Interventions to reduce non-prescription antimicrobial sales in community pharmacies.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD013722.pub2
Moe Moe Thandar, Toshiaki Baba, Sadatoshi Matsuoka, Erika Ota
{"title":"Interventions to reduce non-prescription antimicrobial sales in community pharmacies.","authors":"Moe Moe Thandar, Toshiaki Baba, Sadatoshi Matsuoka, Erika Ota","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013722.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health concern. One of the most important causes of AMR is the excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobial drugs in healthcare and community settings. Most countries have policies that require antimicrobial drugs to be obtained from a pharmacy by prescription. The term 'non-prescription antimicrobial sale' refers to the dispensing and selling of antimicrobial drugs without a prescription in countries where the pharmaceutical policy does not permit the sale of antimicrobial drugs without a prescription. Pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets are major sources of non-prescription antimicrobial sales in the community setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of interventions for reducing non-prescription antimicrobial sales by pharmacists and non-pharmacists in community pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets. To assess whether the effects of interventions differ according to types of interventions (single or multicomponent), community pharmacy personnel (pharmacists or non-pharmacists), and countries (low to lower-middle-income and upper-middle to high income).</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched five databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase, and two trial registers to 26 September 2022. We also conducted reference checking and citation searches.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomized trials, cluster-randomized trials, and quasi-randomized trials evaluating interventions targeted at pharmacists and non-pharmacists in community pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets. Our primary outcomes were non-prescription antimicrobial sales, symptomatic or asymptomatic infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant pathogens among pharmacy clients or community residents, and adverse events associated with non-prescription antimicrobial drug use in pharmacy clients. Our secondary outcomes were history taking and provision of advice to pharmacy clients, and knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We followed standard Cochrane methods.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included four trials conducted in pharmacies and drugstores. Three studies were published between 2000 and 2010, and the fourth in 2016. In total, 942 community pharmacies and drugstores participated, including both pharmacists and non-pharmacists. One study conducted in Scotland was a four-arm trial that included educational outreach visits, continuing professional education, and a combination of both as interventions, in comparison to a control group supplied with guideline materials only. Two studies conducted in Portugal and Uganda compared the combination of training and distribution of written materials with a control of no intervention. One study conducted in Thailand and Vietnam compared a sequence of three interventions (regulatory enforcement, education, and peer-monitoring) with a control of no intervention. Only non-prescription antimicrobial sales, history taking and provision of advice to pharmacy clients, and knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists were assessed in the included studies; no study assessed other outcomes. We judged the overall risk of bias for non-prescription antimicrobial sales to be high risk and for the other two outcomes to be some concerns. One study conducted in Scotland assessed single-component interventions (in two intervention arms) versus a control of written guidelines, and reported one primary outcome and one secondary outcome. Non-prescription antimicrobial sales: the study reported the sale or non-sale of antifungal drugs according to simulated patient scenarios. It did not report any differences between the intervention and control groups for the scenarios in which antifungal drugs should not have been sold without a prescription. The certainty of evidence for this outcome was very low. Knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists: the study reported knowledge scores at baseline and follow-up, but did not compare the scores between two single-component intervention arms and the control arm at both time points. Four studies assessed multicomponent interventions versus a control of written guidelines or no intervention, and reported one primary outcome and two secondary outcomes. Non-prescription antimicrobial sales:two studies conducted in Uganda, Thailand, and Vietnam involving 337 randomized community pharmacies and drugstores reported the proportion of non-prescription antimicrobial sales to the total number of requests using a simulated client method. Based on vote counting, both studies favored the intervention, that is multicomponent interventions reduced the sales of non-prescription antimicrobial drugs by pharmacists and non-pharmacists. The information in the other two studies was inadequate to address this primary outcome. One study in Portugal reported that total antibiotic consumption at the municipal level (comprising both prescribed and non-prescribed antibiotic sales) was reduced after a multicomponent intervention. The study conducted in Scotland assessed a multicomponent intervention (in one intervention arm) and reported the sale or non-sale of antifungal drugs according to simulated patient scenarios. It did not report any differences between the intervention and control groups for the scenarios in which antifungal drugs should not have been sold without a prescription. The certainty of evidence for this outcome was very low. History taking and provision of advice to pharmacy clients:two studies conducted in Uganda, Thailand, and Vietnam reported this outcome. In Thailand and Vietnam, there was an improvement in the practices of pharmacists and non-pharmacists in the intervention groups, while Uganda reported a paradoxical decline. Knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists:the study conducted in Scotland reported knowledge scores at baseline and follow-up, but did not compare the scores between the multicomponent intervention arm and control arm at both time points.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>No firm conclusions can be drawn about the effects of single-component interventions due to limited evidence. Multicomponent interventions may not reduce the sales of non-prescription antimicrobial drugs in community pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets; however, the evidence is of very low certainty. Further studies on this topic are needed, particularly to assess the effects of important single interventions such as improving pharmaceutical policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"1 ","pages":"CD013722"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013722.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health concern. One of the most important causes of AMR is the excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobial drugs in healthcare and community settings. Most countries have policies that require antimicrobial drugs to be obtained from a pharmacy by prescription. The term 'non-prescription antimicrobial sale' refers to the dispensing and selling of antimicrobial drugs without a prescription in countries where the pharmaceutical policy does not permit the sale of antimicrobial drugs without a prescription. Pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets are major sources of non-prescription antimicrobial sales in the community setting.

Objectives: To assess the effects of interventions for reducing non-prescription antimicrobial sales by pharmacists and non-pharmacists in community pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets. To assess whether the effects of interventions differ according to types of interventions (single or multicomponent), community pharmacy personnel (pharmacists or non-pharmacists), and countries (low to lower-middle-income and upper-middle to high income).

Search methods: We searched five databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase, and two trial registers to 26 September 2022. We also conducted reference checking and citation searches.

Selection criteria: We included randomized trials, cluster-randomized trials, and quasi-randomized trials evaluating interventions targeted at pharmacists and non-pharmacists in community pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets. Our primary outcomes were non-prescription antimicrobial sales, symptomatic or asymptomatic infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant pathogens among pharmacy clients or community residents, and adverse events associated with non-prescription antimicrobial drug use in pharmacy clients. Our secondary outcomes were history taking and provision of advice to pharmacy clients, and knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists.

Data collection and analysis: We followed standard Cochrane methods.

Main results: We included four trials conducted in pharmacies and drugstores. Three studies were published between 2000 and 2010, and the fourth in 2016. In total, 942 community pharmacies and drugstores participated, including both pharmacists and non-pharmacists. One study conducted in Scotland was a four-arm trial that included educational outreach visits, continuing professional education, and a combination of both as interventions, in comparison to a control group supplied with guideline materials only. Two studies conducted in Portugal and Uganda compared the combination of training and distribution of written materials with a control of no intervention. One study conducted in Thailand and Vietnam compared a sequence of three interventions (regulatory enforcement, education, and peer-monitoring) with a control of no intervention. Only non-prescription antimicrobial sales, history taking and provision of advice to pharmacy clients, and knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists were assessed in the included studies; no study assessed other outcomes. We judged the overall risk of bias for non-prescription antimicrobial sales to be high risk and for the other two outcomes to be some concerns. One study conducted in Scotland assessed single-component interventions (in two intervention arms) versus a control of written guidelines, and reported one primary outcome and one secondary outcome. Non-prescription antimicrobial sales: the study reported the sale or non-sale of antifungal drugs according to simulated patient scenarios. It did not report any differences between the intervention and control groups for the scenarios in which antifungal drugs should not have been sold without a prescription. The certainty of evidence for this outcome was very low. Knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists: the study reported knowledge scores at baseline and follow-up, but did not compare the scores between two single-component intervention arms and the control arm at both time points. Four studies assessed multicomponent interventions versus a control of written guidelines or no intervention, and reported one primary outcome and two secondary outcomes. Non-prescription antimicrobial sales:two studies conducted in Uganda, Thailand, and Vietnam involving 337 randomized community pharmacies and drugstores reported the proportion of non-prescription antimicrobial sales to the total number of requests using a simulated client method. Based on vote counting, both studies favored the intervention, that is multicomponent interventions reduced the sales of non-prescription antimicrobial drugs by pharmacists and non-pharmacists. The information in the other two studies was inadequate to address this primary outcome. One study in Portugal reported that total antibiotic consumption at the municipal level (comprising both prescribed and non-prescribed antibiotic sales) was reduced after a multicomponent intervention. The study conducted in Scotland assessed a multicomponent intervention (in one intervention arm) and reported the sale or non-sale of antifungal drugs according to simulated patient scenarios. It did not report any differences between the intervention and control groups for the scenarios in which antifungal drugs should not have been sold without a prescription. The certainty of evidence for this outcome was very low. History taking and provision of advice to pharmacy clients:two studies conducted in Uganda, Thailand, and Vietnam reported this outcome. In Thailand and Vietnam, there was an improvement in the practices of pharmacists and non-pharmacists in the intervention groups, while Uganda reported a paradoxical decline. Knowledge of pharmacists and non-pharmacists:the study conducted in Scotland reported knowledge scores at baseline and follow-up, but did not compare the scores between the multicomponent intervention arm and control arm at both time points.

Authors' conclusions: No firm conclusions can be drawn about the effects of single-component interventions due to limited evidence. Multicomponent interventions may not reduce the sales of non-prescription antimicrobial drugs in community pharmacies, drugstores, and other medicine outlets; however, the evidence is of very low certainty. Further studies on this topic are needed, particularly to assess the effects of important single interventions such as improving pharmaceutical policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少社区药房非处方抗菌药物销售的干预措施。
背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个主要的全球卫生问题。抗菌素耐药性的最重要原因之一是在卫生保健和社区环境中过度和不适当地使用抗菌药物。大多数国家的政策要求抗菌药物必须凭处方从药店获得。术语“非处方抗菌药物销售”是指在药品政策不允许在没有处方的情况下销售抗菌药物的国家,在没有处方的情况下配发和销售抗菌药物。药店、药店和其他药品销售点是社区环境中非处方抗微生物药物销售的主要来源。目的:评估干预措施对减少社区药房、药店和其他药品网点药师和非药师非处方抗菌药物销售的效果。评估干预措施的效果是否因干预措施类型(单一或多成分)、社区药房人员(药剂师或非药剂师)和国家(低收入至中低收入和中高收入至高收入)而异。检索方法:检索了5个数据库,包括CENTRAL、MEDLINE和Embase,以及两个试验注册库,截止到2022年9月26日。我们还进行了参考资料核查和引文检索。选择标准:我们纳入随机试验、集群随机试验和准随机试验,评估针对社区药房、药店和其他药品销售点的药剂师和非药剂师的干预措施。我们的主要结局是非处方抗菌药物销售、药房客户或社区居民中由耐药病原体引起的症状或无症状感染,以及药房客户中与非处方抗菌药物使用相关的不良事件。我们的次要结局是对药房客户的病史和提供建议,以及药剂师和非药剂师的知识。资料收集与分析:采用标准Cochrane方法。主要结果:我们纳入了在药店进行的4项试验。2000年至2010年期间发表了三项研究,第四项研究于2016年发表。共有942家社区药房和药店参与,包括药剂师和非药剂师。在苏格兰进行的一项研究是一项四组试验,包括教育外展访问,继续专业教育,以及两者结合作为干预措施,与仅提供指导材料的对照组相比。在葡萄牙和乌干达进行的两项研究比较了培训和分发书面材料的结合与不干预的控制。在泰国和越南进行的一项研究比较了三种干预措施(监管执法、教育和同伴监督)的顺序和不干预的控制。纳入的研究仅评估了非处方抗微生物药物的销售、用药史和向药房客户提供建议以及药剂师和非药剂师的知识;没有研究评估其他结果。我们判断非处方抗菌药物销售的总体偏倚风险为高风险,其他两个结果值得关注。在苏格兰进行的一项研究评估了单组分干预(两个干预组)与书面指南对照,并报告了一个主要结果和一个次要结果。非处方抗菌药物销售:本研究根据模拟患者情景报告了抗菌药物的销售或不销售情况。在没有处方的情况下,抗真菌药物不应该出售,但没有报告干预组和对照组之间的任何差异。这一结果的证据的确定性非常低。药剂师和非药剂师的知识:研究报告了基线和随访时的知识得分,但没有比较两个单组分干预组和对照组在两个时间点的得分。四项研究评估了多组分干预与对照书面指南或不干预,并报告了一个主要结果和两个次要结果。非处方抗菌药物销售:在乌干达、泰国和越南进行的两项研究涉及337家随机社区药店和药店,使用模拟客户方法报告了非处方抗菌药物销售占总请求数量的比例。基于投票计数,两项研究都倾向于干预,即多组分干预减少了药剂师和非药剂师非处方抗菌药物的销售。另外两项研究的信息不足以说明这一主要结果。 葡萄牙的一项研究报告说,在多成分干预后,市政一级的抗生素总消费量(包括处方和非处方抗生素销售)有所减少。在苏格兰进行的这项研究评估了多组分干预(在一个干预组中),并根据模拟的患者情况报告了抗真菌药物的销售或不销售。在没有处方的情况下,抗真菌药物不应该出售,但没有报告干预组和对照组之间的任何差异。这一结果的证据的确定性非常低。向药房客户提供病史和建议:在乌干达、泰国和越南进行的两项研究报告了这一结果。在泰国和越南,干预组中药剂师和非药剂师的做法有所改善,而乌干达报告了自相矛盾的下降。药剂师和非药剂师的知识:在苏格兰进行的研究报告了基线和随访时的知识得分,但没有比较多成分干预组和对照组在两个时间点的得分。作者结论:由于证据有限,无法得出关于单组分干预效果的确切结论。多成分干预措施可能不会减少社区药房、药店和其他药品销售点的非处方抗微生物药物销售;然而,证据的确定性非常低。需要对这一主题进行进一步研究,特别是评估诸如改进药物政策等重要单一干预措施的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
期刊最新文献
Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies for people with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis. Insulin-like growth factor-1 for the prevention or treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Post-exposure prophylaxis with antibiotics to prevent sexually transmitted infections. Penetrating versus non-penetrating mesh fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1