Early MRI Can Predict the Indication for Surgery in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: Results of the NAPTIME Study.

Andrea S Bauer,Ann E Van Heest,M Claire Manske,Peter Y Shen,Martin J Asis,Jennifer Chang,Sandra Taylor,Michelle A James
{"title":"Early MRI Can Predict the Indication for Surgery in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: Results of the NAPTIME Study.","authors":"Andrea S Bauer,Ann E Van Heest,M Claire Manske,Peter Y Shen,Martin J Asis,Jennifer Chang,Sandra Taylor,Michelle A James","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been routinely used for infants with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI); instead, the decision to operate is based on the trajectory of clinical recovery by 6 months of age. The aim of this study was to develop an MRI protocol that can be performed without sedation or contrast in order to identify infants who would benefit from surgery at an earlier age than the age at which that decision could be made clinically.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis prospective multicenter NAPTIME (Non-Anesthetized Plexus Technique for Infant MRI Evaluation) study included infants aged 28 to 120 days with BPBI from 3 tertiary care centers. Subjects had nonsedated non-contrast rapid volumetric proton density MRI on 3-T scanners. Neuroradiologists at each site calculated the NAPTIME nerve root injury score for subjects at their site. Interrater reliability was performed on a subset of subjects. All of the subjects were evaluated with routine clinical examinations up to 6 months of age, by which time the treating surgeon determined whether to offer nerve surgery. Surgeons were blinded to the MRI results. The ability of the NAPTIME score to discriminate surgeon indication for surgery was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, by estimating the area under the curve (AUC) across the range of NAPTIME scores.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSixty-five infants successfully completed the NAPTIME MRI; 18 (28%) ultimately met the clinical criteria for nerve surgery. The interrater reliability for the NAPTIME score was moderate at 0.703 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.582 to 0.818). The median NAPTIME score for subjects who met the criteria for nerve surgery was 16.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 9.9 to 18.9), while the median score for those who did not was 7.0 (IQR, 5.0 to10.5). The NAPTIME score predicted meeting the criteria for surgery with an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI, 0.688 to 0.936). A score of >13 offered a specificity of 0.94 and a sensitivity of 0.61 for surgical indication.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nNon-contrast MRI without sedation is a useful tool in determining the severity of injury in BPBI. The NAPTIME score might distinguish which infants will meet the criteria for reconstructive nerve surgery earlier than when the decision can be made clinically.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been routinely used for infants with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI); instead, the decision to operate is based on the trajectory of clinical recovery by 6 months of age. The aim of this study was to develop an MRI protocol that can be performed without sedation or contrast in order to identify infants who would benefit from surgery at an earlier age than the age at which that decision could be made clinically. METHODS This prospective multicenter NAPTIME (Non-Anesthetized Plexus Technique for Infant MRI Evaluation) study included infants aged 28 to 120 days with BPBI from 3 tertiary care centers. Subjects had nonsedated non-contrast rapid volumetric proton density MRI on 3-T scanners. Neuroradiologists at each site calculated the NAPTIME nerve root injury score for subjects at their site. Interrater reliability was performed on a subset of subjects. All of the subjects were evaluated with routine clinical examinations up to 6 months of age, by which time the treating surgeon determined whether to offer nerve surgery. Surgeons were blinded to the MRI results. The ability of the NAPTIME score to discriminate surgeon indication for surgery was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, by estimating the area under the curve (AUC) across the range of NAPTIME scores. RESULTS Sixty-five infants successfully completed the NAPTIME MRI; 18 (28%) ultimately met the clinical criteria for nerve surgery. The interrater reliability for the NAPTIME score was moderate at 0.703 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.582 to 0.818). The median NAPTIME score for subjects who met the criteria for nerve surgery was 16.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 9.9 to 18.9), while the median score for those who did not was 7.0 (IQR, 5.0 to10.5). The NAPTIME score predicted meeting the criteria for surgery with an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI, 0.688 to 0.936). A score of >13 offered a specificity of 0.94 and a sensitivity of 0.61 for surgical indication. CONCLUSIONS Non-contrast MRI without sedation is a useful tool in determining the severity of injury in BPBI. The NAPTIME score might distinguish which infants will meet the criteria for reconstructive nerve surgery earlier than when the decision can be made clinically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期MRI可以预测臂丛出生损伤的手术指征:NAPTIME研究的结果。
背景磁共振成像(MRI)尚未常规用于臂丛出生损伤(BPBI)的婴儿;相反,手术的决定是基于6个月大时临床恢复的轨迹。本研究的目的是开发一种无需镇静或造影剂即可进行的MRI方案,以确定哪些婴儿将从手术中受益,而不是在临床可以做出决定的年龄。方法本前瞻性多中心NAPTIME(非麻醉神经丛技术用于婴儿MRI评估)研究纳入了来自3个三级保健中心的28至120天BPBI婴儿。受试者在3-T扫描仪上进行非镇静非造影剂快速体积质子密度MRI。每个地点的神经放射科医生为他们的地点的受试者计算NAPTIME神经根损伤评分。对一部分受试者进行了互估者信度测试。所有受试者在6个月大之前进行常规临床检查,此时主治医生决定是否进行神经手术。外科医生对核磁共振结果不知情。通过估算NAPTIME评分范围内的曲线下面积(AUC),利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估NAPTIME评分区分外科医生手术指征的能力。结果65例婴幼儿成功完成NAPTIME MRI检查;18例(28%)最终符合神经外科的临床标准。NAPTIME评分的判读信度中等,为0.703(95%可信区间[CI], 0.582至0.818)。符合神经手术标准的受试者的中位数NAPTIME评分为16.2(四分位数范围[IQR], 9.9至18.9),而不符合标准的受试者的中位数评分为7.0 (IQR, 5.0至10.5)。NAPTIME评分预测符合手术标准,AUC为0.812 (95% CI, 0.688 ~ 0.936)。bbbb13分对手术指征的特异性为0.94,敏感性为0.61。结论不加镇静的非对比MRI是判断脑卒中损伤严重程度的有效工具。NAPTIME评分可能会比临床做出决定更早地区分哪些婴儿将符合神经重建手术的标准。证据水平:预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orthopaedic Research in Singapore: The Past, Present, and Future. Evaluating the Wear of a Viscoelastic Spinal Disc in the Context of Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Commentary on an article by Kingsley R. Chin, MD, et al.: "Comparative in Vitro Analysis of Wear Particles Generated by a Viscoelastic Disc Versus 2 Articulating Total Disc Replacements". Better Balance for Patients with Lumbar AIS: Commentary on an article by Mun Keong Kwan, MBBS, MSOrth, et al.: "Prevention of Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with a Major Lumbar Curve. The Intraoperative Crossbar Coronal-Balancing Technique". Recurrently Back to the Drawing Board on Thromboprophylaxis After Spine Surgery: Commentary on an article by Ahmad Essa, MD, MPH, et al.: "Trends and Impact of Pharmacological VTE Prophylaxis Timing for Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Across North American Trauma Centers". The Application of Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1