Modeling Li isotope fractionation during the coal-combustion process and evaluating its capacity as an environmental tracer

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Chemical Geology Pub Date : 2025-03-30 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122631
Jing Chen , Yilin Xiao , Jack Geary Murphy , Dong-Bo Tan , Yang-Yang Wang , Biao Fu , Guijian Liu , Ru-Wei Wang , Xiaoxia Wang , Feng-Tai Tong
{"title":"Modeling Li isotope fractionation during the coal-combustion process and evaluating its capacity as an environmental tracer","authors":"Jing Chen ,&nbsp;Yilin Xiao ,&nbsp;Jack Geary Murphy ,&nbsp;Dong-Bo Tan ,&nbsp;Yang-Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Biao Fu ,&nbsp;Guijian Liu ,&nbsp;Ru-Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Wang ,&nbsp;Feng-Tai Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) utilizing lithium-rich coal are significant sources of anthropogenic Li emissions, highlighting the importance of effective tracing of potentially toxic Li for environmental monitoring and regulation. Lithium isotopes are a promising tracer, yet the dynamics of isotopic behavior during coal combustion are not well understood. This study investigates the elemental and isotopic behavior of Li in feed coals and combustion products from two pulverized coal-fired boilers (PC-H and PC-X) and one circulating fluidized bed boiler (CFB-H). The results showed that Li was primarily captured in fly ash (66.4 % to 84.8 %), with a fraction (1.3 % to 25.2 %) emitted into the atmosphere (stack emission). The isotopic composition of Li in feed coal ranged from −0.6 ‰ to +0.3 ‰, contrasting with δ<sup>7</sup>Li values in bottom ash and fly ash, which range from −2.7 ‰ to +0.1 ‰ and − 1.9 ‰ to +0.5 ‰, respectively. Notably, bottom ash samples consistently exhibit lower δ<sup>7</sup>Li values than their corresponding feed coal, suggesting the volatilization of heavier Li isotopes during combustion. Mass balance calculations reveal that stack emissions are enriched in heavier isotopes, with δ<sup>7</sup>Li values reaching up to +17.8 ‰. A Rayleigh fractionation model, with a fractionation factor of α = 1.0044, indicates that light lithium isotopes preferentially condense onto fly ash, while heavier isotopes are predominantly found in stack emissions. This model provides a quantitative framework for understanding isotopic segregation during cooling, significantly advancing methodologies for tracing and quantifying Li emissions for environmental impact assessments and source attribution of anthropogenic Li from CFPPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"677 ","pages":"Article 122631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925412500021X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) utilizing lithium-rich coal are significant sources of anthropogenic Li emissions, highlighting the importance of effective tracing of potentially toxic Li for environmental monitoring and regulation. Lithium isotopes are a promising tracer, yet the dynamics of isotopic behavior during coal combustion are not well understood. This study investigates the elemental and isotopic behavior of Li in feed coals and combustion products from two pulverized coal-fired boilers (PC-H and PC-X) and one circulating fluidized bed boiler (CFB-H). The results showed that Li was primarily captured in fly ash (66.4 % to 84.8 %), with a fraction (1.3 % to 25.2 %) emitted into the atmosphere (stack emission). The isotopic composition of Li in feed coal ranged from −0.6 ‰ to +0.3 ‰, contrasting with δ7Li values in bottom ash and fly ash, which range from −2.7 ‰ to +0.1 ‰ and − 1.9 ‰ to +0.5 ‰, respectively. Notably, bottom ash samples consistently exhibit lower δ7Li values than their corresponding feed coal, suggesting the volatilization of heavier Li isotopes during combustion. Mass balance calculations reveal that stack emissions are enriched in heavier isotopes, with δ7Li values reaching up to +17.8 ‰. A Rayleigh fractionation model, with a fractionation factor of α = 1.0044, indicates that light lithium isotopes preferentially condense onto fly ash, while heavier isotopes are predominantly found in stack emissions. This model provides a quantitative framework for understanding isotopic segregation during cooling, significantly advancing methodologies for tracing and quantifying Li emissions for environmental impact assessments and source attribution of anthropogenic Li from CFPPs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤燃烧过程中Li同位素分馏模拟及环境示踪能力评价
利用富锂煤的燃煤电厂(CFPPs)是人为锂排放的重要来源,这凸显了有效追踪潜在有毒锂对环境监测和监管的重要性。锂同位素是一种很有前途的示踪剂,但煤燃烧过程中同位素行为的动力学尚不清楚。本研究研究了两台燃煤锅炉(PC-H和PC-X)和一台循环流化床锅炉(CFB-H)的原料煤和燃烧产物中Li的元素和同位素行为。结果表明,Li主要在飞灰中被捕获(66.4% ~ 84.8%),少部分(1.3% ~ 25.2%)排放到大气中(烟囱排放)。煤中Li的同位素组成范围为- 0.6‰~ +0.3‰,而底灰和飞灰的δ7Li值分别为- 2.7‰~ +0.1‰和- 1.9‰~ +0.5‰。值得注意的是,底灰样品的δ7Li值始终低于相应的原料煤,这表明在燃烧过程中挥发了较重的Li同位素。质量平衡计算表明,叠堆辐射富集于重同位素,δ7Li值高达+17.8‰。一个分馏因子为α = 1.0044的瑞利分馏模型表明,轻锂同位素优先凝结在飞灰上,而重锂同位素主要存在于烟囱排放物中。该模型为理解冷却过程中的同位素分离提供了一个定量框架,显著推进了追踪和量化锂排放的方法,用于环境影响评估和cfpp人为锂的来源归属。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Geology
Chemical Geology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry. The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry. Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry. The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.
期刊最新文献
High-pressure experimental constraints of carbonates + pyrite ± water interactions: implications for coupled C-H-O-S cycling in subduction zones Contribution of Fe K-edge XANES spectroscopy to the characterization of Fe distribution in clay minerals. Application during experimental alteration of swelling clay minerals A central position for the South China Block in Rodinia: New evidence from a non-subduction origin of the 827 ± 22 Ma episode mafic–ultramafic rocks Exploring biogeochemical processes through untargeted screening of solvent-extracted molecular signatures HF(aq) thermodynamics in hydrothermal fluids and implications for metal transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1