Preventing and Treating Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) after Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000006642
Roberto M Montorsi,Bo T M Strijbos,Martijn W J Stommel,Kees van Laarhoven,Freek Daams,Olivier R Busch,Pascal Probst,Umberto Cillo,Giovanni Marchegiani,Marc G Besselink
{"title":"Preventing and Treating Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) after Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Roberto M Montorsi,Bo T M Strijbos,Martijn W J Stommel,Kees van Laarhoven,Freek Daams,Olivier R Busch,Pascal Probst,Umberto Cillo,Giovanni Marchegiani,Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo identify strategies to prevent and treat delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery.\r\n\r\nBACKGROUND\r\nAmong all complications of pancreatic surgery, DGE has the largest impact on prolonged hospital stay. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have addressed DGE after pancreatic surgery, either as primary or as secondary outcome.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nRCTs involving pancreatic surgery with DGE as primary or secondary outcome were identified using the online database of the ISGPS Evidence Map of Pancreatic Surgery (2007-2023). Meta-analysis was performed for impact on DGE grade B/C for interventions studied by at least 2 RCTs.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOverall, 152 RCTs were included with 22,260 patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. The overall rate of DGE grade B/C was 11.9%, including 12.7% after pancreatoduodenectomy and 4.2% after left pancreatectomy. No RCT identified an effective treatment of DGE grade B/C. Strategies which reduced the rate of DGE in at least one RCT included: prehabilitation, pancreatico-jejunostomy, antecolic gastrojejunostomy, Billroth II technique, pylorus resection, modified Roux-en-Y technique, no intraperitoneal drainage in left pancreatectomy, minimally invasive left pancreatectomy, minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, mERAS, nasojejunal tube, and early oral feeding. Additional meta-analyses identified minimally-invasive left pancreatectomy as preventive for DGE grade B/C compared to open left pancreatectomy.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis systematic review of RCTs identified 12 strategies which reduced the rate of DGE grade B/C after pancreatic surgery but no effective treatment strategy. Of the 12 preventive strategies, only minimally-invasive left pancreatectomy was confirmed effective in a meta-analysis. Future RCTs should focus on both prevention and treatment of DGE after pancreatic surgery.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify strategies to prevent and treat delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery. BACKGROUND Among all complications of pancreatic surgery, DGE has the largest impact on prolonged hospital stay. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have addressed DGE after pancreatic surgery, either as primary or as secondary outcome. METHODS RCTs involving pancreatic surgery with DGE as primary or secondary outcome were identified using the online database of the ISGPS Evidence Map of Pancreatic Surgery (2007-2023). Meta-analysis was performed for impact on DGE grade B/C for interventions studied by at least 2 RCTs. RESULTS Overall, 152 RCTs were included with 22,260 patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. The overall rate of DGE grade B/C was 11.9%, including 12.7% after pancreatoduodenectomy and 4.2% after left pancreatectomy. No RCT identified an effective treatment of DGE grade B/C. Strategies which reduced the rate of DGE in at least one RCT included: prehabilitation, pancreatico-jejunostomy, antecolic gastrojejunostomy, Billroth II technique, pylorus resection, modified Roux-en-Y technique, no intraperitoneal drainage in left pancreatectomy, minimally invasive left pancreatectomy, minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, mERAS, nasojejunal tube, and early oral feeding. Additional meta-analyses identified minimally-invasive left pancreatectomy as preventive for DGE grade B/C compared to open left pancreatectomy. CONCLUSION This systematic review of RCTs identified 12 strategies which reduced the rate of DGE grade B/C after pancreatic surgery but no effective treatment strategy. Of the 12 preventive strategies, only minimally-invasive left pancreatectomy was confirmed effective in a meta-analysis. Future RCTs should focus on both prevention and treatment of DGE after pancreatic surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防和治疗胰腺手术后胃排空延迟(DGE):随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的探讨胰腺手术后胃排空延迟的防治策略。背景:在胰腺手术的所有并发症中,DGE对延长住院时间的影响最大。一些随机对照试验(rct)已经将胰腺手术后的DGE作为主要或次要结局进行了研究。方法使用ISGPS胰腺手术证据地图(2007-2023)在线数据库,对涉及胰腺手术的以DGE为主要或次要结局的随机对照试验进行筛选。对至少2项随机对照试验研究的干预措施对DGE B/C级的影响进行meta分析。结果共纳入152项随机对照试验,共纳入22260例接受胰腺手术的患者。DGE分级B/C的总发生率为11.9%,其中胰十二指肠切除术后12.7%,左胰切除术后4.2%。没有随机对照试验确定DGE B/C级的有效治疗方法。在至少一项RCT中,降低DGE发生率的策略包括:预康复、胰空肠吻合术、前结肠胃空肠吻合术、Billroth II技术、幽门切除术、改良Roux-en-Y技术、左胰切除术不腹腔内引流、微创左胰切除术、微创胰十二指肠切除术、mERAS、鼻空肠管和早期口服喂养。另外的荟萃分析发现,与开放式左胰切除术相比,微创左胰切除术可预防DGE B/C级。结论本系统回顾了12项随机对照试验,确定了降低胰腺手术后DGE B/C级发生率的策略,但没有有效的治疗策略。在12种预防策略中,只有微创左胰切除术在荟萃分析中被证实有效。未来的随机对照试验应关注胰腺手术后DGE的预防和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Recurrence and Survival After Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6 Randomized Controlled Trial. Validation and Optimization of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Risk Classification of High-risk Pancreas for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors. Efficacy of Self-Expandable Absorbable Stents During Liver Transplant to Minimize Early Biliary Complications. Propensity Score-matched Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minor Liver Resections of the Anterolateral Segments: An International Multicenter Study of 10,517 Cases. Prophylactic Mesh-related Reoperations and Mesh-related Problems During Subsequent Relaparotomies: Long-term Results From the PRIMA Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1