Involuntary autobiographical memories as a transdiagnostic factor in mental disorders

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102545
Yanyan Shan , David C. Rubin , Dorthe Berntsen
{"title":"Involuntary autobiographical memories as a transdiagnostic factor in mental disorders","authors":"Yanyan Shan ,&nbsp;David C. Rubin ,&nbsp;Dorthe Berntsen","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Involuntary autobiographical memories are memories of personal events that come to mind with no preceding retrieval attempts. They have been studied broadly in autobiographical memory for decades and shown to be common and mostly positive in everyday life. Clinical literature has focused on negative intrusive memories of stressful events and tended to neglect other forms of involuntary autobiographical memories. However, recently, there has been an upsurge of research addressing involuntary memories more broadly in clinical disorders, including both stressful and mundane memories, and both real life events and simulated events. We here provide the first integrated and comprehensive review of all studied types of involuntary memories in clinical and subclinical populations. We review their frequencies and characteristics across a broad selection of memory properties. A systematic search of the PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science databases yielded 79 empirical studies, with the majority focusing on depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychosis, and a few addressing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, health anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and social anxiety.</div><div>Findings show that an increased frequency of involuntary memories–in all forms–is found across disorders, possibly reflecting executive deficits. Additionally, heightened negativity, greater emotional impact, and the use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in response to these memories are typically reported among individuals with PTSD and depression, but less consistently for psychotic disorders. Overall, the findings identify involuntary memories with distinct characteristics as a transdiagnostic phenomenon, suggesting a deeper understanding of mental health problems and more targeted treatment approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102545"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027273582500011X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Involuntary autobiographical memories are memories of personal events that come to mind with no preceding retrieval attempts. They have been studied broadly in autobiographical memory for decades and shown to be common and mostly positive in everyday life. Clinical literature has focused on negative intrusive memories of stressful events and tended to neglect other forms of involuntary autobiographical memories. However, recently, there has been an upsurge of research addressing involuntary memories more broadly in clinical disorders, including both stressful and mundane memories, and both real life events and simulated events. We here provide the first integrated and comprehensive review of all studied types of involuntary memories in clinical and subclinical populations. We review their frequencies and characteristics across a broad selection of memory properties. A systematic search of the PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science databases yielded 79 empirical studies, with the majority focusing on depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychosis, and a few addressing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, health anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and social anxiety.
Findings show that an increased frequency of involuntary memories–in all forms–is found across disorders, possibly reflecting executive deficits. Additionally, heightened negativity, greater emotional impact, and the use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in response to these memories are typically reported among individuals with PTSD and depression, but less consistently for psychotic disorders. Overall, the findings identify involuntary memories with distinct characteristics as a transdiagnostic phenomenon, suggesting a deeper understanding of mental health problems and more targeted treatment approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024) Five-factor personality traits and functional somatic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis What is fidelity? A systematic review of provider fidelity and its associations with engagement and outcomes in parenting programs Prevalence of mental health conditions, substance use disorders, suicidal ideation and attempts, and experiences of homelessness among Veterans with criminal-legal involvement: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1