Improved Outcomes and Resource Use With Normothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation

IF 14.9 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY JAMA surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6520
Michelle C. Nguyen, Chi Zhang, Yu-Hui Chang, Xingjie Li, Stephanie Y. Ohara, Kayla R. Kumm, Christopher P. Cosentino, Bashar A. Aqel, Blanca C. Lizaola-Mayo, Peter E. Frasco, Raphael Nunez-Nateras, Winston R. Hewitt, Jack W. Harbell, Nitin N. Katariya, Andrew L. Singer, Adyr A. Moss, Kunam S. Reddy, Caroline Jadlowiec, Amit K. Mathur
{"title":"Improved Outcomes and Resource Use With Normothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation","authors":"Michelle C. Nguyen, Chi Zhang, Yu-Hui Chang, Xingjie Li, Stephanie Y. Ohara, Kayla R. Kumm, Christopher P. Cosentino, Bashar A. Aqel, Blanca C. Lizaola-Mayo, Peter E. Frasco, Raphael Nunez-Nateras, Winston R. Hewitt, Jack W. Harbell, Nitin N. Katariya, Andrew L. Singer, Adyr A. Moss, Kunam S. Reddy, Caroline Jadlowiec, Amit K. Mathur","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceNormothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been shown to reduce peritransplant complications. Despite increasing NMP use in liver transplant (LT), there is a scarcity of real-world clinical experience data.ObjectiveTo compare LT outcomes between donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts preserved with NMP or static cold storage (SCS).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included all consecutive adult LTs performed between January 2019 and December 2023 at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Data analysis was performed between February 2024 and June 2024. Outcomes of DBD-SCS, DBD-NMP, DCD-SCS, and DCD-NMP transplants were compared.ExposureDBD and DCD livers preserved on NMP or SCS.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were early allograft dysfunction (EAD), intraoperative transfusion, and post-LT hospital resource use, including length of stay (LOS) and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) and 1-year graft and patient survival.ResultsA total of 1086 LTs were included in the following 4 groups: DBD-SCS (n = 480), DBD-NMP (n = 63), DCD-SCS (n = 264), and DCD-NMP (n = 279). Among LT recipients, median (IQR) age was 60.0 years (52.0-66.0); 399 LT recipients (36.7%) were female. DCD-NMP had the lowest EAD rate (17.5%), followed by DCD-SCS (50.0%), DBD-NMP (36.8%), and DBD-SCS (27.3%) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). DCD-NMP had the lowest intraoperative transfusion requirement compared to all other groups. Hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS were shortest in DCD-NMP (median [IQR] hospital LOS, 5.0 days [4.0-7.0]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01; median [IQR] ICU LOS, 1.5 days [1.2-3.1]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01). One-year cumulative readmission probability was 86% lower for DCD-NMP vs DCD-SCS (95% CI, 0.09-0.22; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) and 53% lower for DBD-NMP vs DBD-SCS (95% CI, 0.26-0.87; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). AKI events were lower in DCD-NMP (31.1%) vs DCD-SCS (47.4%) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .001). Compared to SCS, the NMP group had a 78% overall reduction in graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.49; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). For those receiving DCD allografts, the risk reduction was even more pronounced, with an 87% decrease in graft failure (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). NMP was significantly protective from patient mortality vs SCS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this observational high-volume cohort study, NMP significantly improved LT clinical outcomes and reduced hospital resource use, especially in DCD allografts. NMP may enhance access to LT by addressing the challenges historically linked with DCD liver use.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6520","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceNormothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been shown to reduce peritransplant complications. Despite increasing NMP use in liver transplant (LT), there is a scarcity of real-world clinical experience data.ObjectiveTo compare LT outcomes between donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts preserved with NMP or static cold storage (SCS).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included all consecutive adult LTs performed between January 2019 and December 2023 at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Data analysis was performed between February 2024 and June 2024. Outcomes of DBD-SCS, DBD-NMP, DCD-SCS, and DCD-NMP transplants were compared.ExposureDBD and DCD livers preserved on NMP or SCS.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were early allograft dysfunction (EAD), intraoperative transfusion, and post-LT hospital resource use, including length of stay (LOS) and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) and 1-year graft and patient survival.ResultsA total of 1086 LTs were included in the following 4 groups: DBD-SCS (n = 480), DBD-NMP (n = 63), DCD-SCS (n = 264), and DCD-NMP (n = 279). Among LT recipients, median (IQR) age was 60.0 years (52.0-66.0); 399 LT recipients (36.7%) were female. DCD-NMP had the lowest EAD rate (17.5%), followed by DCD-SCS (50.0%), DBD-NMP (36.8%), and DBD-SCS (27.3%) (P &amp;lt; .001). DCD-NMP had the lowest intraoperative transfusion requirement compared to all other groups. Hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS were shortest in DCD-NMP (median [IQR] hospital LOS, 5.0 days [4.0-7.0]; P = .01; median [IQR] ICU LOS, 1.5 days [1.2-3.1]; P = .01). One-year cumulative readmission probability was 86% lower for DCD-NMP vs DCD-SCS (95% CI, 0.09-0.22; P &amp;lt; .001) and 53% lower for DBD-NMP vs DBD-SCS (95% CI, 0.26-0.87; P &amp;lt; .001). AKI events were lower in DCD-NMP (31.1%) vs DCD-SCS (47.4%) (P = .001). Compared to SCS, the NMP group had a 78% overall reduction in graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.49; P &amp;lt; .001). For those receiving DCD allografts, the risk reduction was even more pronounced, with an 87% decrease in graft failure (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33; P &amp;lt; .001). NMP was significantly protective from patient mortality vs SCS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; P = .02).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this observational high-volume cohort study, NMP significantly improved LT clinical outcomes and reduced hospital resource use, especially in DCD allografts. NMP may enhance access to LT by addressing the challenges historically linked with DCD liver use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常温机器灌注改善肝移植预后和资源利用
大量机器灌注(NMP)已被证明可以减少移植周围并发症。尽管NMP在肝移植(LT)中的应用越来越多,但缺乏真实世界的临床经验数据。目的比较NMP和静态冷库(SCS)保存的脑死亡后捐赠(DBD)和循环死亡后捐赠(DCD)同种异体移植的肝移植预后。设计、环境和参与者这项单中心、回顾性观察队列研究包括2019年1月至2023年12月在亚利桑那州梅奥诊所进行的所有连续成人LTs。数据分析时间为2024年2月至2024年6月。比较DBD-SCS、DBD-NMP、DCD-SCS和DCD-NMP移植的结果。暴露在NMP或SCS上保存的dbd和DCD肝脏。主要结局和措施主要结局是早期同种异体移植物功能障碍(EAD)、术中输血和肝移植后医院资源使用,包括住院时间(LOS)和再入院。次要结局包括急性肾损伤(AKI)、1年移植和患者生存。结果共纳入1086例LTs,分为4组:DBD-SCS组(n = 480)、DBD-NMP组(n = 63)、DCD-SCS组(n = 264)、DCD-NMP组(n = 279)。在肝移植受者中,中位(IQR)年龄为60.0岁(52.0-66.0岁);399例(36.7%)为女性。cd - nmp的EAD率最低(17.5%),其次是cd - scs(50.0%)、DBD-NMP(36.8%)和DBD-SCS (27.3%) (P &lt;措施)。与所有其他组相比,DCD-NMP组术中输血需求最低。在DCD-NMP中,医院和重症监护病房(ICU)的生存时间最短(中位数[IQR]医院生存时间为5.0天[4.0-7.0];P = 0.01;中位[IQR] ICU LOS, 1.5天[1.2-3.1];P = 0.01)。与DCD-SCS相比,DCD-NMP的1年累计再入院概率低86% (95% CI, 0.09-0.22;P, amp;肝移植;.001), DBD-NMP比DBD-SCS低53% (95% CI, 0.26-0.87;P, amp;肝移植;措施)。DCD-NMP组AKI事件发生率(31.1%)低于DCD-SCS组(47.4%)(P = 0.001)。与SCS相比,NMP组总的移植物衰竭减少了78%(风险比[HR], 0.22;95% ci, 0.10-0.49;P, amp;肝移植;措施)。对于接受DCD同种异体移植的患者,风险降低更为明显,移植失败降低87% (HR, 0.13;95% ci, 0.05-0.33;P, amp;肝移植;措施)。与SCS相比,NMP对患者死亡率有显著保护作用(HR, 0.31;95% ci, 0.12-0.80;P = .02)。结论和相关性在这项观察性大容量队列研究中,NMP显著改善了肝移植的临床结果,减少了医院资源的使用,特别是在DCD同种异体移植中。NMP可以通过解决历史上与DCD肝脏使用相关的挑战来增强肝移植的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Nationwide Implementation of Multimodal Prehabilitation and Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Functional Recovery After Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery. Enhancing Reality in the Multidisciplinary World. Activity and Physiological Stress Within 90 Days After Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Predefined Analysis of the DIPLOMA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. Enhancing Reality in the Multidisciplinary World-Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1