An examination of the use of standard operating procedures on family-operated farms

IF 2.2 JDS communications Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3168/jdsc.2024-0587
M. Beecher, T. Lawton, C. Hogan
{"title":"An examination of the use of standard operating procedures on family-operated farms","authors":"M. Beecher,&nbsp;T. Lawton,&nbsp;C. Hogan","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Standard operating procedures (SOPs) can improve farm work organization by ensuring processes are standardized among the different people completing the same task. In this study, we examined the use of SOPs on family-operated farms and determined the influence of the number of people working on a farm on SOP use. A survey of 315 Irish dairy farms was completed examining the human resource and workload management practices; this study used a subset of questions from that survey. Of the 315 farms surveyed, the average herd size was 125 cows and there was 1 other person working with the farmer (range 0 to 5 people). Categorizing farms based on the number of people working on farm, 35% of the farms were owner-operators, 37% had 1 other worker, and 28% had 2 or more workers. Overall, 31.3% (n = 98) of all farms surveyed had written SOPs, whereas 68.7% (n = 217) had no written SOPs. Interest in ready-made SOPs among farmers was high (77%). Farms without SOPs found it significantly more difficult to write down work processes and lacked time to create SOPs compared with farms with SOPs. Standard operating procedures most frequently existed for milking (89%), management of fresh cows (35%), and reproduction (29%). Respondents indicated that consistency in work completion was the greatest benefit of having SOPs (39.8%; n = 39), followed by increase in efficiency (17.3%; n = 17) and health and safety (12.2; n = 12). Forty-three percent of farms with more 3 or more people had significantly more written SOPs present compared with 25% of owner-operator farms and 27% farms with 2 people. This research provides a greater understanding of the use of SOPs on family-operated dairy farms, highlighting that the presence of SOPs increases as the number of workers on farm increases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard operating procedures (SOPs) can improve farm work organization by ensuring processes are standardized among the different people completing the same task. In this study, we examined the use of SOPs on family-operated farms and determined the influence of the number of people working on a farm on SOP use. A survey of 315 Irish dairy farms was completed examining the human resource and workload management practices; this study used a subset of questions from that survey. Of the 315 farms surveyed, the average herd size was 125 cows and there was 1 other person working with the farmer (range 0 to 5 people). Categorizing farms based on the number of people working on farm, 35% of the farms were owner-operators, 37% had 1 other worker, and 28% had 2 or more workers. Overall, 31.3% (n = 98) of all farms surveyed had written SOPs, whereas 68.7% (n = 217) had no written SOPs. Interest in ready-made SOPs among farmers was high (77%). Farms without SOPs found it significantly more difficult to write down work processes and lacked time to create SOPs compared with farms with SOPs. Standard operating procedures most frequently existed for milking (89%), management of fresh cows (35%), and reproduction (29%). Respondents indicated that consistency in work completion was the greatest benefit of having SOPs (39.8%; n = 39), followed by increase in efficiency (17.3%; n = 17) and health and safety (12.2; n = 12). Forty-three percent of farms with more 3 or more people had significantly more written SOPs present compared with 25% of owner-operator farms and 27% farms with 2 people. This research provides a greater understanding of the use of SOPs on family-operated dairy farms, highlighting that the presence of SOPs increases as the number of workers on farm increases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对家庭经营农场使用标准操作程序的审查。
标准操作程序(SOPs)可以通过确保完成相同任务的不同人员之间的流程标准化来改善农场工作组织。在本研究中,我们考察了家庭经营农场的SOP使用情况,并确定了农场工作人数对SOP使用的影响。完成了对315个爱尔兰奶牛场的调查,审查了人力资源和工作量管理做法;这项研究使用了该调查中的一部分问题。在接受调查的315个农场中,平均畜群规模为125头牛,另有1人与农场主一起工作(范围为0至5人)。根据在农场工作的人数对农场进行分类,35%的农场是业主经营者,37%有1名其他工人,28%有2名或更多工人。总体而言,31.3% (n = 98)的受访农场编写了sop, 68.7% (n = 217)的受访农场没有编写sop。农民对现成的标准操作程序的兴趣很高(77%)。没有标准操作程序的农场发现,与有标准操作程序的农场相比,编写工作流程要困难得多,而且缺乏时间来创建标准操作程序。标准操作程序最常见的是挤奶(89%)、新鲜奶牛管理(35%)和繁殖(29%)。受访者表示,工作完成的一致性是拥有标准操作程序的最大好处(39.8%;N = 39),其次是效率提高(17.3%;N = 17)和健康与安全(12.2;N = 12)。与25%的业主经营农场和27%的2人农场相比,43%的3人以上农场有更多的书面sop。这项研究为家庭经营的奶牛场使用标准操作程序提供了更好的理解,强调标准操作程序的存在随着农场工人数量的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Insights into cow-level risk factors for highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 clinical disease in lactating Holsteins from a single outbreak in Colorado: An observational study High immune responder cows have lower treatment risk and reduced milk loss during highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 outbreaks Agreement and reliability of dairy cow udder morphometrics between traditional measurements and measurements from a 3-dimensional scanner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1