R. Nucci, E. Serpelloni, L. Faenza, A. Garcia, M. E. Belardinelli
{"title":"Geodetic Strain Rates and Seismicity Rates Along the Apennines (Italy)","authors":"R. Nucci, E. Serpelloni, L. Faenza, A. Garcia, M. E. Belardinelli","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Apennines are a tectonically active belt that has experienced significant earthquakes (Mw<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>></mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${ >} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>6). The largest events primarily occurred along the chain axis, where a complex system of normal faults accommodates 2–3 mm/yr of SW-NE oriented extension, as precisely measured by a dense Global Navigation Satellite System network. Geodetic strain rates are now frequently used in earthquake hazard models; however, the impact of using such estimates, computed through different methods, for seismic hazard assessments may be difficult to evaluate. This study explores the relationship between geodetic strain rates and seismicity rates in the Apennines using three distinct horizontal strain rate maps and an instrumental seismicity catalog. We find that the principal directions of geodetic strain rate are kinematically consistent with those of strain release. We estimate a spatially heterogeneous seismogenic thickness using the distribution of earthquake depths, and we isolate likely independent seismicity using three different declustering methods. We observe a correlation between independent seismicity rates and the magnitude of strain rate, which can be represented by either a linear or, more accurately, by a power-law relationship. The variability in the strain-seismicity relationship depends on the combination of independent seismic catalogs and strain rate maps. This relationship is primarily influenced by the declustering technique more than the choice of the strain rate map and, in particular, by the number of aftershocks excluded during declustering. Seismicity models derived from these combinations were used to estimate and compare the seismic moment release rate with the tectonic moment rate estimated from strain rate maps and seismogenic thickness. Findings indicate that the tectonic moment rate exceeds the seismic moment release rate. We highlight uncertainties and potential causes, one of which could be a possible aseismic release of part of the moment rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029848","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Apennines are a tectonically active belt that has experienced significant earthquakes (Mw6). The largest events primarily occurred along the chain axis, where a complex system of normal faults accommodates 2–3 mm/yr of SW-NE oriented extension, as precisely measured by a dense Global Navigation Satellite System network. Geodetic strain rates are now frequently used in earthquake hazard models; however, the impact of using such estimates, computed through different methods, for seismic hazard assessments may be difficult to evaluate. This study explores the relationship between geodetic strain rates and seismicity rates in the Apennines using three distinct horizontal strain rate maps and an instrumental seismicity catalog. We find that the principal directions of geodetic strain rate are kinematically consistent with those of strain release. We estimate a spatially heterogeneous seismogenic thickness using the distribution of earthquake depths, and we isolate likely independent seismicity using three different declustering methods. We observe a correlation between independent seismicity rates and the magnitude of strain rate, which can be represented by either a linear or, more accurately, by a power-law relationship. The variability in the strain-seismicity relationship depends on the combination of independent seismic catalogs and strain rate maps. This relationship is primarily influenced by the declustering technique more than the choice of the strain rate map and, in particular, by the number of aftershocks excluded during declustering. Seismicity models derived from these combinations were used to estimate and compare the seismic moment release rate with the tectonic moment rate estimated from strain rate maps and seismogenic thickness. Findings indicate that the tectonic moment rate exceeds the seismic moment release rate. We highlight uncertainties and potential causes, one of which could be a possible aseismic release of part of the moment rate.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.