Larissa Maiara da Silva Alves Souza, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Ana Paula Dias De Oliveira, Laura Rossi, Viviane Martins da Silva, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros
{"title":"Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure.","authors":"Larissa Maiara da Silva Alves Souza, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Ana Paula Dias De Oliveira, Laura Rossi, Viviane Martins da Silva, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the accuracy of nursing diagnoses at hospital admission and discharge for patients with heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative study examined the documentation in 155 medical records of patients with an admitting diagnosis of HF during August 2018 and July 2019. An audit tool was used to record the diagnoses made by nurses during routine care at the time of admission and discharge. Two researchers (L.S. and A.C.) examined the records and evaluated the documented nursing diagnoses using the Nursing Diagnosis Accuracy Scale version 2. Kappa was used for agreement between them. Patient social and clinical characteristics were described using percentages, absolute frequencies, means, and standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 18 unique nursing diagnoses were identified across the 155 patients. Among the 754 nursing diagnoses recorded, 85% of those identified at admission (n = 644) were deemed highly accurate. At discharge, of the 527 diagnoses recorded, 66% (n = 349) were rated as highly accurate. Excess fluid volume was the most common diagnosis (85% at admission, 49% at discharge). Three risk diagnoses were frequent at both points: risk for infection, risk for falls, and risk for decreased cardiac output. Agreement between evaluators ranged from Κ = 0.234 to 1.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater agreement in nursing diagnoses at discharge likely reflects ongoing patient monitoring. Persistent diagnoses at discharge highlight the need for continued nursing care post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>This study encourages nurses to improve clinical evaluation for HF patients from admission to discharge. As key clinical indicators are identified, nurses can improve the accuracy of their diagnoses and plan more effective interventions to achieve positive health outcomes and reduce unnecessary hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of nursing diagnoses at hospital admission and discharge for patients with heart failure (HF).
Methods: This comparative study examined the documentation in 155 medical records of patients with an admitting diagnosis of HF during August 2018 and July 2019. An audit tool was used to record the diagnoses made by nurses during routine care at the time of admission and discharge. Two researchers (L.S. and A.C.) examined the records and evaluated the documented nursing diagnoses using the Nursing Diagnosis Accuracy Scale version 2. Kappa was used for agreement between them. Patient social and clinical characteristics were described using percentages, absolute frequencies, means, and standard deviations.
Findings: A total of 18 unique nursing diagnoses were identified across the 155 patients. Among the 754 nursing diagnoses recorded, 85% of those identified at admission (n = 644) were deemed highly accurate. At discharge, of the 527 diagnoses recorded, 66% (n = 349) were rated as highly accurate. Excess fluid volume was the most common diagnosis (85% at admission, 49% at discharge). Three risk diagnoses were frequent at both points: risk for infection, risk for falls, and risk for decreased cardiac output. Agreement between evaluators ranged from Κ = 0.234 to 1.00.
Conclusions: Greater agreement in nursing diagnoses at discharge likely reflects ongoing patient monitoring. Persistent diagnoses at discharge highlight the need for continued nursing care post-discharge.
Implications for nursing practice: This study encourages nurses to improve clinical evaluation for HF patients from admission to discharge. As key clinical indicators are identified, nurses can improve the accuracy of their diagnoses and plan more effective interventions to achieve positive health outcomes and reduce unnecessary hospitalization.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge.
The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages.
The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy.
The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.