Physicochemical properties of silicate tricalcium-based cement for use as pulp capping or repair material.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0136
Suyane Maria Luna-Cruz, Bernardo Almeida Aguiar, Pierre Basílio Almeida Fechine, Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Juliano Sartori Mendonça
{"title":"Physicochemical properties of silicate tricalcium-based cement for use as pulp capping or repair material.","authors":"Suyane Maria Luna-Cruz, Bernardo Almeida Aguiar, Pierre Basílio Almeida Fechine, Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Juliano Sartori Mendonça","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated some physicochemical properties of an experimental tricalcium silicate-based cement (ETSC) indicated for use as pulp capping or endodontic repair material; Biodentine (BD) and White MTA-Angelus (MTA) cements served as comparators. Setting time, radiopacity, sorption, and solubility were determined according to ISO 6876/2012 and compressive strength according to ISO 9917-1/2019. pH and calcium ion release capacity were also assessed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests with α = 0.05. BD (15') and ETSC (17.3') exhibited the shortest initial setting times, with BD (29') having the shortest final setting time; MTA showed longer times in both analyses (p < 0.05). ETSC and MTA showed the highest radiopacity (6.1 mm Al and 5.7 mm Al), while BD showed the lowest (3.0 mm Al) (p < 0.05). BD exhibited the highest compressive strength (88.8 MPa), significantly higher than the others (p < 0.05). BD presented the lowest values for sorption, 0.12% (24 h) and 0.48% (28 d), which differed significantly from MTA (p < 0.05). The lowest values for solubility were shown for ETSC, 0.26% (24 h), and BD, 0.52% (28 d), which differed significantly from MTA (p<0.05). ETSC showed the highest pH throughout all periods; significant differences were observed for MTA (3 h) and BD (24 h) (p<0.05). In the Ca2+ analysis, BD provided the highest values in all periods; differences were only significant compared to MTA (3h/24h) (p <0 .05). Considering the study conditions, it can be concluded that ETSC exhibited characteristics similar or better properties than the commercial cements tested, except for compressive strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"38 ","pages":"e136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated some physicochemical properties of an experimental tricalcium silicate-based cement (ETSC) indicated for use as pulp capping or endodontic repair material; Biodentine (BD) and White MTA-Angelus (MTA) cements served as comparators. Setting time, radiopacity, sorption, and solubility were determined according to ISO 6876/2012 and compressive strength according to ISO 9917-1/2019. pH and calcium ion release capacity were also assessed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests with α = 0.05. BD (15') and ETSC (17.3') exhibited the shortest initial setting times, with BD (29') having the shortest final setting time; MTA showed longer times in both analyses (p < 0.05). ETSC and MTA showed the highest radiopacity (6.1 mm Al and 5.7 mm Al), while BD showed the lowest (3.0 mm Al) (p < 0.05). BD exhibited the highest compressive strength (88.8 MPa), significantly higher than the others (p < 0.05). BD presented the lowest values for sorption, 0.12% (24 h) and 0.48% (28 d), which differed significantly from MTA (p < 0.05). The lowest values for solubility were shown for ETSC, 0.26% (24 h), and BD, 0.52% (28 d), which differed significantly from MTA (p<0.05). ETSC showed the highest pH throughout all periods; significant differences were observed for MTA (3 h) and BD (24 h) (p<0.05). In the Ca2+ analysis, BD provided the highest values in all periods; differences were only significant compared to MTA (3h/24h) (p <0 .05). Considering the study conditions, it can be concluded that ETSC exhibited characteristics similar or better properties than the commercial cements tested, except for compressive strength.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究评估了一种实验性硅酸三钙基水门汀(ETSC)的一些理化性质,该水门汀可用作牙髓盖髓或牙髓修复材料;生物丹汀(BD)和白色MTA-Angelus(MTA)水门汀可作为比较对象。根据 ISO 6876/2012 测定凝固时间、放射性、吸附性和溶解度,根据 ISO 9917-1/2019 测定抗压强度,并评估 pH 值和钙离子释放能力。数据分析采用方差分析和 Tukey 检验,或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Dunn 检验,α = 0.05。BD(15')和 ETSC(17.3')的初凝时间最短,BD(29')的终凝时间最短;MTA 在这两项分析中的时间都较长(p < 0.05)。ETSC 和 MTA 显示出最高的放射能(6.1 毫米铝和 5.7 毫米铝),而 BD 显示出最低的放射能(3.0 毫米铝)(p < 0.05)。BD 的抗压强度最高(88.8 兆帕),明显高于其他材料(p < 0.05)。BD 的吸附值最低,分别为 0.12% (24 小时) 和 0.48% (28 d),与 MTA 相比差异显著(p < 0.05)。ETSC 的溶解度值最低,为 0.26%(24 小时),BD 为 0.52%(28 天),与 MTA 相比差异显著(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of artifact suppression algorithm of post-processing CBCT software in root canal filling materials. Is sleep bruxism associated with smartphone use, neck pain, and sleep features among adolescents? Oral condition of patients hospitalized for Covid-19 and its impact on quality of life. A 4-year follow-up of the need for orthodontic treatment using the Dental Aesthetic Index-DAI: an exploratory analysis. Brazilian version of the OHIP 14 Periodontal Disease Questionnaire: cross cultural adaptation and validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1