yalcin Isler
{"title":"Biomechanical comparison of locking femoral neck plate versus cannulated screws with or without a medial buttress plate in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Yilmaz Onder, Tugrul Bulut, Osman Nuri Eroglu, Samet Ciklacandir, Yalcin Isler","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.24076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the locking femoral neck plate (LFNP) can be an alternative fixation method to the cannulated screws with a medial buttress plate. For this purpose, we compared biomechanically the LFNP and cannulated screws with or without a medial buttress plate in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A vertical fracture model was created at an 80-degree angle to the femoral neck in 28 synthetic bone models. The models were randomly divided into 4 groups, each containing 7 bones each. The bone fracture models were fixed with 3 parallel cannulated screws in group 1, 3 parallel cannulated screws combined with a medial buttress plate in group 2, LFNP in group 3, LFNP combined with a medial buttress plate in group 4. The stability of the specimens was tested biomechanically at a 7° valgus inclination to simulate normal 2-legged weight-bearing through an anatomical femur. The forces corresponding to 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm displacement and failure loads were calculated in all groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The axial load values corresponding to 4 di!erent fracture displacements and the failure load values of the groups were compared, group 1 was significantly weaker (P < .05 for each) while group 4 was significantly stronger (P < .05 for each) compared to the other groups. There was no statistically significant di!erence between group 2 and group 3 (P > .05 for each).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this biomechanical study showed that the LFNP fixation system provided su\"cient biomechanical stability for unstable Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures. The biomechanical performance of LFNP was similar to that of cannulated screws with medial buttress plate and better than that of cannulated screws alone. This suggests that LFNP can be a promising stable alternative fixation method to cannulated screws with a medial buttress plate in unstable femoral neck fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"58 6","pages":"313-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.24076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the locking femoral neck plate (LFNP) can be an alternative fixation method to the cannulated screws with a medial buttress plate. For this purpose, we compared biomechanically the LFNP and cannulated screws with or without a medial buttress plate in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.

Methods: A vertical fracture model was created at an 80-degree angle to the femoral neck in 28 synthetic bone models. The models were randomly divided into 4 groups, each containing 7 bones each. The bone fracture models were fixed with 3 parallel cannulated screws in group 1, 3 parallel cannulated screws combined with a medial buttress plate in group 2, LFNP in group 3, LFNP combined with a medial buttress plate in group 4. The stability of the specimens was tested biomechanically at a 7° valgus inclination to simulate normal 2-legged weight-bearing through an anatomical femur. The forces corresponding to 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm displacement and failure loads were calculated in all groups.

Results: The axial load values corresponding to 4 di!erent fracture displacements and the failure load values of the groups were compared, group 1 was significantly weaker (P < .05 for each) while group 4 was significantly stronger (P < .05 for each) compared to the other groups. There was no statistically significant di!erence between group 2 and group 3 (P > .05 for each).

Conclusion: The results of this biomechanical study showed that the LFNP fixation system provided su"cient biomechanical stability for unstable Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures. The biomechanical performance of LFNP was similar to that of cannulated screws with medial buttress plate and better than that of cannulated screws alone. This suggests that LFNP can be a promising stable alternative fixation method to cannulated screws with a medial buttress plate in unstable femoral neck fractures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical comparison of locking femoral neck plate versus cannulated screws with or without a medial buttress plate in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in improving visual clarity and operative time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Erratum. From the Editor. The effect of arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage procedure on joint range of motion and functional outcomes in anterior shoulder instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1