Is access to crisis teams associated with changes in behavioral health mortality?

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf003
Helen Newton, Tamara Beetham, Susan H Busch
{"title":"Is access to crisis teams associated with changes in behavioral health mortality?","authors":"Helen Newton, Tamara Beetham, Susan H Busch","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral health-related mortality-deaths from suicide, drug overdose, and acute alcohol injury-are leading causes of death among US adults. Crisis teams, trained behavioral health professionals who serve as first responders to assess and stabilize clients in crisis, as well as refer to treatment as necessary, have been shown to reduce psychiatric hospitalizations, but whether crisis teams reduce behavioral health mortality has not been studied. We assessed the association between changes in access to crisis team programs and changes in county-level suicide, drug overdose, and acute alcohol injury mortality from 2014 through 2019. We found that 250 (9%) of counties experienced crisis team program entry and another 237 (9%) experienced crisis team program closure. Access to crisis team programs was associated with significant changes in county-level drug overdose deaths, but not suicide or acute alcohol injury. Compared with counties with no change in access, crisis team program entry was associated with a 7% reduction in county-level drug overdose death rates, and crisis team program closure was associated with a 13% increase in drug overdose death rates. These findings may support the use of crisis teams as 1 intervention to address substance use disorder treatment gaps in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 1","pages":"qxaf003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral health-related mortality-deaths from suicide, drug overdose, and acute alcohol injury-are leading causes of death among US adults. Crisis teams, trained behavioral health professionals who serve as first responders to assess and stabilize clients in crisis, as well as refer to treatment as necessary, have been shown to reduce psychiatric hospitalizations, but whether crisis teams reduce behavioral health mortality has not been studied. We assessed the association between changes in access to crisis team programs and changes in county-level suicide, drug overdose, and acute alcohol injury mortality from 2014 through 2019. We found that 250 (9%) of counties experienced crisis team program entry and another 237 (9%) experienced crisis team program closure. Access to crisis team programs was associated with significant changes in county-level drug overdose deaths, but not suicide or acute alcohol injury. Compared with counties with no change in access, crisis team program entry was associated with a 7% reduction in county-level drug overdose death rates, and crisis team program closure was associated with a 13% increase in drug overdose death rates. These findings may support the use of crisis teams as 1 intervention to address substance use disorder treatment gaps in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得危机处理小组与行为健康死亡率的变化有关吗?
与行为相关的死亡——自杀、药物过量和急性酒精伤害——是美国成年人死亡的主要原因。危机小组,训练有素的行为健康专业人员,作为第一响应者,在危机中评估和稳定客户,并在必要时提供治疗,已被证明可以减少精神病住院治疗,但危机小组是否降低行为健康死亡率尚未得到研究。我们评估了2014年至2019年期间,危机团队项目准入变化与县级自杀、药物过量和急性酒精损伤死亡率变化之间的关系。我们发现250个县(9%)经历了危机小组项目的进入,另外237个县(9%)经历了危机小组项目的关闭。参与危机小组项目与县级药物过量死亡的显著变化有关,但与自杀或急性酒精伤害无关。与可及性没有变化的县相比,危机小组项目的进入与县级药物过量死亡率降低7%有关,危机小组项目的结束与药物过量死亡率增加13%有关。这些发现可能支持使用危机小组作为解决美国物质使用障碍治疗差距的一种干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variation in supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage affinity plans, 2022-2024. Will AI-written and AI-reviewed preprints from aiXiv be bibliometrically accepted? Patterns and implications of 2025 NIH-F31 grant terminations for the predoctoral training pipeline. What are the true medical concerns facing unsheltered homeless adults? ICER's launch price and access report: 5 key takeaways and 5 questions we should all be asking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1