Weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor enhances the genomic prediction accuracy for milk citrate predicted by milk mid-infrared spectra of Holstein cows in early lactation

IF 2.2 JDS communications Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.3168/jdsc.2024-0607
Y. Chen , H. Atashi , C. Grelet , N. Gengler
{"title":"Weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor enhances the genomic prediction accuracy for milk citrate predicted by milk mid-infrared spectra of Holstein cows in early lactation","authors":"Y. Chen ,&nbsp;H. Atashi ,&nbsp;C. Grelet ,&nbsp;N. Gengler","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have shown that milk citrate predicted by milk mid-infrared (MIR) spectra is strongly affected by a few genomic regions. This study aimed to explore the effect of weighted single-step GBLUP on the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) for MIR-predicted milk citrate in early-lactation Holstein cows. A total of 134,517 test-day predicted milk citrate collected within the first 50 DIM on 52,198 Holstein cows from the first 5 parities were used. There were 122,218 animals in the pedigree, of which 4,479 had genotypic data for 566,170 SNPs. Two datasets (partial and whole datasets) were used to verify whether the accuracy of GP is improved using the following different methods. The (genomic) estimated breeding values (EBV or GEBV) in the partial and whole datasets were estimated by pedigree-based BLUP (ABLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP, pedigree-genomic combined using no weight for SNP), and weighted ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP, pedigree-genomic combined using weighted SNP), respectively. The difference between the 2 datasets is that the phenotypic data from 2017 to 2019 in the partial dataset were set as missing values. One hundred eighty-one youngest cows with genomic data were selected as the validation population. A linear regression method was used to compare EBV (GEBV) predicted for partial and whole datasets. The accuracies of GP for ABLUP and ssGBLUP were 0.42 and 0.70, respectively. The accuracies of GP for WssGBLUP in the 5 iterations with different CT (constant) values (determines departure from normality for SNP effects) ranged from 0.70 to 0.86. This study showed that weighted SNP is beneficial in improving prediction accuracy for predicted milk citrate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that milk citrate predicted by milk mid-infrared (MIR) spectra is strongly affected by a few genomic regions. This study aimed to explore the effect of weighted single-step GBLUP on the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) for MIR-predicted milk citrate in early-lactation Holstein cows. A total of 134,517 test-day predicted milk citrate collected within the first 50 DIM on 52,198 Holstein cows from the first 5 parities were used. There were 122,218 animals in the pedigree, of which 4,479 had genotypic data for 566,170 SNPs. Two datasets (partial and whole datasets) were used to verify whether the accuracy of GP is improved using the following different methods. The (genomic) estimated breeding values (EBV or GEBV) in the partial and whole datasets were estimated by pedigree-based BLUP (ABLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP, pedigree-genomic combined using no weight for SNP), and weighted ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP, pedigree-genomic combined using weighted SNP), respectively. The difference between the 2 datasets is that the phenotypic data from 2017 to 2019 in the partial dataset were set as missing values. One hundred eighty-one youngest cows with genomic data were selected as the validation population. A linear regression method was used to compare EBV (GEBV) predicted for partial and whole datasets. The accuracies of GP for ABLUP and ssGBLUP were 0.42 and 0.70, respectively. The accuracies of GP for WssGBLUP in the 5 iterations with different CT (constant) values (determines departure from normality for SNP effects) ranged from 0.70 to 0.86. This study showed that weighted SNP is beneficial in improving prediction accuracy for predicted milk citrate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加权单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测器提高了荷斯坦奶牛泌乳早期乳中红外光谱预测柠檬酸盐的基因组预测精度。
以往的研究表明,牛奶中红外(MIR)光谱预测的牛奶柠檬酸盐受到少数基因组区域的强烈影响。本研究旨在探讨加权单步GBLUP对泌乳早期荷斯坦奶牛基因组预测(GP) mir预测乳柠檬酸盐准确性的影响。使用前5胎52198头荷斯坦奶牛在前50个DIM内收集的134517个试验日预测乳柠檬酸盐。家谱中有122218只动物,其中4479只具有566170个snp的基因型数据。使用两个数据集(部分数据集和整个数据集)验证使用以下不同方法是否提高了GP的准确性。分别采用基于家系的BLUP (ABLUP)、单步GBLUP (ssGBLUP,家系-基因组组合,不使用SNP权重)和加权ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP,家系-基因组组合,使用加权SNP)估算部分和全数据集的育种值(EBV或GEBV)。两个数据集的不同之处在于,部分数据集中2017 - 2019年的表型数据被设置为缺失值。选取具有基因组数据的最年轻奶牛181头作为验证群体。采用线性回归方法对部分数据集和整个数据集预测的EBV (GEBV)进行比较。ABLUP和ssGBLUP的GP精度分别为0.42和0.70。不同CT(常数)值(决定SNP效应偏离正态性)的5次迭代中,WssGBLUP的GP精度在0.70 ~ 0.86之间。本研究表明,加权SNP有利于提高预测牛奶柠檬酸盐的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Predicting productive, health, and reproductive traits in Mexican Holstein cattle using single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes, and runs of homozygosity Reducing water usage to cool cows by applying smart technologies JDS Communications® 2025 Editorial Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1