Unlocking Synergies: Sufficiency Economy Philosophy for Sustainability

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1002/bse.4151
Sirimon Treepongkaruna, Pattarake Sarajoti, Veerawin Korphaibool
{"title":"Unlocking Synergies: Sufficiency Economy Philosophy for Sustainability","authors":"Sirimon Treepongkaruna,&nbsp;Pattarake Sarajoti,&nbsp;Veerawin Korphaibool","doi":"10.1002/bse.4151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The 2030 Agenda, represented by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), signifies a global commitment to peace, prosperity, and sustainability. However, the lack of a unified strategy has slowed progress, raising concerns about meeting the 2030 deadline. Thailand's progress toward the SDGs has been influenced by various factors, including the role of the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SEP). This study uses corporate-level data and Refinitiv ESG ratings as proxies for sustainability performance to assess the impact of SEP score, as a proxy for SEP disclosure, on corporate sustainability. We find that Thai firms with higher SEP scores tend to exhibit better sustainability performance, especially in the environmental and governance dimensions. Our analyses reveal a causal relationship between SEP scores and corporate sustainability performance, with a one standard deviation increase in the SEP score leading to a 35% increase in sustainability performance. The findings support our hypothesis that SEP fosters stakeholder engagement and long-term value creation while aligning corporate strategies with sustainability goals, thereby contributing to the SDGs. Furthermore, the SEP score serves as a nonfinancial indicator that signals a firm's commitment to sustainability strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"34 3","pages":"3446-3468"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.4151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda, represented by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), signifies a global commitment to peace, prosperity, and sustainability. However, the lack of a unified strategy has slowed progress, raising concerns about meeting the 2030 deadline. Thailand's progress toward the SDGs has been influenced by various factors, including the role of the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SEP). This study uses corporate-level data and Refinitiv ESG ratings as proxies for sustainability performance to assess the impact of SEP score, as a proxy for SEP disclosure, on corporate sustainability. We find that Thai firms with higher SEP scores tend to exhibit better sustainability performance, especially in the environmental and governance dimensions. Our analyses reveal a causal relationship between SEP scores and corporate sustainability performance, with a one standard deviation increase in the SEP score leading to a 35% increase in sustainability performance. The findings support our hypothesis that SEP fosters stakeholder engagement and long-term value creation while aligning corporate strategies with sustainability goals, thereby contributing to the SDGs. Furthermore, the SEP score serves as a nonfinancial indicator that signals a firm's commitment to sustainability strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
释放协同效应:可持续发展的充足经济哲学
以可持续发展目标为代表的《2030年议程》标志着全球对和平、繁荣和可持续发展的承诺。然而,缺乏统一的战略减缓了进展,引发了人们对能否在2030年的最后期限前完成的担忧。泰国在实现可持续发展目标方面的进展受到各种因素的影响,包括自给自足经济哲学(SEP)的作用。本研究使用公司层面的数据和Refinitiv ESG评级作为可持续性绩效的代理,以评估SEP得分对公司可持续性的影响,作为SEP披露的代理。我们发现,SEP得分较高的泰国公司往往表现出更好的可持续性绩效,特别是在环境和治理方面。我们的分析揭示了SEP得分与企业可持续发展绩效之间的因果关系,SEP得分每增加一个标准差,可导致可持续发展绩效增加35%。研究结果支持了我们的假设,即SEP促进利益相关者参与和长期价值创造,同时使企业战略与可持续发展目标保持一致,从而为可持续发展目标做出贡献。此外,SEP得分作为一个非财务指标,表明公司对可持续发展战略的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Green Supply Chain Management Practice and Its Effect on Organizations' Economic Performance With the Mediating Role of Supply Chain Resilience (In the Case of Ethiopian Manufacturing Industry) Does Climate Risk Affect Employment Decisions? International Evidence Greening the Bottom Line: Public Funding for Circular Economy Initiatives and Financial Stability Consumer Resistance to Circular Fashion: A Systematic Literature Review of Consumer Barriers and Innovation Resistance in Circular Business Models Bridging Academic Research and Business Practices at the Crossroad of Circular Economy and the SDGs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1