Imiquimod Cream Preceded by Superficial Curettage vs Surgical Excision for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Babette J A Verkouteren, Patty J Nelemans, Kelly A E Sinx, Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets, Véronique J L Winnepenninckx, Aimée H M M Arits, Klara Mosterd
{"title":"Imiquimod Cream Preceded by Superficial Curettage vs Surgical Excision for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Babette J A Verkouteren, Patty J Nelemans, Kelly A E Sinx, Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets, Véronique J L Winnepenninckx, Aimée H M M Arits, Klara Mosterd","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interest in noninvasive treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has been increasing. For superficial BCC, it has been demonstrated that imiquimod cream, 5%, has high long-term efficacy, but for nodular BCC (nBCC), long-term evidence is sparse.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether superficial curettage (SC) followed by imiquimod cream, 5%, is noninferior to surgical excision (SE) in nBCC after 5 years of treatment.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the noninferiority Surgery Versus Combined Treatment With Curettage and Imiquimod for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma (SCIN) randomized clinical trial, patients with a primary nBCC of 4 to 20 mm were assigned to either SC plus imiquimod, 5%, or SE between January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2017, at 2 outpatient dermatology departments in the Netherlands. The primary outcome of the SCIN trial was the 1-year probability of remaining free from treatment failure; the prespecified secondary trial outcomes were the probability after 5 years of follow-up, completed September 7, 2022. Both an intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis were planned.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>SC plus imiquimod vs SE.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The 5-year probability of remaining free from treatment failure (ie, freedom from recurrence; with 95% CI) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis using data on treatment response from 3 planned follow-up visits at 3 months and 1 and 5 years after the end-of-treatment date. Additional analyses accounting for death as competing risk were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 patients (77 [53.1%] male; median age, 68 [IQR, 31-89] years) with a primary, histologically proven nBCC were randomized to treatment with SC plus imiquimod (n = 73) or SE (n = 72). In total, 15 treatment failures occurred in the SC plus imiquimod group (5 treatment failures occurred between 1 and 5 years after treatment) and 1 in the SE group. The 5-year probability of remaining free from treatment failure was 77.8% (95% CI, 65.7%-86.0%) after SC plus imiquimod and 98.2% (95% CI, 88.0%-99.8%) after SE. The relative risk of treatment failure was 15.93 (95% CI, 2.10-120.64). The 95% CI does not exclude the noninferiority margin of 5.22. Death due to causes unrelated to BCC occurred in 20 patients, and the subhazard ratio from competing risk regression was 16.16 (95% CI, 2.18-119.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that although it cannot be concluded that SC plus imiquimod is noninferior to SE, SC plus imiquimod was substantially less effective at 5 years after treatment. Most treatment failures occurred in the first year after treatment, and the probability of tumor-free survival 5 years after treatment with SC plus imiquimod was still 77.8%. The information in this trial can be used to counsel patients on the relative benefits and trade-offs of the different treatment options for nBCC.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicialTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02242929.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Interest in noninvasive treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has been increasing. For superficial BCC, it has been demonstrated that imiquimod cream, 5%, has high long-term efficacy, but for nodular BCC (nBCC), long-term evidence is sparse.
Objectives: To evaluate whether superficial curettage (SC) followed by imiquimod cream, 5%, is noninferior to surgical excision (SE) in nBCC after 5 years of treatment.
Design, setting, and participants: In this secondary analysis of the noninferiority Surgery Versus Combined Treatment With Curettage and Imiquimod for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma (SCIN) randomized clinical trial, patients with a primary nBCC of 4 to 20 mm were assigned to either SC plus imiquimod, 5%, or SE between January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2017, at 2 outpatient dermatology departments in the Netherlands. The primary outcome of the SCIN trial was the 1-year probability of remaining free from treatment failure; the prespecified secondary trial outcomes were the probability after 5 years of follow-up, completed September 7, 2022. Both an intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis were planned.
Intervention: SC plus imiquimod vs SE.
Main outcomes and measures: The 5-year probability of remaining free from treatment failure (ie, freedom from recurrence; with 95% CI) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis using data on treatment response from 3 planned follow-up visits at 3 months and 1 and 5 years after the end-of-treatment date. Additional analyses accounting for death as competing risk were also performed.
Results: A total of 145 patients (77 [53.1%] male; median age, 68 [IQR, 31-89] years) with a primary, histologically proven nBCC were randomized to treatment with SC plus imiquimod (n = 73) or SE (n = 72). In total, 15 treatment failures occurred in the SC plus imiquimod group (5 treatment failures occurred between 1 and 5 years after treatment) and 1 in the SE group. The 5-year probability of remaining free from treatment failure was 77.8% (95% CI, 65.7%-86.0%) after SC plus imiquimod and 98.2% (95% CI, 88.0%-99.8%) after SE. The relative risk of treatment failure was 15.93 (95% CI, 2.10-120.64). The 95% CI does not exclude the noninferiority margin of 5.22. Death due to causes unrelated to BCC occurred in 20 patients, and the subhazard ratio from competing risk regression was 16.16 (95% CI, 2.18-119.72).
Conclusions: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that although it cannot be concluded that SC plus imiquimod is noninferior to SE, SC plus imiquimod was substantially less effective at 5 years after treatment. Most treatment failures occurred in the first year after treatment, and the probability of tumor-free survival 5 years after treatment with SC plus imiquimod was still 77.8%. The information in this trial can be used to counsel patients on the relative benefits and trade-offs of the different treatment options for nBCC.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery.
JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care.
The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists.
JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.