Karen Caeyenberghs, Mervyn Singh, Annalee L Cobden, Elizabeth G Ellis, Liam G Graeme, Priscilla Gates, Alex Burmester, Jade Guarnera, Jake Burnett, Evelyn M Deutscher, Lyndon Firman-Sadler, Bec Joyce, Jacqueline P Notarianni, Christian Pardo de Figueroa Flores, Juan F Domínguez D
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury: a survey of clinical practitioners' experiences and views on current practice and obstacles.","authors":"Karen Caeyenberghs, Mervyn Singh, Annalee L Cobden, Elizabeth G Ellis, Liam G Graeme, Priscilla Gates, Alex Burmester, Jade Guarnera, Jake Burnett, Evelyn M Deutscher, Lyndon Firman-Sadler, Bec Joyce, Jacqueline P Notarianni, Christian Pardo de Figueroa Flores, Juan F Domínguez D","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 respondents, 73.4% reported that they acquire/order MRI scans in TBI patients, and 66% indicated they would prefer MRI be more often used with this cohort. The greatest impediment for MRI usage was scanner availability (57.1%). Less than half of respondents (42.1%) indicated that they perform advanced MRI analysis. Factors such as dedicated experts within the team (44.4%) and user-friendly MRI analysis tools (40.7%), were listed as potentially helpful to implement advanced MRI analyses in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest a wide variability in the purpose, timing, and composition of the scanning protocol of clinical MRI after TBI. Three recommendations are described to broaden implementation of MRI in clinical practice in TBI: 1) development of a standardized multimodal MRI protocol; 2) future directions for the use of advanced MRI analyses; 3) use of low-field MRI to overcome technical/practical issues with high-field MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.
Methods: A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.
Results: Of the 81 respondents, 73.4% reported that they acquire/order MRI scans in TBI patients, and 66% indicated they would prefer MRI be more often used with this cohort. The greatest impediment for MRI usage was scanner availability (57.1%). Less than half of respondents (42.1%) indicated that they perform advanced MRI analysis. Factors such as dedicated experts within the team (44.4%) and user-friendly MRI analysis tools (40.7%), were listed as potentially helpful to implement advanced MRI analyses in clinical practice.
Conclusion: Results suggest a wide variability in the purpose, timing, and composition of the scanning protocol of clinical MRI after TBI. Three recommendations are described to broaden implementation of MRI in clinical practice in TBI: 1) development of a standardized multimodal MRI protocol; 2) future directions for the use of advanced MRI analyses; 3) use of low-field MRI to overcome technical/practical issues with high-field MRI.
期刊介绍:
Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.