Red blood cell transfusion management for people undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD009752.pub3
Kirstin L Wilkinson, Catherine Kimber, Alisha Allana, Carolyn Dorée, Rita Champaneria, Susan J Brunskill, Michael F Murphy
{"title":"Red blood cell transfusion management for people undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease.","authors":"Kirstin L Wilkinson, Catherine Kimber, Alisha Allana, Carolyn Dorée, Rita Champaneria, Susan J Brunskill, Michael F Murphy","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD009752.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital heart disease is the most common neonatal congenital condition. Surgery is often necessary. Patients with congenital heart disease are potentially exposed to red cell transfusion preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively when admitted for cardiac surgery. There are a number of risks associated with red cell transfusion that may increase morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association of red blood cell transfusion management with mortality and morbidity in people with congenital heart disease who are undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched multiple bibliographic databases and trials registries, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Transfusion Evidence Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) ICTRP. The most recent search was on 2 January 2024, with no limitation by language of publication.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing red blood cell transfusion interventions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Participants of any age (neonates, paediatrics and adults) and with any type of congenital heart disease (cyanotic or acyanotic) were eligible for inclusion. No comorbidities were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two of five (AA, CK, KW, SB, SF) review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. We contacted study authors for additional information. Two review authors (CK, KW) used GRADE methodology to assess evidence certainty for critical outcomes and comparisons.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We identified 19 relevant trials. The trials had 1606 participants, all of whom were neonates or children. No trials were conducted in the preoperative period or with adults. The trials compared different types of red blood cell transfusions. No trial compared red blood cell transfusion versus no red blood cell transfusion. None of the trials was at low risk of bias overall. Eight trials had a high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly, blinding of participants and personnel. For our critical outcomes, we judged the certainty of the evidence based on GRADE criteria to be low or very low. Five trials (497 participants) compared a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion-trigger. It is very uncertain whether a restrictive transfusion-trigger has an effect on all-cause mortality in the short-term (0 to 30 days post-surgery) (risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 3.00; 3 RCTs, 347 participants; very low certainty evidence) or long term (31 days to two years post-surgery) (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; 1 RCT, 60 participants; very low certainty evidence). The evidence is also very uncertain on the incidence of severe adverse cardiac events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.37; 2 RCTs, 232 participants) and infection (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.39; 2 RCTs, 232 participants) (both very low certainty evidence). A restrictive transfusion-trigger may have little to no effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -1.65, 95% CI -3.51 to 0.2; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence) or of ICU stay (MD 0.15, 95% CI -0.72 to 1.01; 3 RCTs, 228 participants, low-certainty evidence). Five trials (231 participants) compared washed red blood cells in CPB prime versus unwashed red blood cells in CPB prime. Washing red blood cells in CPB prime may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality in the short term (0 to 30 days post-surgery) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.18; 2 RCTs, 144 participants) or long term (31 days to 2 years post-surgery) (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.38; 1 RCT, 128 participants) (both low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of washed CPB prime on severe cardiac adverse events (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.64), infection (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.99) and duration of ICU stay (MD -0.3, 95% CI -4.32 to 3.72) (1 RCT, 128 participants; very low certainty evidence). Two trials (76 participants) compared crystalloid (bloodless) CPB prime versus red-blood-cell-containing CPB prime. It is very uncertain whether bloodless prime has an effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation (median 8.0 hours, interquartile range (IQR) 6.8 to 9.0 hours versus median 7.0 hours, IQR 6.0 to 8.0 hours; 1 RCT, 40 participants) or duration of ICU stay (median 23.0 hours, IQR 21.8 to 41.5 hours versus median 23.5 hours, IQR 21.0 to 29.0 hours; 1 RCT, 40 participants) (both very low certainty evidence). Two trials (160 participants) compared ultrafiltration of CPB prime versus no ultrafiltration. It is very uncertain whether ultrafiltration of CPB prime has an effect on all-cause mortality in the short term (0 to 30 days post-surgery) (RR not estimable; 1 RCT, 50 participants; very low certainty evidence). Ultrafiltration may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -16.00, 95% CI -25.00 to -7.00) and the duration of ICU stay (MD -0.6, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.36) (1 RCT, 50 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial (59 participants) compared retrograde autologous CPB prime versus standard CPB prime. It is very uncertain whether retrograde autologous CPB prime has an effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.07) or duration of ICU stay (MD 0, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01) (1 RCT, 59 participants; very low certainty evidence). One trial (178 participants) compared 'fresh' (not near expiry date) versus 'old' (near expiry date) red blood cell transfusion but did not report on our outcomes.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>No randomised controlled trial compared red blood cell transfusion against no red blood cell transfusion in people with congential heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. There are only small, heterogeneous trials in children that compare different forms of red blood cell transfusion, and there are no trials at all in adults. There is therefore insufficient evidence to accurately assess the association of red blood cell transfusion with the morbidity and mortality of patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. It is possible that trial outcomes are affected by the presence or absence of cyanosis, so this should be considered in future trial design. Further adequately powered, high-quality trials in both children and adults are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"3 ","pages":"CD009752"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009752.pub3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Congenital heart disease is the most common neonatal congenital condition. Surgery is often necessary. Patients with congenital heart disease are potentially exposed to red cell transfusion preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively when admitted for cardiac surgery. There are a number of risks associated with red cell transfusion that may increase morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: To evaluate the association of red blood cell transfusion management with mortality and morbidity in people with congenital heart disease who are undergoing cardiac surgery.

Search methods: We searched multiple bibliographic databases and trials registries, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Transfusion Evidence Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) ICTRP. The most recent search was on 2 January 2024, with no limitation by language of publication.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing red blood cell transfusion interventions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Participants of any age (neonates, paediatrics and adults) and with any type of congenital heart disease (cyanotic or acyanotic) were eligible for inclusion. No comorbidities were excluded.

Data collection and analysis: Two of five (AA, CK, KW, SB, SF) review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. We contacted study authors for additional information. Two review authors (CK, KW) used GRADE methodology to assess evidence certainty for critical outcomes and comparisons.

Main results: We identified 19 relevant trials. The trials had 1606 participants, all of whom were neonates or children. No trials were conducted in the preoperative period or with adults. The trials compared different types of red blood cell transfusions. No trial compared red blood cell transfusion versus no red blood cell transfusion. None of the trials was at low risk of bias overall. Eight trials had a high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly, blinding of participants and personnel. For our critical outcomes, we judged the certainty of the evidence based on GRADE criteria to be low or very low. Five trials (497 participants) compared a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion-trigger. It is very uncertain whether a restrictive transfusion-trigger has an effect on all-cause mortality in the short-term (0 to 30 days post-surgery) (risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 3.00; 3 RCTs, 347 participants; very low certainty evidence) or long term (31 days to two years post-surgery) (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; 1 RCT, 60 participants; very low certainty evidence). The evidence is also very uncertain on the incidence of severe adverse cardiac events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.37; 2 RCTs, 232 participants) and infection (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.39; 2 RCTs, 232 participants) (both very low certainty evidence). A restrictive transfusion-trigger may have little to no effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -1.65, 95% CI -3.51 to 0.2; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence) or of ICU stay (MD 0.15, 95% CI -0.72 to 1.01; 3 RCTs, 228 participants, low-certainty evidence). Five trials (231 participants) compared washed red blood cells in CPB prime versus unwashed red blood cells in CPB prime. Washing red blood cells in CPB prime may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality in the short term (0 to 30 days post-surgery) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.18; 2 RCTs, 144 participants) or long term (31 days to 2 years post-surgery) (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.38; 1 RCT, 128 participants) (both low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of washed CPB prime on severe cardiac adverse events (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.64), infection (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.99) and duration of ICU stay (MD -0.3, 95% CI -4.32 to 3.72) (1 RCT, 128 participants; very low certainty evidence). Two trials (76 participants) compared crystalloid (bloodless) CPB prime versus red-blood-cell-containing CPB prime. It is very uncertain whether bloodless prime has an effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation (median 8.0 hours, interquartile range (IQR) 6.8 to 9.0 hours versus median 7.0 hours, IQR 6.0 to 8.0 hours; 1 RCT, 40 participants) or duration of ICU stay (median 23.0 hours, IQR 21.8 to 41.5 hours versus median 23.5 hours, IQR 21.0 to 29.0 hours; 1 RCT, 40 participants) (both very low certainty evidence). Two trials (160 participants) compared ultrafiltration of CPB prime versus no ultrafiltration. It is very uncertain whether ultrafiltration of CPB prime has an effect on all-cause mortality in the short term (0 to 30 days post-surgery) (RR not estimable; 1 RCT, 50 participants; very low certainty evidence). Ultrafiltration may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -16.00, 95% CI -25.00 to -7.00) and the duration of ICU stay (MD -0.6, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.36) (1 RCT, 50 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial (59 participants) compared retrograde autologous CPB prime versus standard CPB prime. It is very uncertain whether retrograde autologous CPB prime has an effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.07) or duration of ICU stay (MD 0, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01) (1 RCT, 59 participants; very low certainty evidence). One trial (178 participants) compared 'fresh' (not near expiry date) versus 'old' (near expiry date) red blood cell transfusion but did not report on our outcomes.

Authors' conclusions: No randomised controlled trial compared red blood cell transfusion against no red blood cell transfusion in people with congential heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. There are only small, heterogeneous trials in children that compare different forms of red blood cell transfusion, and there are no trials at all in adults. There is therefore insufficient evidence to accurately assess the association of red blood cell transfusion with the morbidity and mortality of patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. It is possible that trial outcomes are affected by the presence or absence of cyanosis, so this should be considered in future trial design. Further adequately powered, high-quality trials in both children and adults are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:先天性心脏病是最常见的新生儿先天性疾病:先天性心脏病是最常见的新生儿先天性疾病。通常需要进行手术治疗。先天性心脏病患者在接受心脏手术时,有可能在术前、术中和术后接受红细胞输注。输注红细胞有很多风险,可能会增加发病率和死亡率:目的:评估接受心脏手术的先天性心脏病患者输注红细胞的管理与死亡率和发病率的关系:我们检索了多个文献数据库和试验登记册,包括 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册 (CENTRAL)、MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、输血证据图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织 (WHO) ICTRP。最新检索日期为 2024 年 1 月 2 日,检索语言不限:我们纳入了对因先天性心脏病接受心脏手术的患者输注红细胞干预措施进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。任何年龄(新生儿、儿科和成人)、患有任何类型先天性心脏病(紫绀型或无紫绀型)的参与者均符合纳入条件。数据收集与分析:五位评审作者(AA、CK、KW、SB、SF)中的两位独立提取数据并评估试验的偏倚风险。我们联系了研究作者以获取更多信息。两位综述作者(CK、KW)使用 GRADE 方法评估关键结果和比较的证据确定性:我们确定了 19 项相关试验。这些试验共有1606名参与者,均为新生儿或儿童。没有一项试验是在术前或成人中进行的。这些试验比较了不同类型的红细胞输注。没有一项试验对输注红细胞与不输注红细胞进行了比较。没有一项试验的总体偏倚风险较低。八项试验至少在一个方面存在高偏倚风险,其中最常见的是对参与者和工作人员的盲法。对于关键结果,我们根据 GRADE 标准判定证据的确定性为低或极低。五项试验(497 名参与者)比较了限制性输血触发与宽松性输血触发。限制性输血触发对短期(术后 0 至 30 天)全因死亡率(风险比 (RR) 1.12,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.42 至 3.00;3 项 RCT,347 名参与者;确定性极低的证据)或长期(术后 31 天至两年)全因死亡率(RR 0.33,95% CI 0.01 至 7.87;1 项 RCT,60 名参与者;确定性极低的证据)是否有影响还很不确定。关于严重不良心脏事件的发生率(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.73 至 1.37;2 项 RCT,232 名参与者)和感染(RR 0.81,95% CI 0.47 至 1.39;2 项 RCT,232 名参与者),证据也很不确定(均为确定性很低的证据)。限制性输血触发对机械通气时间(平均差(MD)-1.65,95% CI -3.51至0.2;2项研究,168名参与者;低确定性证据)或ICU住院时间(MD 0.15,95% CI -0.72至1.01;3项研究,228名参与者,低确定性证据)几乎没有影响。五项试验(231 名参与者)比较了 CPB 原液中的洗涤红细胞与 CPB 原液中的未洗涤红细胞。在 CPB 原液中清洗红细胞可能对短期(术后 0 至 30 天)(RR 0.25,95% CI 0.03 至 2.18;2 项 RCT,144 名参与者)或长期(术后 31 天至 2 年)(RR 0.50,95% CI 0.05 至 5.38;1 项 RCT,128 名参与者)全因死亡率几乎没有影响(均为低确定性证据)。关于洗净 CPB 原液对严重心脏不良事件(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.47 至 1.64)、感染(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.50 至 1.99)和重症监护室住院时间(MD -0.3,95% CI -4.32 至 3.72)的影响,证据非常不确定(1 项 RCT,128 名参与者;极低确定性证据)。两项试验(76 名参与者)比较了晶体液(无血)CPB 预处理与含红细胞 CPB 预处理。目前尚不确定无血预处理对机械通气时间(中位数 8.0 小时,四分位数间距 (IQR) 6.8 至 9.0 小时;中位数 7.0 小时,四分位数间距 6.0 至 8.0 小时;1 项研究,40 名参与者)或重症监护室住院时间(中位数 23.0 小时,四分位数间距 21.8 至 41.5 小时;中位数 23.5 小时,四分位数间距 21.0 至 29.0 小时;1 项研究,40 名参与者)是否有影响(这两项证据的确定性都很低)。两项试验(160 名参与者)比较了 CPB 原液超滤与不超滤。目前尚不确定 CPB 原液超滤在短期内(术后 0 至 30 天)是否对全因死亡率有影响(RR 无法估计;1 项 RCT,50 名参与者;极低确定性证据)。超滤可缩短机械通气时间(MD -16. 00,95% CI -25.00 至 -7.00)和 ICU 住院时间(MD -0.6,95% CI -0.84 至 -0.36)(1 项 RCT,50 名参与者;低确定性证据)。一项试验(59 名参与者)比较了逆行自体 CPB 预处理与标准 CPB 预处理。目前尚不确定逆行自体心肺复苏术对机械通气时间(MD 0.02,95% CI -0.03-0.07)或重症监护室住院时间(MD 0,95% CI -0.01-0.01)是否有影响(1 项 RCT,59 名参与者;极低确定性证据)。一项试验(178 名参与者)比较了 "新鲜"(未接近有效期)与 "陈旧"(接近有效期)红细胞输注,但未报告我们的结果:没有随机对照试验对接受心脏手术的充血性心脏病患者输注红细胞与不输注红细胞进行比较。目前只有针对儿童的小规模异质性试验对不同形式的输注红细胞进行了比较,而针对成人的试验则完全没有。因此,没有足够的证据来准确评估输注红细胞与接受心脏手术的先天性心脏病患者的发病率和死亡率之间的关系。试验结果可能会受到是否存在紫绀的影响,因此在未来的试验设计中应考虑到这一点。我们需要在儿童和成人中开展更多有充分证据支持的高质量试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis of surgically resected clinical stage 1A non-small cell lung cancers manifesting as a subsolid nodule on computed tomography including pure ground glass nodules. Red blood cell transfusion management for people undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review. Statins for preventing preeclampsia. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute renal colic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1