A quantitative amplitude of vagus nerve obtained by intraoperative neuromonitoring predicts postoperative vocal cord paralysis among patients in thyroid/parathyroid surgery as a second option

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.009
Hiroshi Katoh MD, FACS , Riku Okamoto MD , Kanako Naito MD , Tomoya Mitsuma MD , Mariko Kikuchi MD , Takaaki Tokito MD , Takeshi Naitoh MD, FACS , Naoki Hiki MD , Yusuke Kumamoto MD , Takafumi Sangai MD
{"title":"A quantitative amplitude of vagus nerve obtained by intraoperative neuromonitoring predicts postoperative vocal cord paralysis among patients in thyroid/parathyroid surgery as a second option","authors":"Hiroshi Katoh MD, FACS ,&nbsp;Riku Okamoto MD ,&nbsp;Kanako Naito MD ,&nbsp;Tomoya Mitsuma MD ,&nbsp;Mariko Kikuchi MD ,&nbsp;Takaaki Tokito MD ,&nbsp;Takeshi Naitoh MD, FACS ,&nbsp;Naoki Hiki MD ,&nbsp;Yusuke Kumamoto MD ,&nbsp;Takafumi Sangai MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The advantage of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been widely accepted in thyroid/parathyroid surgery. However, there are discrepancies of amplitudes on recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy and vocal cord paralysis (VCP) because of amplitude variations among individuals. Accordingly, the universal usefulness of quantitative amplitude value <em>per se</em> among patients were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>IONM using a 4-step method (Vagus nerve (V1)-RLN (<em>R</em>1)-R2-V2) was applied to 777 RLNs (510 patients). Forty-nine RLNs were excluded because of either loss of signal without preoperative VCP or combined RLN resection. The remaining 728 RLNs were evaluated. The optimal cut-offs of amplitudes or ratios of amplitude decrease on VCP were determined and evaluated. An independent recent cohort (177 RLNs) was analyzed for validation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Quantitative amplitudes of V2 or R2, and V2/V1 or R2/R1 ratio predicted VCP. The V2 of 117–216 μV predicted VCP with high (&gt;80 %) sensitivity and specificity. Interestingly, the AUC of ROC curve of V2 was the highest, and a cut-off 124 μV of V2 most excellently predicted VCP with the highest sensitivity, specificity, and both positive and negative predictive values. In dissociative analyses, a V2 cut-off 124 μV still excellently predicted VCP in all ranges of initial V1 ≥ 100 μV. In a validation cohort, the V2 of 126–205 μV (cut-off 197 μV) predicted VCP with both high (&gt;80 %) sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A quantitative V2 amplitude can predict postoperative VCP among individuals as a simple and a second option, that may be especially useful in some circumstances with unavoidable insufficient initial exposure of vagus nerve.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The advantage of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been widely accepted in thyroid/parathyroid surgery. However, there are discrepancies of amplitudes on recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy and vocal cord paralysis (VCP) because of amplitude variations among individuals. Accordingly, the universal usefulness of quantitative amplitude value per se among patients were assessed.

Study design

IONM using a 4-step method (Vagus nerve (V1)-RLN (R1)-R2-V2) was applied to 777 RLNs (510 patients). Forty-nine RLNs were excluded because of either loss of signal without preoperative VCP or combined RLN resection. The remaining 728 RLNs were evaluated. The optimal cut-offs of amplitudes or ratios of amplitude decrease on VCP were determined and evaluated. An independent recent cohort (177 RLNs) was analyzed for validation.

Results

Quantitative amplitudes of V2 or R2, and V2/V1 or R2/R1 ratio predicted VCP. The V2 of 117–216 μV predicted VCP with high (>80 %) sensitivity and specificity. Interestingly, the AUC of ROC curve of V2 was the highest, and a cut-off 124 μV of V2 most excellently predicted VCP with the highest sensitivity, specificity, and both positive and negative predictive values. In dissociative analyses, a V2 cut-off 124 μV still excellently predicted VCP in all ranges of initial V1 ≥ 100 μV. In a validation cohort, the V2 of 126–205 μV (cut-off 197 μV) predicted VCP with both high (>80 %) sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

A quantitative V2 amplitude can predict postoperative VCP among individuals as a simple and a second option, that may be especially useful in some circumstances with unavoidable insufficient initial exposure of vagus nerve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Use of a microvascular anastomotic coupler device for kidney transplantation in rats Perceptions and attitudes of medical students toward opioid education: A qualitative study Innovative strategies in bile duct repair: Assessing efficacy and safety across varied graft techniques - A systematic review Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients Introduction from the New Editor of Diversity, Justice and Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1