The Risk of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty Depends More on Stem Design Than Cement Use: An Analysis of National Health Data from England.

J N Lamb,R M West,S D Relton,J M Wilkinson,H G Pandit
{"title":"The Risk of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty Depends More on Stem Design Than Cement Use: An Analysis of National Health Data from England.","authors":"J N Lamb,R M West,S D Relton,J M Wilkinson,H G Pandit","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn this study, we estimated the risk of surgically treated postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) associated with femoral implants frequently used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, POPFFs were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national hospital records. POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders, were estimated for common stems. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients >70 years of age, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and with femoral neck fracture.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPOPFFs occurred in 0.6% (5,100) of 809,832 cases during a median follow-up of 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9 to 9.6 years). After cemented stem implantation, the majority of POPFFs were treated with fixation. Adjusted prosthesis time incidence rates (PTIRs) for POPFFs varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam (CB) stems demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF compared with the current gold standard of a polished taper slip cemented stem.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCemented CB stems were associated with the lowest POPFF risk, and some cementless stem designs outperformed modern cemented stem designs. Stem design was strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when considering femoral implants in those most at risk for POPFF.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In this study, we estimated the risk of surgically treated postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) associated with femoral implants frequently used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS In this cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, POPFFs were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national hospital records. POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders, were estimated for common stems. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients >70 years of age, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and with femoral neck fracture. RESULTS POPFFs occurred in 0.6% (5,100) of 809,832 cases during a median follow-up of 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9 to 9.6 years). After cemented stem implantation, the majority of POPFFs were treated with fixation. Adjusted prosthesis time incidence rates (PTIRs) for POPFFs varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam (CB) stems demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF compared with the current gold standard of a polished taper slip cemented stem. CONCLUSIONS Cemented CB stems were associated with the lowest POPFF risk, and some cementless stem designs outperformed modern cemented stem designs. Stem design was strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when considering femoral implants in those most at risk for POPFF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的风险更多地取决于椎体设计而不是水泥的使用:一项来自英国的国家健康数据分析
背景:在本研究中,我们评估了手术治疗后股骨假体周围骨折(POPFFs)与全髋关节置换术(THA)中常用的股骨假体相关的风险。方法在这项队列研究中,研究对象是2004年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在英国接受原发性THA手术的患者,从前瞻性收集的修订记录和国家医院记录中确定popff。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,对普通茎的POPFF发病率进行了估计。亚组分析的对象是年龄在bb0 ~ 70岁、无骨关节炎指征和股骨颈骨折的患者。结果在中位随访6.5年(四分位数间距[IQR], 3.9 ~ 9.6年)期间,809832例患者中有0.6%(5100例)发生spopff。骨水泥柄植入后,大多数popff均采用固定治疗。popff的调整假体时间发生率(PTIRs)因假体设计而异,与骨水泥固定无关。胶结复合梁(CB)系统显示出最低的POPFF风险。与目前抛光锥滑固井管柱的黄金标准相比,有环箍的无水泥管柱具有相同或更低的POPFF率。结论:骨水泥CB柱具有最低的POPFF风险,一些无骨水泥柱设计优于现代骨水泥柱设计。无论水泥是否存在,阀杆设计与POPFF风险密切相关。外科医生、决策者和患者在考虑对POPFF风险最高的患者进行股骨植入时应考虑这些结果。证据水平:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orthopaedic Research in Singapore: The Past, Present, and Future. Evaluating the Wear of a Viscoelastic Spinal Disc in the Context of Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Commentary on an article by Kingsley R. Chin, MD, et al.: "Comparative in Vitro Analysis of Wear Particles Generated by a Viscoelastic Disc Versus 2 Articulating Total Disc Replacements". Better Balance for Patients with Lumbar AIS: Commentary on an article by Mun Keong Kwan, MBBS, MSOrth, et al.: "Prevention of Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with a Major Lumbar Curve. The Intraoperative Crossbar Coronal-Balancing Technique". Recurrently Back to the Drawing Board on Thromboprophylaxis After Spine Surgery: Commentary on an article by Ahmad Essa, MD, MPH, et al.: "Trends and Impact of Pharmacological VTE Prophylaxis Timing for Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Across North American Trauma Centers". The Application of Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1