Submucosal Microbiome Profiles in Paired and Unpaired Samples From Healthy and Peri-Implantitis Dental Implants

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/cid.13423
Oscar Iván Tocarruncho, Yineth Neuta, Yamil Lesmes, Diana Marcela Castillo, Sandra Leal, Leandro Chambrone, Gloria Inés Lafaurie
{"title":"Submucosal Microbiome Profiles in Paired and Unpaired Samples From Healthy and Peri-Implantitis Dental Implants","authors":"Oscar Iván Tocarruncho,&nbsp;Yineth Neuta,&nbsp;Yamil Lesmes,&nbsp;Diana Marcela Castillo,&nbsp;Sandra Leal,&nbsp;Leandro Chambrone,&nbsp;Gloria Inés Lafaurie","doi":"10.1111/cid.13423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the composition of the submucosal microbiome of peri-implantitis with paired and unpaired healthy implant samples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated submucosal plaque samples obtained in 39 cases, including 13 cases of peri-implantitis, 13 cases involving healthy implants from the same patient (paired samples), and 13 cases involving healthy implants from different individuals (unpaired samples). The patients were evaluated using next-generation genomic sequencing (Illumina) based on 16S rRNA gene amplification. The sequences were grouped according to the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) to define the taxonomic categories. Alpha diversity was analyzed using Shannon's and Simpson's indices, while beta diversity was evaluated using principal coordinate analysis, analysis of similarities, and permutational multivariate variance analysis. Additionally, UniFrac distances were evaluated using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2. Finally, we evaluated between-group differences in the taxonomic components.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no significant between-group differences in alpha diversity. The average bacterial ratios of <i>Filifactor alocis, Porphyromona endodontalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Peptostreptococcaceae [Eubacterium nodatum], Desulfobulbus sp.</i> HTM 041, and <i>Mogibacterium timidum</i> significantly differed between peri-implantitis samples and unpaired samples from the healthy implants (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). However, there were few differences in the microbiota between peri-implantitis samples and those paired with healthy implants in the same patient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Future studies comparing the microbiome compositions using sequencing techniques between healthy implants and implants with peri-implantitis should focus on retrieving samples from the same patient, especially in individuals with a history of periodontitis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the composition of the submucosal microbiome of peri-implantitis with paired and unpaired healthy implant samples.

Methods

We evaluated submucosal plaque samples obtained in 39 cases, including 13 cases of peri-implantitis, 13 cases involving healthy implants from the same patient (paired samples), and 13 cases involving healthy implants from different individuals (unpaired samples). The patients were evaluated using next-generation genomic sequencing (Illumina) based on 16S rRNA gene amplification. The sequences were grouped according to the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) to define the taxonomic categories. Alpha diversity was analyzed using Shannon's and Simpson's indices, while beta diversity was evaluated using principal coordinate analysis, analysis of similarities, and permutational multivariate variance analysis. Additionally, UniFrac distances were evaluated using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2. Finally, we evaluated between-group differences in the taxonomic components.

Results

There were no significant between-group differences in alpha diversity. The average bacterial ratios of Filifactor alocis, Porphyromona endodontalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Peptostreptococcaceae [Eubacterium nodatum], Desulfobulbus sp. HTM 041, and Mogibacterium timidum significantly differed between peri-implantitis samples and unpaired samples from the healthy implants (p < 0.05). However, there were few differences in the microbiota between peri-implantitis samples and those paired with healthy implants in the same patient.

Conclusions

Future studies comparing the microbiome compositions using sequencing techniques between healthy implants and implants with peri-implantitis should focus on retrieving samples from the same patient, especially in individuals with a history of periodontitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Clinical and Radiographic 3 Years Retrospective Study for Two Types of Locator Retained Mandibular Implant Overdenture Accuracy of a Cascade Network for Semi-Supervised Maxillary Sinus Detection and Sinus Cyst Classification Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Multi-Variate Analysis of Influencing Factors Outcome of Single Dental Implants Over 38–40 Years: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Implant Placement With Simultaneous Horizontal Bone Augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1