Markers for Pressure Injury Risk in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000253
Yi-Ting Tzen, Wei-Han Tan, Patricia T Champagne, Jijia Wang, Merrine Klakeel, Wei-Han Tan, Kath M Bogie, Timothy J Koh
{"title":"Markers for Pressure Injury Risk in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Yi-Ting Tzen, Wei-Han Tan, Patricia T Champagne, Jijia Wang, Merrine Klakeel, Wei-Han Tan, Kath M Bogie, Timothy J Koh","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify markers associated with pressure injury (PrI) history in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) using two approaches: skin blood flow (SBF) response toward localized heating, and serum marker for insulin resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this cross-sectional, observational study of adults with chronic traumatic SCI at T12 and above, researchers recruited two groups of participants: with history of PrI (group 1), and without history of PrI (group 2). The study protocol included obtaining fasting blood samples and measurement of SBF at bilateral heels with localized heating of 42 °C for 30 minutes from all participants. Primary SBF outcomes were initial peak and plateau SBF normalized to baseline SBF. The primary outcome for insulin resistance was Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), calculated from fasting plasma glucose and insulin. Secondary outcomes included demographic and SCI information. Researchers used the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test to compare the intergroup difference of categorical and continuous variables, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen adults completed this study (group 1, n = 7; group 2, n = 9). In comparison with group 2, group 1 had significantly higher HOMA-IR (3.90 ± 0.71 vs 1.45 ± 0.71), suggesting higher insulin resistance, and longer duration of injury (22.54 ± 7.24 vs 7.98 ± 6.58 years). There were no between-group differences in SBF or other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HOMA-IR is a novel serum index associated with PrI history in persons with chronic SCI. Future longitudinal study is warranted to examine the role of insulin resistance in increasing PrI risk for the SCI population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify markers associated with pressure injury (PrI) history in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) using two approaches: skin blood flow (SBF) response toward localized heating, and serum marker for insulin resistance.

Methods: For this cross-sectional, observational study of adults with chronic traumatic SCI at T12 and above, researchers recruited two groups of participants: with history of PrI (group 1), and without history of PrI (group 2). The study protocol included obtaining fasting blood samples and measurement of SBF at bilateral heels with localized heating of 42 °C for 30 minutes from all participants. Primary SBF outcomes were initial peak and plateau SBF normalized to baseline SBF. The primary outcome for insulin resistance was Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), calculated from fasting plasma glucose and insulin. Secondary outcomes included demographic and SCI information. Researchers used the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test to compare the intergroup difference of categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results: Sixteen adults completed this study (group 1, n = 7; group 2, n = 9). In comparison with group 2, group 1 had significantly higher HOMA-IR (3.90 ± 0.71 vs 1.45 ± 0.71), suggesting higher insulin resistance, and longer duration of injury (22.54 ± 7.24 vs 7.98 ± 6.58 years). There were no between-group differences in SBF or other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: HOMA-IR is a novel serum index associated with PrI history in persons with chronic SCI. Future longitudinal study is warranted to examine the role of insulin resistance in increasing PrI risk for the SCI population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Oncology/Hematology Nurses' Proficiency in Assessing Lower-Extremity Skin and Edema in Patients with Cancer: An Observational Study. Impact of Cleaning and Disinfecting on Full-Body Support Surfaces. Markers for Pressure Injury Risk in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study. Pyoderma Gangrenosum Improved with Dapsone and Prednisone: A Case Report. Risk Prediction Model of Peristomal Skin Complications Among Patients with Colorectal Cancer and an Ostomy: A Cross-sectional Study in Shanghai, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1