Impact of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion on Inpatient Cost: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the US Nationwide Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Database
Victoria Yin, Scott M. Atay, John C. S. Rodman, Sean C. Wightman, Graeme M. Rosenberg, Brooks V. Udelsman, Anthony W. Kim, Takashi Harano
{"title":"Impact of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion on Inpatient Cost: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the US Nationwide Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Database","authors":"Victoria Yin, Scott M. Atay, John C. S. Rodman, Sean C. Wightman, Graeme M. Rosenberg, Brooks V. Udelsman, Anthony W. Kim, Takashi Harano","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The goal of this study was to investigate the association between ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) use and inpatient hospitalization cost for lung transplantation in a nationwide sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Lung transplantation patients in 2018–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) were grouped based on use of EVLP. The primary outcome was total inpatient hospitalization cost. 1:2 propensity score matching by EVLP status was performed followed by multivariable linear regression to determine the association between inpatient cost and EVLP while adjusting for pre-transplant hospital days, high volume EVLP center status, and propensity score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 3902 lung transplants and 118 (3%) were recipients of EVLP lungs. Among EVLP patients, the median cost was $871 468 (IQR: $608 671–1 274 392), compared to $846 516 (IQR: $531 462–1 439 267, <i>p</i> = 0.871) among the total non-EVLP cohort. After 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort, recipients of EVLP lungs had longer median hospital length of stay (<i>p</i> = 0.046). In the multivariable model using the matched sample, increased cost was not associated with EVLP use (<i>p</i> = 0.783); however, high volume EVLP centers were associated with decreased cost (<i>p</i> = 0.018).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>EVLP use was not associated with greater inpatient costs and may be favorable at high volume centers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The goal of this study was to investigate the association between ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) use and inpatient hospitalization cost for lung transplantation in a nationwide sample.
Methods
Lung transplantation patients in 2018–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) were grouped based on use of EVLP. The primary outcome was total inpatient hospitalization cost. 1:2 propensity score matching by EVLP status was performed followed by multivariable linear regression to determine the association between inpatient cost and EVLP while adjusting for pre-transplant hospital days, high volume EVLP center status, and propensity score.
Results
There were 3902 lung transplants and 118 (3%) were recipients of EVLP lungs. Among EVLP patients, the median cost was $871 468 (IQR: $608 671–1 274 392), compared to $846 516 (IQR: $531 462–1 439 267, p = 0.871) among the total non-EVLP cohort. After 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort, recipients of EVLP lungs had longer median hospital length of stay (p = 0.046). In the multivariable model using the matched sample, increased cost was not associated with EVLP use (p = 0.783); however, high volume EVLP centers were associated with decreased cost (p = 0.018).
Conclusions
EVLP use was not associated with greater inpatient costs and may be favorable at high volume centers.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.