Development and validation of a prediction model of frailty risk in community-dwelling older adults: From a national longitudinal survey.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.055
Yongfei Dong, Qianqian Wang, Ke Zhang, Xichao Wang, Huan Liu, Yanjie Chen, Zaixiang Tang, Liping Tan
{"title":"Development and validation of a prediction model of frailty risk in community-dwelling older adults: From a national longitudinal survey.","authors":"Yongfei Dong, Qianqian Wang, Ke Zhang, Xichao Wang, Huan Liu, Yanjie Chen, Zaixiang Tang, Liping Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for frailty in elderly using a nationally representative longitudinal survey database.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Longitudinal study based on public databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three continuous cohorts of elderly aged 65 years or older from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, with the 2008-2018 cohort as the development cohort. 2005-2014 and 2002-2011 cohort as validation sets. Frailty was assessed using the FI constructed from 46 indicators of health deficits, with FI ≥ 0.25 considered frailty. Prediction models were constructed using Cox regression model. We assessed the predictive performance of the models using the concordance statistic and calibration accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,878 participants from the development cohort were enrolled with a median follow-up of 65 months. The prediction model contained 9 predictors: age, BMI, cognitive function, gender, ethnicity, education, natural teeth status, smoking status, and occupation. In the development cohort, the AUCs were 0.74, 0.78, and 0.80 at 36, 60, and 96 months. The AUCs were 0.68, 0.84, 0.85, and 0.70, 0.72, and 0.76 for two validation sets, respectively. Calibration performed well in the development and two validation sets, with a Brier score of <0.25. The prediction models constructed using machine learning algorithms showed similar predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated a model to predict the risk of incident frailty in elderly. The model provides insights to enable early screening and risk stratification for frailty in elderly, and to frame the development of individualized prevention of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for frailty in elderly using a nationally representative longitudinal survey database.

Study design: Longitudinal study based on public databases.

Methods: Three continuous cohorts of elderly aged 65 years or older from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, with the 2008-2018 cohort as the development cohort. 2005-2014 and 2002-2011 cohort as validation sets. Frailty was assessed using the FI constructed from 46 indicators of health deficits, with FI ≥ 0.25 considered frailty. Prediction models were constructed using Cox regression model. We assessed the predictive performance of the models using the concordance statistic and calibration accuracy.

Results: 4,878 participants from the development cohort were enrolled with a median follow-up of 65 months. The prediction model contained 9 predictors: age, BMI, cognitive function, gender, ethnicity, education, natural teeth status, smoking status, and occupation. In the development cohort, the AUCs were 0.74, 0.78, and 0.80 at 36, 60, and 96 months. The AUCs were 0.68, 0.84, 0.85, and 0.70, 0.72, and 0.76 for two validation sets, respectively. Calibration performed well in the development and two validation sets, with a Brier score of <0.25. The prediction models constructed using machine learning algorithms showed similar predictive performance.

Conclusions: We developed and validated a model to predict the risk of incident frailty in elderly. The model provides insights to enable early screening and risk stratification for frailty in elderly, and to frame the development of individualized prevention of frailty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
The effects of socio-economic and environmental factors on Korean suicidal ideation: A Bayesian multilevel analysis. Development and validation of a county deprivation index for assessing socio-economic disparities in the United States: Implications for public health outcomes and mitigation strategies. Development and validation of a prediction model of frailty risk in community-dwelling older adults: From a national longitudinal survey. Evaluating the impact of minimum unit alcohol pricing on purchasing behaviour by different social class and age groups in Wales: A controlled interrupted time series study. Vaccine hesitancy relates to vaccine hesitancy? Discovering nonlinear relations between differing operationalizations of vaccine hesitancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1