Identifying Emerging Drivers and Interventions to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy Among Long-Term Care Facility Nursing Staff.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf022
Kaitlin Quirk Brumbaugh, Louise Kaplan, Kris Pui Kwan Ma, Ali Mokdad, Bianca K Frogner, Francisco Rios Casas, Tara McCoy, Bruce Bello
{"title":"Identifying Emerging Drivers and Interventions to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy Among Long-Term Care Facility Nursing Staff.","authors":"Kaitlin Quirk Brumbaugh, Louise Kaplan, Kris Pui Kwan Ma, Ali Mokdad, Bianca K Frogner, Francisco Rios Casas, Tara McCoy, Bruce Bello","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The study aimed to identify key drivers of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs) employed at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) within selected states. It also sought to determine which interventions, policies, and programs effectively reduced HCW vaccine hesitancy for coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) and influenza.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study employed a mixed methods approach, combining secondary analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, survey research, and focus groups. BRFSS data on influenza and COVID-19 rates informed the selection of states for qualitative sampling frames. HCWs from LTCFs (i.e., skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes) were recruited to complete a survey based on the sampling frame. Additionally, administration and nursing management from participating facilities were invited to participate in focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey results (N = 199 from 23 facilities) showed vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in LTCFs is a complex issue influenced by several factors, such as lack of knowledge, misinformation, and doubts about vaccine safety, efficacy, risks, and benefits. Focus groups (N = 25 from 15 facilities) revealed a spectrum of vaccine hesitancy, ranging from acceptance to outright refusal. The survey and focus groups identified effective interventions to reduce HCW vaccine hesitancy, including educational campaigns, onsite vaccination, and vaccine recommendations from trusted nursing staff.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study provides important insights into addressing vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in LTCF. It highlights the moral and ethical responsibility for targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake in the healthcare sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The study aimed to identify key drivers of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs) employed at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) within selected states. It also sought to determine which interventions, policies, and programs effectively reduced HCW vaccine hesitancy for coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) and influenza.

Research design and methods: The study employed a mixed methods approach, combining secondary analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, survey research, and focus groups. BRFSS data on influenza and COVID-19 rates informed the selection of states for qualitative sampling frames. HCWs from LTCFs (i.e., skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes) were recruited to complete a survey based on the sampling frame. Additionally, administration and nursing management from participating facilities were invited to participate in focus groups.

Results: Survey results (N = 199 from 23 facilities) showed vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in LTCFs is a complex issue influenced by several factors, such as lack of knowledge, misinformation, and doubts about vaccine safety, efficacy, risks, and benefits. Focus groups (N = 25 from 15 facilities) revealed a spectrum of vaccine hesitancy, ranging from acceptance to outright refusal. The survey and focus groups identified effective interventions to reduce HCW vaccine hesitancy, including educational campaigns, onsite vaccination, and vaccine recommendations from trusted nursing staff.

Discussion and implications: This study provides important insights into addressing vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in LTCF. It highlights the moral and ethical responsibility for targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake in the healthcare sector.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定新出现的驱动因素和干预措施,以减少长期护理机构护理人员对疫苗的犹豫。
背景和目的:本研究旨在确定在选定州长期护理机构(LTCF)工作的卫生保健工作者(HCWs)中疫苗犹豫的关键驱动因素。它还试图确定哪些干预措施、政策和规划有效地减少了COVID-19和流感的HCW疫苗犹豫。研究设计和方法:本研究采用混合方法,将行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据的二次分析、调查研究和焦点小组研究相结合。BRFSS关于流感和COVID-19发病率的数据为选择定性抽样框架的州提供了信息。招募来自长期护理中心(即熟练护理机构和养老院)的医护人员根据抽样框架完成一项调查。此外,还邀请参与机构的行政和护理管理人员参加焦点小组。结果:调查结果(来自23家机构的199例)显示,长期卫生保健中心卫生保健工作者的疫苗犹豫是一个复杂的问题,受到多种因素的影响,如缺乏知识、错误信息和对疫苗安全性、有效性、风险和益处的怀疑。焦点小组(来自15家机构的25家)揭示了疫苗犹豫的范围,从接受到完全拒绝。调查和焦点小组确定了减少HCW疫苗犹豫的有效干预措施,包括教育运动、现场疫苗接种和值得信赖的护理人员的疫苗建议。讨论和意义:本研究为解决LTCF中卫生保健工作者的疫苗犹豫问题提供了重要见解。它强调了在卫生保健部门采取有针对性的干预措施以改善疫苗吸收的道德和伦理责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Ownership change in American nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic and the relationship with measures in donabedian's model of care quality. Routinized violence: examining long-term residential care workers' perspectives on involuntary treatment. Improving Care through Improv: pilot test results of an innovative training program for care partners of people living with dementia. Reducing ageism among Israeli Jew and Arab middle school students: a randomized controlled trial. What characterizes the exceptional cognition of superagers? A systematic review of multidomain biomarkers of successful cognitive aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1